Before the election Łobowatelska Lobietathat it will not rise the retirement age. This promise is likely to be kept in the same way as the others, or not at all. However, the coalition parties PO and PSL inactive remember all 8 years ago they blew them off the saddle, so they approach the subject with any shyness, as can be said, quoting 1 of the first commercials on Polish tv 30 years ago. However, at all minute they dared more and more.
Recently, the ministrica of funds and regional policy Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz splashed on Onet's programme in the morning about the request for changes, of course causing unfavorable comments. You could say it's an isolated case, and you're not even from the department of work or the PO. Meanwhile, regular media contributions of this kind are utilized to support the subject and probe opinions. erstwhile the reactions are sharp and definitely negative, the subject is put aside for a while to return to it in any time.
The second, little risky way for the government to tame society with unwanted projects is to put in the media opinions of alleged experts, supposedly independent. An expert talks and sends a message to the people, and the government can stand aside and pretend to be Greek. 1 way or another, we are constantly attacked by the media about the request to rise the retirement age. They tell us that less and less people are working, and that the number of pensioners is growing, so a decreasing group of workers will not gain old people's pensions.
Somewhere the message of neoliberal economists, which was repeatedly repeated during subsequent pension reforms, disappeared. Apparently, we paid contributions to rise capital for our pensions, which means that no 1 has to work for our pensions anymore. We're the ones who work for them alone, and as much as anyone who works for them will have. The accumulated capital translates into manufacturing forces, automated production, etc., so the contributions of the next generations should not affect the pensions of current pensioners. That was the justification for the reforms.
Meanwhile, it turns out that in this way capital works exclusively for corporations and globalist billionaires, and for pensioners no longer. So the fresh strategy is the old pyramid. In fact, the full wise neoliberal improvement of the strategy was intended to service only 1 purpose, namely to reduce the rate of replacement, which is, in human terms, to reduce pensions in relation to wages. And to find reasons for continuing to reduce pensions permanently. The economical or demographic situation always provides an alibi for the simplification of pensions, but someway the same wise arguments have never utilized to reduce the earnings of presidents and directors of banks and corporations, or EU politicians, or corporate and oligarch income.
There are now reported to be so many shortages of workers that it is essential to extend work placement before retirement. As an alternative, we are sometimes presented with increased immigration, as young people coming from distant countries would be working for our already busy pensions. It turns out, however, that this solution does not work anywhere. Visitors are neither qualified nor willing to work. Those who stay with us mostly live at our expense, others go to countries with a higher social background. The emergence of a large percent of people not related to local culture raises more problems than solves them.
It can be said that, on the general background of immigration, Ukrainian visitors are unique in a affirmative sense due to the fact that they are Europeans. Most of them are qualified and willing to work and akin to our cultural and civilizational experiences, thanks to which they work well in the labour marketplace and in society. Unfortunately, it spoils the superb ideas of our governments, specified as Minister Kosiniak-Kamish wanting to send refugees into the hands of the dictator to make them cannon meat.
How much worse it can be, shows the example of the second half of 1990, erstwhile Poland accepted thousands of fighters with families from Chechnya to spite Russia. It was hard to require that women who were allowed to leave their home only the company of a man in their household function in Polish society and do any work. But men were very eager to work and rapidly began to offer services in line with their qualifications. For respective years the shootings and bombings became the everyday life of major cities in Poland. The only advantage was the ease of influencing a debtor or an unfair counterparty, due to the fact that Chechen fighters offered promotional rates and advanced efficiency. Now they have most likely already passed on to well-earned pensions, and we have in Warsaw Rondo Generalissimos Jochar Dudaj, of course to spite Russia.
In consequence to the protests of those who fear immigrants from muslim countries, the left and neoliberal sages reiterate that we should realize and respect their diversity, beliefs and culture. Meanwhile, these visitors to the countries of Europe do not want to respect our values, they respect European culture, democracy, women's rights, etc. as the inventions of Satan to be fought with and destroyed in the name of God. They do not want assimilation in their host countries, whom they truly hatred and despise, as do the countries of those inhabitants. For example, it is worth following the latest news from the UK, but not necessarily from the major releases of authoritative media.
