Elections in Poland A. D. 2023 did not make a geopolitical and systemic alternate for Poles. This alternate was ruled out above all by the parliamentary arrangement of power and opposition before the elections.
It seemed, however, that it would be created by a severely experienced rigors of pandemic society—in addition, weary of the constant fighting of these 2 sides, bound by the formula: erstwhile you regulation and not decision ours, and erstwhile we and not decision yours.
It seemed that it would force politicians to break the tragic duo for Poland PO/KO-PiS, who selected smaller groups to their governments as their appetizers. Elections gave the chance to advance a fresh anti-system formation, as well as to give specified a profile to the Confederation, which already existed in the Polish political establishment. The first chance was taken by people focusing around president Siemianowice Śląski Raphael Pech, recording the batch in February 2023 Poland There is One. Within a fewer months they managed to organize it in many places of Poland, registry an election committee, prepare a clear right-wing patriotic program and be – despite completely unfavourable circumstances – in the awareness of Poles with the consequence 1.63. If PJJ maintains this dynamics and outlines its anti-systemism in the geopolitical and civilisation sphere, it has the chance to take over a large part of the PiS electorate, disappointed by the vassal policy of this party's submission to the US.
In the second case, not only did the Confederacy not become an anti-system formation, but on the contrary, its leaders made a decision towards the centre of the reigning duopol. As a result, the Confederation lost its identity not only ideological-political but besides axiological-cultural. She accepted for her business card compromised in the modern planet neoliberal lans, and for the precedence of Polish abroad policy the transatlanticity. This was measured by the scale of hatred of Russia, presented by the current co-chairs of this formation: Sławomir Mentzen “I never liked Russia. I am anti-Russian) and Krzysztof Bosak ("I want Russia all the worst"). Transatlantic rusophobia of leaders was demonstrated in the infamous paradigm: hatred of Russia – acceptance of neo-Bander Ukraine.
This paradigm resulted in a directive to hide "anti-Ukrainian" during the elections Grzegorz Braun and earlier demonstration in the flap of Mr. Bosak of the Ukrainian ribbon as a sign of support for neo-Banderian power in Kiev. The authority, which not only strengthened the revival of Ukrainian Nazism, but besides abolished all independent political organizations and parties, as well as the language of national minorities surviving in Ukraine – with Russian leadership. Recently, it banned the activities of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, not even communist power. In this context, there can be no anti-systemality of the Confederation. The attitude of its leaders towards Ukraine can be summed up by the acquainted term: “they have lost a good chance to stay silent” to which Jacques Chirac rated Poland's support for the 2003 US invasion of Iraq.
It is besides not justified to indicate the 3rd Way as a 3rd political force, breaking the po-PiS dual. It is only an electoral coalition of 2 different groups, with 2 different programs, 2 different parliamentary clubs. What combined these currents for the election period was simply bordering hatred of the Law and Justice. She besides connects the 3rd Way with the Civic Coalition and even the Left. Separately, both Simon Holovniaand Władysław Kosiniak-Kamish, they present the smaller groups listed in the prevailing arrangement, doomed to the function of entrees in the victorious power camps, declaring unconditional support for transatlantic globalisation and destroying our national awareness of rusophobia.
Those who claim that the circular table is the fight for power between the Washington organization – PiS – and the Brussels organization – PO/KO. In the global sphere, these 2 parties were not, and inactive no alternative. Even a medium-oriented Pole knows that the Law and Justice organization straight pursues the interests of the US, while the PO/KO – the interests of the German-managed Brussels, which, on fundamental issues of geopolitics and civilization – and above all the celebrated safety – depends entirely on Washington.
This dependence has caused the EU to lose its function as an crucial political player in the global dimension and as a mediator in planet War III threatening war conflicts: Ukrainian-Russian and Israeli-Palestinian. Moreover, the degradation of the EU is even more visible in the sphere of civilization and axiology. The effects of the United States force in this area are lamented – the US managed to impose its moral collapse on Europe, which full implemented the anti-Christian program of the 1968 American cultural revolution guru – Herbert Marcuse.
