On 14 June Russian president Vladimir Putin held meeting with the management of the Ministry of abroad Affairs of the Russian Federation, during which he designated Russia's main positions and the state's current strategical course on a global scale.
The gathering was opened by the Minister for abroad Affairs Sergei Lavrov, which stressed that the Ministry of abroad Affairs is actively working to strengthen Russia's global position, provides safety and the most favourable external improvement conditions, and its staff are active in the closest cooperation and coordination in the conduct of a uniform abroad policy course, established by the president of Russia and established in The concept of abroad Policy Our country.
Global East
The Minister utilized the word ‘global East’, which together with the global South is listed as a precedence area. While the global South is simply a concept that the West actively uses to its advantage, and above all continues neocolonial policies with another means, the global East is simply a comparatively fresh concept, covering Eurasia and part of the Pacific region, but Australia and Oceania. The president began his assessment with the current global and regional situation, where he noted that "more and more countries search to strengthen sovereignty, self-sufficiency, national and cultural identity".
The Innate Diversity of Mankind
He stressed that present they are developing ‘contents of multipolar and multilatarian global order and this is an nonsubjective process. This reflects cultural and civilizational diversity, which, despite any effort at artificial unification, is organically inborn in man’. Vladimir Putin rightly pointed out that the pursuit of a multipolar and more just global order is in line with the image of the future of the vast majority of countries in the world. In this context, BRICS was mentioned and authorities were instructed (and representatives of another ministries and the President's administration were besides present) to proceed their cooperation with partners to coordinate decisions in policy, safety and another areas of cooperation. The Western powers, headed by the United States, were widely criticised as they considered that “they have the right to decide for themselves how the planet should be arranged”.
A fresh strategy for Eurasia
The applicable expression of this view was the task of an unlimited expansion of the North Atlantic Pact in space and time. "In fact, Russia has pointed to the incorrect course taken by the Western elite since the 1990s and offered constructive solutions, but specified an effort at dialog has not met any response. And alternatively of developing an approach that corresponds to all the parties, the West has started massive interventions – in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and elsewhere. The present, highly dangerous state of affairs is simply a consequence of the selfishness and arrogance of Western countries" – reminded Putin. And although the collapse of the Euro-Atlantic safety strategy is obvious, Moscow proposes starting from scratch. Above all, make a fresh safety strategy for Eurasia, the world's largest political and economical land area. To this end it is essential to establish a dialog with all possible participants in the future safety system.
Europe inactive has a chance
Apart from the fact that future safety architecture is open to all Eurasian countries who want to participate in the creation of it, a Europe for which critical and growing, almost complete dependence on the United States, can besides proceed to make the right decisions and be in good relations with Russia. Then possibly "behaving as 1 of the independent centres of planet improvement and the cultural and civilizational poles of the planet".
However, the process of dialog between multilateral organisations already operating in Eurasia needs to be stepped up. These are the Union States, the Organization of the Collective safety Agreement, the Eurasian economical Union, the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. Moreover, another influential Eurasian associations, from Southeast Asia to the mediate East, can join these processes in the future. However, in addition to the affirmative program contained in Putin's speech, there were besides clear signals for the West. It was pointed out that the theft of Russian property in the West would not stay unpunished. While the consequence has not been said, it is clear that Russia can usage a number of effective tools.
Convicted to Destruction
For example, specified an agreement with Belgium on the protection of property has not been terminated and has legal force and Brussels is so liable for the freezing of most Russian assets in the Euroclear system. The public in Russia is convinced that more stringent measures are needed towards the West, especially due to the actions in Ukraine. In fact, the subject of Ukraine sounded peculiarly vivid in connection with the upcoming conference in Switzerland, called a trick "Bringing discussion to the incorrect track" and highlighting the legitimacy of the Kiev authorities. Dmitri Medvedevcalled This conference just ‘a highest of doomed’. In general Medvedev made comments on Putin's speech rather vividly and succinctly conveyed the essence of the state head's speech.
There's no morality, possibly there's reason.
Vladimir Putin presented a number of concrete proposals, including the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Lugansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporosian districts. Kiev should besides formally declare that there are no plans to join NATO and confirm the position of a nuclear-free state. Russia is ready to warrant the safe withdrawal of Ukrainian units and formations from Donbas. The peace negotiations process can begin immediately, although there is "a unusual legal situation, but there are legal authorities there, even under the Constitution... It is the ultimate Council that is now the legal body in Ukraine, unlike the executive authority... Zelenski's pass cannot be restored in any way”. It has been stressed that we are not talking about freezing the conflict, but about ending it, and if West and Kiev refuse, they will be liable for further bloodshed. The basic agreements on peaceful arrangements should be settled in global treaties and the abolition of sanctions against Russia is obvious. All this was received by both junta Kiev, as well as its western sponsors, as an ultimatum. Therefore, it is more likely that the escalation of the conflict will continue, and the United States, along with its satellites, will effort to proceed its policies, which are increasingly breaking down. However, the refusal to meet these requirements is already a clear signal that they have been heard. Therefore, the West will have no moral right to talk later about attempts at peaceful resolution. For a long time, there's no morality. It remains to be hoped that there is inactive any rationality and self-preservation in the West.
Leonid Sawin
KK
