Last Declaration by the Dicastery of religion Fiducia supplicans (but this is just another consistent step), as well as the fast onsets of the moral revolution and the almost chaos in the judiciary in our national backyard make you think about order and mess. Are these states equally good? Is putting order in public space a form of oppression? The text does not talk about chaos in the latest teaching of the Church or legal mess in Poland. However, his general view can be applied to each of these matters. A mess as another form of order, an perfect electorate with the head of a kid or a faithful 1 with no problem with the contradictions in the teaching that it applies to a happy (apparently) man. but surviving outside of reality.
From the point of view of the child, the parent's desire to bring order to the children's area is simply a fantasy of the other. The kid finds himself perfectly in his mess even if he has problem uncovering parts of toys or equipment. Order is of no value to him, nor does it seem peculiarly useful. Continuing attention to the request to clean or even to make it dependent on access to pleasant activities or tasty snacks appeals to the child’s imagination, as long as the parent survives possible screams and discussions, but does not change his offspring’s reasoning about the very legitimacy of cleaning, and it is only something that cannot be avoided.
Of course, the parent himself can bring order in his area much easier, faster, more accurately and without going through discussions with his child. However, he tries not to do so in order to teach his kid obedience and to anchor the habit of keeping order. Unlike his comfort, he appreciates the advantages of order and good habits. In theory, he could wave his hand and let the kid live in a mess that would be equalized only for the intent of sleeping in a bed without a pile of toys and another ad hoc needs (a chair celebrated for many representatives of children and youth with clothes that translates into a bed, for example, erstwhile a chair needs to be lent to a colleague or cousin who comes to visit is simply a akin example). A kid would perfectly last by controlling only the part of the mess that is temporarily undesirable. I guess it's only a visit to a home of possible or actual sympathy that can work on a juvenile better than parental harassment and mess is unthinkable. This does not mean that cleaning is done as best as possible (you can yet put any things out of sight in a closet or a bed linen box rather quickly).
The parent sees the substance differently and understands that keeping the order on the table is not enough, that he makes good habits it translates positively into the time allocated for cleaning erstwhile needed (the arrival of guests is simply a large opportunity). He besides wants to teach his kid to be systematic before he becomes a teenager and sometimes cleans up due to a visit to the object of his sighs. It's not going to happen in a four- or five-year-old's life. So there is simply a chance to reduce the permanent mess in the nursery by about 10 years. From a parent's perspective, it's a game worth a candle. Especially since this medal has 2 sides. We clean before visiting guests, but we besides anticipate to be welcomed to a clean-up place erstwhile we are guests ourselves. We anticipate order in the workplace, amusement places, clinics, churches, shops. In many of these places, people are liable for the cleaning and are paid for it, but in another places it requires individual else's commitment. We realize well that social coexistence is based on respecting each another and creating more pleasant conditions for ourselves to live in the places we usage together. possibly we would not halt liking any for always leaving a mess behind, the cleaning of which falls on individual else, but it reduces the comfort of utilizing a common place (such as kitchen at work). By letting 1 individual leave a mess or burden ourselves or individual else with extra cleaning, or even others quit cleaning after themselves by thinking, “If they leave a mess in front of me, I will not clean up after someone” and rather rapidly the mess becomes the norm. erstwhile people who care about order become a margin it's truly hard to return to order without a greater effort from individual who acts altruistically or individual who is forced or paid to reconstruct order.
The problem is that the sensitivity to disorder is decreasing and the mess becomes the norm, so that no 1 will protest the mess over time, but only avoid it as far as possible. any people will think it's the difference between order and mess. We go back to reasoning of children who do not see the values in order and we can halt seeing the differences between 1 and the other, putting them on the same level. In theory, it doesn't substance if someone's a messer or a pedant or anyone in between until it's not about others. It doesn't substance to the guest whether the host cleans regularly or only before his visit, if then the order is. In the mill kitchen there is already a problem and unpleasantness resulting from the mess affects not only the messier. What if we start preaching that a mess is equal to a state of order and you can't criticize a mess like this in public space? What then? After all, by abstrahing from literal order, this is more and more common in many places. You can't miss it.
