Political sympathy and antipathy, which reaches the frontier of fanaticism, always and everywhere radically limit the field of knowledge, which in turn translates into even greater Limiting perception. This phenomenon is timeless and international, as we have seen in the last 24 hours. erstwhile Donald Trump stated: “Today, all civilization will perish and will never return. I do not want this to happen, but it is likely to happen," journalists, experts and politicians around the planet have lost their minds and their simple ability to measure reality.
Indeed, the words of the president of the United States were very strong and publicistic in the word "nuclear option", although it was brushed out, it inactive defended itself, but only in the public sphere. Meanwhile, a full group of analysts began to alarm that Donald Trump was crazy and wanted to bring about atomic destruction. From many serious lips and keyboards came specified warnings, though with a small common sense and cognition of things, it was easy to read Donald Trump's threats as classical force attached to the ultimatum. It was all the more simple to read that the president of the United States clearly defined what would happen if Iran did not meet the terms of the ceasefire. Above all, the “end of civilization” afraid only Iran, and the planned military actions were to destruct energy and communication infrastructure.
Bridges, power stations, tracks, airports, in words, everything associated with civilization, intended to attack American and Israeli troops on an unprecedented scale. Otherwise, it was impossible to realize Donald Trump's words, which he immediately interpreted and added that he did not want to escalate the conflict. From a political and negotiated point of view, experts should address the US president for deficiency of consistency and blurring the harsh message. If Donald Trump's threats were to impress Iran, it would should be "the end of civilization" alternatively than the retail explanation that it was truly about blowing up bridges and power plants. Either way, only “experts” and Political fanatics They could see the explosions of atomic fungi from Tehran to Białystok, due to the fact that that's how they picked up Donald Trump's readable negotiating rhetoric.
It has been known for a long time that Donald Trump says things and has his circumstantial kind of being, specified a typically American, where the sense of greatness intertwins with a Hollywood superhero. All you had to do was put on this 1 filter so as not to embarrass yourself with atomic visions of destruction. The more ambitious should know that if any U.S. president truly went mad and wanted to start a atomic war, then there is simply a full strategy of safety from political, to technical, that prevents it. And that's not over, due to the fact that it's hard to imagine that the arabian allies of the United States would let a atomic attack at their borders, and they would stay absolutely calm, unlike hysterical geopolitical analysts.
An expert analysis is simply a small better for Donald Trump's political gains and losses. It is fair to agree that at best the balance sheet turned out to be zero, but this is an highly optimistic version. You can see to the bare eye that the full operation did not go as planned, and even worse it got out of control. The political nonsubjective was to overthrow the Ayatollah regime, which the Iranians themselves were to help, but the social sentiments in Iran went precisely the other way. In the United States, Donald Trump besides did not improve his quotations and collected quite a few criticism besides from the MEGA movement, which mostly decided to return him to the White House. However, there is simply a immense difference between the rational criticism of Donald Trump and the compromising atomic hysteria that we had the dubious pleasance of watching over the last 24 hours.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
