Berlin is increasingly referring to the practice of totalitarian states, as evidenced by process American author CJ Hopkins, who criticized lockdown and another activities during the alleged Covid-19 pandemic.
Sentence for criticism of lockdown. The investigation against the author began in 2022 after he published on the X portal the cover of his latest work – a collection of essays entitled “The emergence of the fresh average Reich: Consent mill Essays, Vol. III (2020-2021)”. The author subjected the highly harsh criticism and lockdown introduced during the pseudo-pandemic coronavirus, calling it totalitarian, highly harmful to the people of Europe.
Perhaps the scandal would not have erupted if a white swastika had not been placed on the cover of the book against the background of a white protective mask as a proposition that the German authorities' actions were akin to those of the 3rd Reich decision-makers. For the justice system, the cover has become an excuse to launch criminal proceedings against the playwright, accusing him of “a speech of hatred” and “proposing a totalitarian regime”. It's nothing that he just criticized totalitarian methods.
As the Hopkins trial, “fascists” and “nasists” has shown, only people and environments related to conservatives and nationalists are allowed to be called in Germany, while in the case of utilizing specified words in relation to, for example, the actions of left-wing authorities, law enforcement authorities immediately initiate an investigation and accuse individuals of crimes of an extremist nature. This happened with the writer, due to the fact that he dared to undermine the authoritative strategy of combating COVID-19, comparing it with the methods utilized by the totalitarian state apparatus.
On 30 September this year, the Berlin Court of Appeal granted appeal to the prosecutor's appeal and dismissed the acquittal of the territory Court. The case went back to a lower instance, and most likely this time a conviction is to be expected. The trial and allegations made to the author of essays surprise all the more due to the fact that he himself identifies as a social Democrat, and married to a female with judaic roots.
Based on Hopkins' experience, it can be concluded that the left has decided to usage the argumentum ad Hitlerum and extra-literary individual arguments to combat political opponents, avoid polemics, and close their mouths to people who ask uncomfortable questions and let themselves to express their opinions about power.
The author thinksThat the full process from beginning to end is based on fabricated allegations and is 1 large farce, and it follows only that his book on pandemic contains references to the 3rd Reich, and the appearance of the cover refers to a publication by William L. Shirera. “The emergence and Fall of the 3rd Reich: A past of Nazi Germany”.
Hopkins pointed out that if you support everything that the government does and says, then you are not facing charges of hatred speech and promoting Nazism. In support of his thesis, he utilized the example of an alternate to Germany, constantly being accused in a akin way in mainstream media. He stated that seemingly systemic political correctness divided people into equal and equal, depending on their views, due to the fact that mainstream newspapers besides utilized Nazi symbolism without any consequences.
In addition, he made public a passage of the grounds for the Court of Appeal’s ruling to its disadvantage by adding that it was written on a political order. The justice stated that the usage of swastika in the context of presenting his position on the fight against the pandemic is unacceptable and crosses the limits of freedom of expression. In another words, the court has made it clear that expressing an opinion in this way constitutes a violation of the law, due to the fact that it diminishes Nazi panic and the Holocaust.
During his sanitary restrictions, the playwright repeatedly pointed out his opposition to the restrictions, for example by placing the words Befehl ist Befehl in German on the protective mask, meaning “Order is an order!”, frequently at hazard to the public. This is how the Nazis justified themselves at the Nuremberg trial.
In the defence of Hopkins, the writer Berliner Zeitung, Clivia von Dewitz, stood up to prove that, by gagging their mouths, the courts deny liberal discourse in public space, any treating better and allowing more, and others punishing and excluding from discussion. Von Dewitz besides noted that anti-terrorist government was applied in the writer's case, ignoring entirely the rule of proportionality, ordering the essential measures to be taken to meet the situation, at the lowest possible cost for the individual and society.
The situation was artificially exaggerated, creating a sense of danger, while trying to intimidate people with utmost differences from left-wing beliefs.
An American with German citizenship has announced that he intends to appeal to the ultimate Court, as not only he will not let himself to be humiliated and convicted in a show trial, but besides opposes attempts to establish a jurisprudence line that would give the justice strategy green light to the systemic silence of uncomfortable people.
We besides recommend: Netflix cheated on taxes. Office searches
