I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. text. Since the presidential candidates are making moves and looking for ideas, I can't aid but tangle them.
Antiscript needs a 500+ equivalent. Game changer, which would become the main subject of the election debate, forcing PiS politicians first to desperate defence (it is impossible! Inflation will increase from this! The agencies will lower our ratings! Second Greece and Venezuela! cows will halt calfing!), and then yet to humiliating surrender (“we besides are in favour and promise not to lick”).
The apparent thought seems to me, as usual, Mitbestimmung. You'd gotta call it something good in Polish, but I don't know how to make up fancy slogans.
It's just about empowering employees of large companies. Increase the powers of the Staff Councils, the statutory introduction of their representatives to the Supervisory Boards – as it has been for 70 years in Germany.
The PiS has a ambiguity towards the Germans. It scares them, but at the same time it loves the argument "as it is in Germany".
In the presidential campaign, they promised us that we would make money just like in Germany. Only that the PiS treats it as a rule of the cult of cargo – the deficiency of basic reflection, why Germans gain more from Poles.
The argument that was valid 30 years ago – that their companies are richer and more efficient, so ‘they can pay more’ is out of date. The Volkswagen mill or Amazon magazine in Poland works as efficiently as their German stories.
W Germany pays more not due to the fact that they can only due to the fact that they MUST. all korpoludek in Poland knows that even if his employer got a billion dollars from a goldfish, he would see a fig with poppy. All shareholders (as a dividend) and board (as bonuses) will collect everything. Workers' earnings will stay unchanged.
W Germany would not. There, representatives of employees on the Supervisory Board would be able to force a different division of this billion – 1 in which something will even catch on to the locker room.
For years, productivity in Poland has grown much faster than wages. And that will not change until we introduce specified mechanisms in Poland.
Kaczyński won't do it. He was 5 years old, and he didn't even signal that intention.
The ‘institution’ is not the PiS style. Even supporters of this organization admit that she does not want to grant fresh rights to any group,
On the contrary, it is in favour of receiving them (teachers, journalists, lawyers, doctors, etc.). but the PiS supporter likes it, and the opponent doesn't.
The platform is besides mentally incapable to do so. She has besides much to do with Corvinobalcer circles.
The Hołównia and Trzaskowski, however, have free hands, at least theoretically. So I hereby propose this as my program proposal for their moves.
That is the most of course my dream of introducing this in Poland by the government of Prime Minister Zandberg. But I'll be glad if anyone does.
Paraphrasing Churchill, if Satan had reported an worker empowerment program, I would have put any warm words about hell in the next blognot. I'd even praise the Law and Justice for that.
A pandemic is simply a good time to change your head about the economy. The first 30 years of capitalism in Poland were part of 500 years of tradition of the farm and state economy.
We had “successful people” who “created jobs”. There was no “we”, there was “me” (the superb president who is liable for the success of the company, and so deserves the prize) and “you” (the feudal household whose company is “giving” the job).
The pandemic forced many companies to think in the category "we". However, it turned out that the company as a community was not liable for the successes of the erstwhile years.
It is hard to feel a community erstwhile the president earns 1 and a half million a year, and employees respective twelve times little (this is how it looks in Agora). And they inactive hear from the CEO that everything needs to be saved.
The current state of law makes no sense. Many laws require the representation of employees who, for example, agree to collective dismissal conditions, the selection of PPKs, the rules of operation of the social fund or (as recently) the consent to a 80% simplification in earnings.
Logically, that's what their democratically elected representatives should do. But almost all bill has these powers of the trade union committee.
Conclusion – shout with 9 colleagues and establish a relationship. On behalf of thousands of people, you will co-determine millions of funds. Yes, Polish law is so stupid.
The large union office will most likely effort to veto the changes, due to the fact that in the short word it weakens their position. Personally as a local Frank Sobotka, however, I would be happy to get free of this "power" (serially: hell me?) for the actual empowerment of the crew.
Cleaning up this mess is not a substance of left or right, but of reason and dignity. But speaking of that, I would remind you that this is how the CDU happened to the SPD from the left mania and provided itself with political hegemony in the West Germany.
Who needs social democracy erstwhile the most prized working class owes to chades? Social Democrats hatred him, so Adenauer made them redundant (for 70 years of the existence of Germany, CDU rules by 52).
This proposal cannot be refuted by the conventional argument "we cannot afford it, we must first build capitalism and then think about socialism." The Germans introduced this in 1951, erstwhile the country was in ruins (and that is why they introduced it to motivate the workers to set up their "their" establishments).
The past of the welfare and social marketplace economy is my thing. I don't know a single example in which it was built on specified a rule that individual said, "OK, we can afford it now, let's introduce it."
Whether in Japan, or in Sweden, or in Britain, or yet in Germany, it always looked like this: “the country is in ruins, we request to introduce social, due to the fact that people live in poverty.”
We're not in ruins. But most of us live and work in the S.A. Farm.
