I'll make a post-election manifesto so the discussion doesn't spread over the offtops. No, I don't regret my vote together, as a left-wing voter, I'm utilized to failing.
I'd like to at least have the luxury to vote completely according to my beliefs. In 1991, Ikonowicz (whose signatures I collected) lost in the idiotic coalition “Solidarity of Work” which avoided the word “Levice” and alternatively referred to “the social teaching of John Paul II” (shitting ya I am not). That was worse.
Like all Polish selectioner after the mundial, Grzegorz Schetyna talks about “the first half of the match”. The superiority of football over politics is that in football this is usually already the farewell speech of the squad coach, and now the maestro Schettino will lead us to another triumph (moral).
Some time ago I wrote on my blog that the main problem of opposition is that the life of Average Kowalski has improved over the last 4 years. I besides see it in my social bubble, dominated by people suspended somewhere between the LMC and the MMC.
In a household where spouses (partners) make a surviving with 3 with a hook, 500+ was a salvation. Thanks to him, specified a household could yet catch a second breath – go with the children to the zoo, buy a fresh TV, go on vacation.
In addition, PiS expanded 500+ just before the election and further tightened the pensioners. This meant that large groups of electorate had to have the feeling that by voting for opposition they were voting against their own stomach.
The opposition, in addition, went on to check itself out, fighting 500+ between 2015 and 2016, with the eruptions of the cheapest demagoguery. Do you remember those “reportaries” about the rabble that took 500+ and went to the sea, what makes a well-known actor uncomfortable?
Do you remember those economical authorities that said that erstwhile the Sun enters the Twins trigon, 500+ will origin an economical crisis? Their horoscopes proved to be concertally unsuccessful: there was to be a giant deficit and hyperinflation, and here the zonk (and how much it can be defended that “not yet this year, but next year it was a wall-beton! ”
Opposition media, 1 day threatening the crisis (which did not come) and the another advocating the ban on the entry of rabble into the vacation centers of the "Nour fur Authorityten", themselves took the influence on society. present they can only convince the convinced.
Unfunny paralegal jokes about revolutionary tribunals, which will account for PiS (the stupidest text of this kind was made by Prof. Sadurski, but unfortunately he was not the only one), many people took it seriously. It was stupid and unnecessary: I have witnesses that from the beginning I have been fighting swarms of the series “you will sit!” or “state tribune!”.
One of the secrets of Kaczyński's win was casting on pretend leaders who met the basic condition: they were SYMPATIC.
I don't like president Duda either, but I objectively justice his sociotechnical talent. By making all his stupid faces of the series “sausage over sausage”, he lets his eye go to the electorate: showing that he only pretends to be a stiff for professional reasons, but actually he is his peasant.
People like good people. It's fundamentally tautology, but let's learn from it.
Schetina is not sympathetic. erstwhile he smiles, we get the impression he's playing a function in the scene. “14:31 – applause, president smiles, looks with a grin to the left, looks with a grin to the right, greets devotees; 14:32 – you can halt smiling, at ease.”
Duda and Szydło play archetypal characters that all Pole knows from his life – uncle and aunt, with whom we disagree in nothing, but in full we like to visit them due to the fact that it is LOVE. My aunt informs dumplings, my uncle pours, it's a party. Nobody talks about politics, due to the fact that why.
Komorowski is the embodiment of the other archetype of an evil uncle – 1 who toasts “the wellness of beautiful ladies and here present”. And the Schetina archetype of the chief, who says to the crew “you see, there is no money, there is simply a request for renunciation” (and he just gave himself a bonus).
If we don't want a constitutional majority for the Law and Justice in the fall, the Platform must besides do casting on sympathetic leaders. And these cool leaders must have a "Janie Kowalski, if you let us win, your life will improve in this peculiar way."
General slogans (that the constitution, that the regulation of law) simply do not win the election. Yes, they do work on people like me. But people like me would give the constitutional majority to Zandberg.