Virtual sovereignty
Polish duopol was built on an American model and subjected to American dependencies. This witness is not only the expanding presence of United States troops in Poland, but besides the public directives for Polish authorities from the US embassy in Warsaw. Shows of this contrary to the rules of activity of abroad embassies in the country gave Georgette Mosbacher. Her successor Mark Brzeziński Even more foreignly, he teaches Polish authorities. His intervention in the defence of the American – anti-Polish and anti-Christian – TVN went into history. The president of Poland was able to reduce the size of abroad influences in our country and turn the accompanying propaganda of globalists down with a single signature of the Act eliminating this outbreak of constant criticism of Poles and their national and spiritual traditions.
He did not do so due to the fact that he succumbed to the inadmissible diplomatic pressures of an ambassador of a abroad state in defence of the interests of this state's tv station. Therefore, KRRiT could easy extend TVN's activity in Poland for another 10 years in November this year. The image of this vassalization is completed by Americanization in the sphere of culture and civilization, shaped on the foundation of transatlantic globalism. In his program, the associated ideologies of LGBTQ+, environmentalism and transhumanism entered into the anthropological sphere.
Poland has caught up with Europe in the process of American cultural and social life, and, contrary to PiS propaganda, has not taken any steps to ban these post-humanist ideologies on the foundation of law. Polish cinemas and mass media flood American production – and related EU production – promoting not only the mentioned ideologies, but besides the manufacture serving them and the surrogacy trade. So the top slavery in human past – buying children in the embryo. The only way to escape these post-humanist utopias would be through the BRICS option, rejecting in its programme the concept of any cultural-civilization enslavement. A long queue has already been created pending the admission to the BRICS community, having its own bank and replacing the dollar with national currencies in trade. However, in Poland no 1 talks about the anticipation of improvement in cooperation with this community. Polish establishment prefers discredited neoliberalism of transatlanticism...
Defrauded Nationals
The deficiency of electoral and post-election alternatives hit the most endeck environments, having no organization representation in the parliament since the LPR. Anti-systemism of LPR, referring to heritage Roman Dmowski – like another anti-systemism of Self-defense – was so crucial and unwavering that the remaining political forces considered it a immense threat to the circular Table Agreement and an unbeaten obstacle to the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty. The bill was simple: without the votes of the LPR and self-defense the ratification of this anti-Christian fundamental law of the EU would not pass in the Polish parliament.
Therefore, the clubs PO, PiS, SLD, PSL and the RNN wheel pushed the dissolution of the Sejm, shortening its word by 2 years. That's how the coalition of fear for the incorruptible parties arose. The LPR and Self-defense besides voted in favour of introducing a provision to the Polish Constitution on the protection of the life and wellness of unborn children, torpedoed by the coalition of fear. These actions of anti-systemic groups in the cultural-civilization sphere entered the textbooks of past and Polish patriots remember them. But no 1 remembers the taxes at the time – idée fix neoliberal options with the Confederate at the forefront.
Many Poles who erstwhile voted for the LPR tied their political hopes with the Confederation in which the National Movement was located. As it turned out, he's only by name. He pretends to be a tradition of national democracy, as the March of independency pretends to be Poland's sovereignty – that's why it can be said to be a march of pretend independence. If the national trend in the Confederation were authentic, the thought profile of this formation would should be different – above all in global politics, taking into account Roman Dmowski's message about the request to build good relations with Russia. If the “nationals” had not pretended to be nationalists, the liberal trend in the Confederacy would gotta co-operate with the Endec option, for which Poland's economical improvement programme created Adam Doboszynski – inspired by the ideas of Augustinism and Tomism. If his economy of mercy and criticism were to be known both to socialism and to "immoral capitalism," Mr Mentzen would not have shouted in the run specified antisocial slogans as the degrading school children's education for which parents would receive a education voucher from the state – that is, taxpayers' money.
