In Polish media, a lamentation about the forced resignation of members of the advisory committee of the CDC on vaccines has late developed. This is expected to consequence in a immense threat to the wellness and life of Americans. Contrary to what they're telling us, this decision is for the wellness of Americans.
The following is simply a translation of Robert Kennedy Jr, the secretary of HHS (the bolds in the text are mine). In the title of summary passage:
The most outrageous example of ACIP's malicious negligence is his stubborn reluctance to request appropriate safety tests before recommending fresh vaccines for our children. An obedient American kid presently receives 69 to 92 regular vaccines (depending on the brand/imposed dose) from conception to 18 years of age. This is an increase compared to 11 injections in 1986.
https://x.com/SecKennedy/status/1932580198198964241
Yesterday, I retired 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices or ACIP, an external CDC panel that bears serious work for adding fresh vaccines to the recommended agenda of kid vaccination.
In the coming days, I will usage this platform to announce fresh members who will fill ACIP. no of these people are going to be ideological anti-vaccination. These will be highly qualified doctors and scientists who will make highly crucial decisions about public health, utilizing evidence-based decisions with objectivity and common sense.
I will besides tweet examples of historical corruption in ACIP to aid the public realize why this cleansing was necessary.
The most outrageous example of ACIP's malicious negligence is his stubborn reluctance to request appropriate safety tests before recommending fresh vaccines for our children. An obedient American kid presently receives 69 to 92 regular vaccines (depending on the brand/imposed dose) from conception to 18 years of age. This is an increase compared to 11 injections in 1986.
ACIP recommended each of these additional vaccines without the request for placebo-controlled studies for either. This means that no 1 can scientifically find whether these products prevent more problems than they cause.
Many vaccine promoters questioned this claim. They're always wrong. Last week, CNN, which turned into a shameless large Pharma propagandaist, triumphantly announced that it had evidence that my message that "there were no placebo-controlled safety studies for any regular vaccines" was false. CNN has happily announced that it has found 257 placebo-controlled studies for regular vaccines.
So let me deconstruct CNN's claims for a second. Warning: this post can only be bearable to discipline geeks like me.
CNN's wrong. No regular CDC injection was authorised in children based on a placebo-controlled study. In cases where the vaccine was utilized as a control, it was never authorised on the basis of a placebo-controlled study. That's not a guess. It's a fact based on FDA clinical trial data. (See http://sirillp.com/noplacebo). As Secretary of HHS, admitting this pathetic fact is part of my promise of extremist transparency.
The 257 studies cited by CNN unwittingly reflect the deficiency of safety studies underlying the CDC schedule. Despite CNN's global efforts to get data from placebo-controlled studies (in line with FDA/CDC, a ‘inert substance’*), this list, at first glance, shows that 236 studies clearly did not usage an ‘indifferent’ safety comparator in a survey to licence an injected regular vaccine for children in the CDC schedule.**
In the case of the another 21 studies which, on the CNN list, claim to have utilized an inert injection, 9 clearly did not:
• RCT 251, 252 (Varivax) injected antibiotics, neomycin – not inert.
• RCT 84, 97 (HPV-16 and 16/18) injected an aluminium adjuvant – not inert.
• RCT 215 (Almevax) injected another vaccine – not indifferent.
• RCT 55 (lyophilized PedvaxHIB) injected lactose, aluminium adjuvant and thiomersal – inert.
• RCT 197 (salka vaccine) injected solution 199, synthetic tissue culture, ethanol, phenolic red, antibiotics and formalin – inert.***
• RCT 168 (MMR Dow) injected full vaccine without virus, including all stabilisers, antibiotics, diluent, preservative and buffers – indifferent.****
• RCT 189 (Menveo) injected Tdap+physiological salt or Menveo+ physiological salt – indifferent.
For the remaining 12 of these studies, in which a neutral vaccine may have been given, no of them was a survey that could be relied on erstwhile registering a regular vaccine in the CDC children vaccination schedule:
• RCT 170, 171, 172 (MMR VaxPro), 228 (PVC11), 136 (Vaxigrip), 242 (Antitetanus) and 122 (Chinese flu vaccine) tested vaccines that were never registered in the US and were not reliance on erstwhile the vaccine was registered in the USA.
• Studies RCT 124 (Fluzone IIV3), 102 (WVV/SPV) and 188 (Menveo) were carried out after the registration of each appropriate vaccine and were so not utilized for their registration.
