So-called. The election run is about warming emotions, in presidential elections – where they have “face” of circumstantial candidates – these emotions, naturally, are much stronger1 And in the second round, they're heated to maximum. Maximum, let's add, negative – "but not", "there can't win" are typical slogans that both camps are losing their winnings. And despite manifest hatred of the “other side”, despite the mud and fabricated accusations2 both sides have a common goal: to get as many people as possible to urn, to sustain the strategy in this way fraud as if the people had an influence. And the more people go, not so much “mandate” [President] stronger” but stronger system. The greater attendance the more calmly the machers can sleep on this strategy due to the fact that advanced attendance means that the people sleep deep sleep and that until the next election games the people are out of their minds. Can you imagine what it would be like if only 20% of the population were elected, in which panic would actually get into dealing cards – as well as puppets, which, playing the "political stage", carry out for us, the audience, this theatre?
In order to keep the system, they heat the atmosphere by highlighting the maximum differences between candidates, through harsh rhetoric, through the repeated every-election slogan, that these are “not average elections”, that “they will decide the destiny of Poland” – and so on.
However, these differences are, in fact, apparent at this phase due to the fact that both candidates are candidates to the system, agreeing on the most crucial issues for the strategy specified as:
- The leading function of Jewsworldwide and the inferior function of goys, including Poles,
- the subsidiary function of Poland, or more precisely the designation of its at least limited sovereignty if not its façade character,
- maintenance of the anti-Polish strategy of fiscal oppression, powers of various officials, force for full control of economical turnover (cash countering, electronicisation of JPK, etc.),
- vaccine communicative – WHO Pact, good vaccinations and wonderful, forced vaccination of children,
- Green communicative – global warming as a consequence of human action, which must be prevented,
- A servile attitude towards Ukraine, a servile attitude towards the US and the EU – and she baked hatred of Russia.
It is irrelevant completely – apart from the emotional layer – that there are any differences of accents here. That, for example, Mr. Nawrocki bows to the gentlemen of America and Mr. Trzaskowski alternatively with the 1 from Berlin or Brussels. Or that possibly Mr Nawrocki of Russia hates sincerely and Mr Trzaskowski most likely pretends to hate, due to the fact that he told and pays off, and if it were worth it, he would love Russia. Or that Mr Nawrocki would like to strangle us and our economy a small slower as part of the "CO2 reduction" and Mr Trzaskowski would want to strangle us and our economy faster.
And this could be mentioned – and we should remember – as 1 PO said at the minute of forgetting – “what harm is it to promise?” Finally, the heroic hero, patriot, Lech Kaczyński, besides signed the anti-indulgence treaty “because there were pressures”. How do we know what Mr. Nawrocki will sign as “the pressure”? How do we know that the lans on a "strong man" (kibol, setup, etc.) are not fake?
In fact, only in relation to perverts and intellectual diseases (the alleged "transgenderism") can I fishy that Mr Nawrocki could act as a president in rule differently from Mr Trzaskowski. Is it worth it, though? Join fraud And go vote? I don't think so.
Therefore, I would like to remind you that contrary to appearances, there are only 2 possibilities: to vote for Trzaskowski (To do that, you should be a truly utmost moron.) or vote for Nawrocki (maybe with any disgust). There's option three: not go at all and do not sign on this fraudulent system, end on 1 June with a clean conscience – and with a clear conscience, without a burden on the “choice of lesser evil” to observe further developments.
In this text I thin more over Mr Nawrock. Why? due to the fact that in the case of Mr.Trzaskowski, just perceive to what he says – and what he said to know that he is simply a individual whose decent man would not shake hands.
- I would point out that it is easier for people to support a peculiar man than the "party line" – that is due to the fact that man was not created for democracy. ↩︎
- If he accuses anyone of various demeanors of Tusk and swears that it's true, then we can accept, based on experience with this individual, these are vicious lies. ↩︎