If he had read R. Dmowski's “Germany, Russia and the Polish issue”, he would not have proposed to Poles a German model of sick money in medicine. He would not preach the utopian thesis that not only the economy, but besides the individual man is determined by taxes. He would not minimize the function of the state to specified an degree that it could be said that it disappeared in the Confederacy programme. In turn, if the National Movement had ensured in this program a mention to the Endecian tradition, there would not have been specified liberal-libertarian movements in the campaign.
Hidden for the run period, Grzegorz Braun was absolutely not curious in the promotion of the Endek ideas, as his organization was besides "minimised" by the Confederate authorities. He confirmed this respective times in his post-election speeches, complaining about the unjust parity of his organization in its authorities. He besides had time to identify the outside enemy who took distant his candidates' votes: it was PJJ. Of course, he did not blame himself for anything, and he was 4 years old to organize the strong structures of his organization in the field and to break distant from the Confederacy. He preferred to keep in it an uncomfortable niche, from which he went out on seismic happenings, bringing advertising exclusively to him.
The formation of Mentzen and Bosak not only did not fulfill the hopes of the Endek communities, but even caused them to be corrupted and outraged. The reasons for this extremist change of attitude towards the Confederacy are obvious. The Confederacy's fault, however, is not collective, but – according to the assumptions of Christian personalism – individual and lies with those who have given it an ideological-political form and promoted it in the media. They not only ran an highly liberal socio-economic programme and russophobia, which went hand in hand with unconditional acceptance of the bander's Ukraine, which resulted in Poland's aid of tens of billions of PLN. They besides showed a deficiency of any ethos, visible among others in the conflict of generations – casus Janusz Korwin-Mikkego – or alternatively the ruthless elimination of seniors, made by the "young". They began by “hiding” his individual during the election run and ended up with suspensions in associate rights after the election, attributing him to a mediocre consequence of the group.
It was besides unethical to include household members on the electoral lists while not allowing specified persons as Sebastian Pitoń – deserved for wide communities in the fight against the Covid regime. The rule of not hiring household members in public entities – e.g. in state-owned companies – was broken by the Confederation in the case of a body deciding not about the finances of a company, but about the destiny of the state. Moreover, the election was utilized by this group for a peculiar interior conflict between the "young" and the seniors, an example of which was the placing on the same list of Mr Bosak's wife against Janusz Korwin-Mikkem. Her entry to the Sejm was announced as a large success of the Confederacy. Ms. Bosak did not take the votes of the PiS or the opposition, but took only the founder of her group, eliminating him from the Sejm, which with the support of the influential Ordo Iuris, undisclosed in the biogram Wikipedias of legal college sponsors in the US and in Brussels, and above all against the attack on Corwin, was not unusual. Additional moral doubts arise from the fact that the wife of the Co-Chairman of the Confederacy competed in the Sejm in an advanced pregnancy and already during the electoral campaign, not participating in meetings with voters, became an example of a teardrop between the perfect of motherhood and the perfect of patriotic service in parliament.
According to the first woman, promoted by Ordo Iuris, in Mrs Bosak's situation, temporarily resigns from her professional career for the sake of the child. The discrepancy between the ideas of this institution and the attitude of its typical in the Sejm is large adequate that for Ordo Iuris this representation is not a bull's-eye but a box or a false start. On the another hand, post-election performances in the media of Mrs Bosak's husband, aspiring to the function of Deputy Marshal of the Polish Sejm, rise not only moral doubts, but besides cabaret laughter. In 1 specified stunt, Mr. Bosak threatened PiS politicians with settlement and imprisonment, announcing that there would be paragraphs on them. The thought of billing ruling teams is right, but has been ridiculed by a MP who has no substantive competence to do so due to the fact that he has no law degree or any other. In addition, he represents the smallest club in the parliament and in coalition puzzles of the future government plays no role.
The post-election reflections of Poles must not end in pointing out the deficiency of alternatives in Poland. The Reich of readers of “Polish Thoughts” and the environments concentrated in “Polish Thoughts” Clubs say Confederation “adieu”! They are adequate possible – above all intellectual – to build their own national bias.
Prof. Anna Raźny
Think Poland, No. 47-48 (19-26.11.2023)