I propose to the infidels a closer look at Sweden, which from 1 of the safest countries in Europe has turned into the most dangerous, and bloody gang wars are already normal. I do not give links to media information, due to the fact that there are besides many of them, and it is easy to find them by entering 2 words into the search engine: Sweden and crime. The side effect of this situation is justified by the fight against crime by limiting civilian rights in the applause of citizens themselves, for example by introducing the following "security zones". https://events.interia.pl/report-media-foreign/news-le-monde-first-special-zone-in-Sweden-to-reaction-on-p,nId,7598509
Freedom of movement between Scandinavian countries is besides restricted by crime.
It is suspected that in subsequent countries, it may be possible that this condition is being introduced specifically to justify the application of measures to the rights and freedoms of citizens. We'll check you out first for no reason in a peculiar zone, but in a small while, it's everywhere and anytime. It's not like that. That's what you wanted, Grzegorz Dyndala..
On the portal: https://www.eupedia.com/europe/crime_maps_of_europe.shtml you can see how Europe's crime maps look. For example, here are the frequency maps below rape and theft. The yearly number of crimes of a given kind per 100 000 inhabitants is presented during the indicated period. I propose you enter the designated portal and check the frequency maps of another types of crime. delight note that These data are respective years late, and problems are increasing very quickly, so in fact it is much worse.
Do we inactive want to receive immigrants from all over the world?
Does anyone else think that immigration can solve the problem of deficiency of workers, especially those qualified?
Thus, there is reportedly no alternate to raising the retirement age. That's how our employers, economists, experts convince us. We gotta work longer, due to the fact that now there is no 1 to work for us, even though we have retired for decades.
At the same time, the thought of shortening the week of work is completely opposed, as if there were besides many workers.
These are the excellent ideas of the government, as reported by www.infor.pl:
Soon, the government will decide which of the 2 options will appear in the revised Labour Code: 35-hour work week or four-day work week. The first solution means to stay at work from Monday to Friday, but shortened from 8 to 7 hours a day.
The second is simply a real revolution to measurement the introduction of half a century ago all free Saturdays. It means that all weekend will start by Thursday late afternoon. The deal is that the organization of working time will most likely be that any will have 3 days off Friday-Sunday and others Saturday-Monday.
This is all due to the fact that more people are behind the 4 - day work week than short - word jobs.
Two options are discussed at the same time:
There's 1 thing for sure. Regardless of what solutions will yet go on the way of government and will shortly become a law common in Poland, the Labour Code awaits a real revolution concerning working time. It will consequence in shortening the working time, although it is not yet known how.
Is it possible to work 4 days and 35-day holiday? I guess that's out of the question, due to the fact that in practice, it would mean a two-month vacation for everyone employed. 35 days per working week is almost 9 weeks, or 2 months.Already more likely to be associated with the option twice 35: 35-hour working week and 35-day vacation year.
Of course, we should not look for logic in simultaneous changes to the labour code and the pension system, especially in the relation between these actions. On the 1 hand, extending the retirement age, on the another hand shortening the working week. Let's effort to make a rough estimate. The simplification in working time clearly means a simplification in the number of days worked per year. A 35-hour work week is introduced. At the same time, solutions are introduced giving 35 days of leave for all employees regardless of their work experience. According to the online entrepreneur's guide in 2024 will be 251 working days, i.e. 2008 hours. After the changes, it would only be 1757 hours, a drop of 12.5%. In addition, there are changes in vacations that will take respective twelve hours or more. This will effectively reduce the working time of all workers by more than a period a year.
At the same time, 2 draft amendments are to be implemented.
The first is simply a task to rise the retirement age due to the alleged deficiency of employees.
The second task is to importantly reduce working time, from 40 to 35 hours a week and extend leave to 35 days for all those working.
What's the point?
It is said that the shortening of the working week is to take place without lowering wages and that there are no complaints from employers about this. It's very strange. I remember that erstwhile the feast of the 3 Kings was restored 14 years ago, and so it was about 1 extra day off, employers' organizations were very intensely protesting, showing the tremendous amount of harm that this would bring to their businesses and the full economy. How is it essential to shorten working time by complaining about shortages of workers and the request to extend the work of old people?
If we compare the number of working hours, it turns out that working in the current strategy for 40 years, the current pensioners worked nearly 47 years respectively according to the strategy to enter into force. This besides applies to those who have not yet retired, but are close. They all earned their pensions a long time ago, and now they find out there's no 1 to work on them, so they gotta proceed at the station due to the fact that the planet will collapse. In the meantime, the government is giving extra time off to those who are far from retirement.