• RCT 176 (pig vaccine) was not utilized by the FDA for the registration of the current MMR vaccine. (See clinical trial study MMR-II in link above.)
• RCT 53 (PRP-D) was a vaccine withdrawn shortly after its introduction and was not FDA-based erstwhile licensing any vaccine in the US.
Although these 12 studies were not based on licensing a regular vaccine in the CDC schedule, they reflect that a placebo-controlled trial of the vaccine is possible. They besides reflect what you can learn erstwhile you take a placebo.
For example, RCT 136 showed ineffective vaccine; RCT 122 showed that “serious adverse reactions occurred in 69 (0.6%, 95% CI 0.5–0.8) vaccine-vaccinated subjects compared to 1 vaccine-vaccinated individual (0.1%, 0–0.2) placebo” and RCT 124 showed that “the hospitalisation rate was actually higher in the [Fluzone IIV3] vaccine group than in the placebo group”.
Unfortunately, placebo-controlled studies are not conducted and were not reliance on them erstwhile FDA issued a licence for vaccines for injection in childhood or erstwhile ACIP recommends adding an injection to the regular CDC schedule.
CNN would have come to the same conclusion if the FDA documentation for each vaccine had been reviewed alternatively of relying on a random, community-made net list. The CNN list ironically proves the deficiency of adequate safety studies on regular vaccines for children.
It's time to halt playing games like fake "we have you" CNN. We went from 3 regular injections to the first year of age in 1986 (in the year of adoption of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act) to 25 regular injections to the first year of age in 2025 (which now excludes COVID-19 vaccine). Due to the 1986 Act, each of these products, with the exception of one, was developed by companies knowing that they would almost never be held liable for serious damage.
During the same period, there has been a sharp increase in chronic diseases in our children, most of which are caused by dysregulation of the immune system. If we are to identify the vulnerability that causes this outbreak of autoimmune diseases, we must exclude products administered dozens of times to young children, in peculiar to modify the immune strategy as possible culprits.
Our infants and children deserve the best possible safety tests to guarantee their safety. We should take care of any kid who may be injured by 1 of these products, as well as any kid who may be injured by an infectious disease. We gotta defend all the children.
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Subscribe for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
References to cited materials
* https://fda.gov/media/130326/download ("Placebo, defined as inert substances without pharmacological activity, are commonly utilized in double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trials").; https://fda.gov/media/71349/download ("placebo control project, by ... inclusion of neutral treatment groups..."); https://cdc.gov/vaccines/glossary/ (Placebo: A substance or treatment that does not affect surviving beings, usually utilized as a comparison to a vaccine or medicine in clinical trials.)
** While the above applies to injectable vaccines, the list cited by CNN besides includes 10 studies of rotavirus vaccine administered as oral drops, but no of these studies utilized only saline drops. Instead, RCT 205, 207, 208, 210, 213 (Rotarix) contained dextrate, sorbitol, amino acids, modified average Eagle Dulbecco, calcium carbonate and xanthan gum; RCT 211, 212 (RotaTeq) contained polysorbate 80, sucrose, citrate and phosphate; and RCT 206, 214 (Rotavac) contained neomycin sulphate, canamic acid sulphate, trehalose, lactoalbumin hydrolysate, human albumin, potassium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate, and trisodium citrate dihydrate. The list besides included 3 samples of the influenza inhalation vaccine; the controls in RCT 104 were OPV+salt saline or LAIV (vaccine), so no of them were indifferent; in RCT 106, the control "composed of average aqueous fluid collected from uninfected eggs stabilised with sucrose-phosphate-glutamate"; and in RCT 109, the control was "the nasal spray of the soak liquid of the egg containing sucrose-phosphate-glutamate".
*** It should be noted that current polio vaccines utilized in the US are different from the polio vaccine developed by Jonas Salk in the 1950s. — which was withdrawn in the 1960s. — inter alia, due to the fact that the presently utilized polio vaccines are ‘bred in Vero cells, a continuous line of kidney cells of monkeys bred on micro-carriers’.
The Salk survey was so not the basis for obtaining a licence for any current polio vaccine.
https://fda.gov/media/75695/download; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6740101/;
https://
**** Dow Chemical's MMR vaccine utilized different strains than any licensed MMR vaccine in the USA, and all subjects were vaccinated after 14 days of safety review in this study.