The current power shows that people are stupid. And for idiots and idiots to satisfy even the most rabid gender.
PDistrict rokuratura w Warszawie to give opposition to expanding votes binding the death of late Barbara Skrzypek with an earlier proceeding by 2 days published the minutes of the hearing.
It's worth looking at this document.
1.
The protocol consists of 9 printed pages (in the fresh court-prosecution office called cards). As we remember, the standard A4 page contains 1800 characters (including spaces).
Different – standard means 30 lines with 60 characters in each. A small more denser comes out in our editors. The page in the editor I usage contains 34 lines with 97 characters in each (Partition Liberation Serif 12).
So my website is 83% bigger than standard.
Meanwhile, the protocol page (card) contains 31 lines with 89 characters in each. So it's 84% of mine.
So if I wanted to rewrite the full published protocol, it would only take me 7 and a small more than half of the page.
The editor says it's about 2,500 words.
In accordance with the protocol, the proceeding started at 10 p.m. and ended at 14.40 p.m.
That's 280 minutes. That's 9 words a minute. Meanwhile, the average amount of words spoken by man is...120 to 150 words at the same time.
Of course, an amendment must be made to save the words spoken by late Barbara Skrzypek. But that would mean that as a protocolant, Ewa Wrzosek is completely useless. Even with 1 finger per minute, you can compose 3 times more words.
2.
I don't know where it came from that the protocol published proves there's no connection between the witness' death and the course of the operation.
Such an opinion could be based solely on recording the electronic activity.
The protocol ignores the questions asked by the witnesses The Austrian victim.
You can see it at first glance.
The evidence only reflects the answers to questions that are not included in it!
Why?
Were they not preceded by threats to extend criminal proceedings by presenting charges against the late Barbara Violins?
For example, was she not tried to persuade her to become a alleged tiny Crown Witness and the burden of Jarosław Kaczyński?
After all, it is common cognition of what content he has placed (and places) on the X portal, etc., associate of the Gierty, which is highly powerfully active in the matter.
3.
Please read carefully the answers of the witness Barbara Fiddler to the questions asked. After all, it is beyond uncertainty that additional questions have been asked.
All you gotta do is look at sheet 5 of the protocol.
Because that's the practice. I erstwhile testified in court as a witness. 2 sides of my evidence contained 7 or 8 sentences starting with a message that means. 3 were even in a row.
The court just didn't compose down their questions. March 12 was surely the same.
So how do we treat the presented document????
Undoubtedly, 1 of the reasons for this is the impudent lie of Cuchnowski.
But he's got us utilized to lying insolently without blinking his eyelid.
So did the Gierty.
On the another hand, if the presentation of the protocol for the intent of the territory lawyer (although I think the decision was made above) was to put an end to speculation, as Ewa Wrzosek and the 2 attorneys of the Austrian victim contributed to the death of the late Barbara Skrzypek, then it is essential to state with all force that the action failed.
The questions not only remained, but in time they will be put more and more harshly as Bodnar's squad continues to compromise.
I don't know if it's reached the hot wardens yet. compromise 13 DecemberThat another effort to intimidate society failed.
Let's just hope that, before the neocommun falls, it won't be able to push us into a civilizational collapse like 1949-89.
21.03 2025
You can find the protocol at this address:
]]>https://www.gov.pl/web/po-warszawa/publication-protocol-interview-sw...]]>
photo: facebook