Raising retirement age has its large disadvantages. First, employers are very reluctant to take people over 50 into work, but they are eager to get free of them. There are those who systematically review staff to get free of employees in time before they scope their pre-retirement age, providing them with employment protection until retirement. Old people are fired under different circumstances. I hear they're worse workers. As usual, experts find a mass of justifications for specified actions.
Never head the arguments, these are facts, for old people uncovering or keeping a occupation is simply a problem. In any professions too, it is problematic to be able to work in the profession. On the 1 hand, are ideas of taking distant amateur driving licenses from older people due to the fact that they are expected to pose a danger on the roads, on the another hand, a professional driver is expected to work until the age of seventy? How long does a crane operator gotta work, a man working at heights, a construction worker, an ambulance driver, a garbage man, a fireman, a cleaner, a surgeon? How many years do they gotta retire? president of Business Centre Club Marek Goliszewski did not work physically, but did not live to 70. You'll say he was sick, right, but most people in his 60s are sick. Someone's gonna say they can reclassify erstwhile they're old. Programmers or hostesses? Preferably CEOs.
On the another hand, the immense confusion in the economy that will consequence from shortening the working week is hard to imagine. There are only a number of different types of specialists and qualified workers. In order not to halt the economy, there should be more after the changes in the labour code, but from where? Think of teachers, doctors, drivers. Who will teach? How's the line going to extend to doctors? Will trains ride and hospitals only treat the designated days of the week?
People who no longer have wellness and strength are told to work longer while offering additional vacations including full professional productivity. Of course, no 1 wonders about the sense of specified actions. We're gonna do the right thing, make sense or make no sense, whether you want it or not. It is interesting that the Łobywatelska Kolalicja, especially the Full They didn't have it. even in electoral promises and I don't think anyone in Poland expects this from them.
This is simply a completely external thought of EU bureaucrats and globalist ideologists that we have not chosen, but who regulation us through the corrupt machinery of the institutions of the European Union. Our business and our welfare are meaningless to them. If individual is in doubt, should he think of the sanctions active in the failure to implement the EU Directive on the amendment of the Labour Code? Are they threatening Poland with multimillion-dollar penalties for daring to defend its own interests? However, it may be essential to refrain from implementing this directive until the mess in the another countries becomes apparent, but it is hard to number on this in the case of a coalition for the pain of central planners from the European Union.
Such actions destruct the social tissue and the national economy, and this is not an accident. This is due to the fact that this is the right nonsubjective of these actions, and the power that we have supposedly chosen humbly fulfills the wishes and objectives of the external powers. And contrary to president Kaczyński's opinion, it is not Germany or Russia. It is simply a large global capital and globalist organizations specified as WEF (World economical Forum). possibly for a reason, the ideologist WEF Yuval Noah Harari called pensioners useless bread eaters with whom humanity must do something. Unfortunately, the current Prime Minister is simply a pupil of the School of Young Leaders of the WEF, so it is hard to anticipate from him actions in accordance with the interests of Polish citizens. In this case, I invitation you to read the following text.
I inactive thought it would make sense to request a referendum to decide whether we like to keep or even lower the current retirement age and keep the current labour code or rise the age and longer holidays. However, I realized that most audiences do not look more than a week ahead and cannot foretell the distant effects of today's decisions. They act like a grasshopper, not an ant from the fable of de la Fontaine, so they will happily choose a longer vacation without reasoning of themselves in 20-30 years.
Just perceive to how complain about low pensions actors and entertainers who have made good money their full life, but contributions paid the lowest of possible or none. any have put something aside, others have not, but they complain almost all of them, empathizing with the amount of the witnessing. Smart people, but they didn't. Causal-effectual relationships are hermetic teachings not available to average mortals. Therefore, the strategy of compulsory pension contributions makes sense, despite its vulnerability to the fantaber of politicians.
The reduced number of working hours regardless of plans and declarations will consequence in reduced earnings over time. large capital already knows how to do it. possibly everyone will be glad to have more time off in the beginning, but if in a while it turns out that there is not adequate fixed fees and the repayment of the debt additional free time will should be devoted to gainful work. Whether it's working with the same boss or moonlightingThat's what it's all about. Rather, it is the first, due to the fact that employers increasingly usurp the right to supervise what an worker does in his spare time. possibly it's not going to work out in spite of request and desire. There will be another argument for raising the retirement age:
So you can all pay your loans before you die
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Subscribe for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
Images as usual generated by AI on NightCafe portal
