Sex work? Let's decision on – drink bag and take bag!

Some time ago, I came across sympathetic interviews with “curtiseans” who spoke about details of their work, about earnings, lifestyles and plans. besides that they do this work by choice. I quote: "Work like any other. I would very much like to show this sex work in Poland”.

New definition of the oldest profession

Of course, interviews with commentary appeared on the pages of newspaper.pl, which we all know (together, loud!) is not the ‘Electoral Gazette’Oh, my God! The conversation was conducted by ed. Łukasz Munikowski. I add this out of a sense of press duty, but I do not encourage you to read the full thing.

Not even due to the fact that it's especially offensive, scandalous or corrosive. It's just nothing revealing. due to the fact that pity – adult peasants in the 21st century discovered that there are women who voluntarily give themselves up for money? Weak, isn't it? Yeah, but not really, due to the fact that there's no dog buried here. It is about semantics and tamement of the public with the fact that certain things, so far rightly treated as "margins", are becoming average today. Since the dawn of time, women performing the “oldest profession of the world” have been called courtesans, whores, prostitutes, women of light morals, or—for the apology of Editorials and Readers (I must usage this word) vulgarly—fuck.

While these are all terms that bear alternatively negative, stigmatizing emotional charges, always, everyone knew, knows and will know that specified women are just doing their job. What's the point of considering this?

That's the full philosopher... Until recently!

Sexworkers

Today it is sexworkers And they're doing interviews without being embarrassed about their work. Of course, it is only a part of a complex process of rotting West, but not now.

In the article there is even a definition that truly amused me and inspired me at the same time. Attention, I quote: "Sex work is simply a very broad concept, covering both working straight with the client and showing up on camera or sending underwear. This work is done by real people, feeling emotions and having their needs – just like their customers. However, an crucial step towards standardisation – understood here as gaining fundamental rights by its performers – seems to show how complex it is and how different sex workers approach it.".

The State doesn't bargain from them.

The real cymes of this article is the message of 1 of the ladies who is glad to get money (not small) in hand and not pay the taxation on them. Again, quote: “I truly feel sorry for those mediocre entrepreneurs who give half their earnings to the thieving state”.

So what's it like, dear paper editor.pl? Work like any other? Would they want access to basic rights, like average workers or entrepreneurs? Something's going on.

Or possibly it's inactive just like it always was? So you're just prostitutes with access to all the benefits of modern times like the net and smartphones? They can just be courtesans in more ways now and benefit from it due to the fact that they're turned around, and you're in the forpost of stupidity mopping up ideology!

Professor Adam Wielomski On his social media, he wrote: “For millennia, prostitutes walked the world. In the 21st century, innocent sex workers denied it. Progress’.

Drunk, too.

That inspired me too! In all this progress, I see deception, exclusion and specified discrimination. Let me explain...

What about drunks? Why are we discriminating them? Are we socially stigmatized as alcoholics? This may be a useful activity, or although it gives widespread enjoyment, which is surviving evidence of many artists. If you show a small innovation, it can besides be socially useful – for example, make specified a profession – a tester of alcomats. A small imagination, and it's just a drunk. drink workerOh, my God!

This is, of course, pure malice and ridicule on my part, but there is besides specified a "social group", as old as courtesan, besides considered a margin to date. Ba – everyone knows that specified people were, are, and will be, making money from it, so why discuss it? Again.

Thief – take worker

What about thieves? They may feel excluded in all of this. Let us call it the service and trade manufacture (the key is the order).
I give the definition: "Take work is simply a very broad concept, covering both stationary work with goods and making fake transactions on the net or stealing data virtualally, through software and server hacks. This work is done by real people, feeling emotions and having their needs – just like their customers. However, an crucial step towards standardisation – understood here as gaining fundamental rights by its performers – seems to be to show how complex it is, risky (injuries endanger prison) and how different takers approach it".

It will go on – let them registry their activities, issue invoices, etc.

No, wait... I think they truly feel sorry for mediocre entrepreneurs too, who gotta pay half their wages to the oppressive state...

That's it!

Well, I like this modern approach, which is why I'm going to not exclude and brand people who work hard. I propose the same to you. So, dear Readers, before next time you usage hatred speech and justice individual as Fuck, drunk or thief Then think about it! Take it forward and inclusively: this is sexworker, drinkworker and takeworker – work like any other. (I know that the sex is 176, but I don't know the endings, so go ahead and Google...).

Elwood
(Nameless War)