Konrad Berkowicz, associate of the Parliament, during the discussion on the first reading of the civilian bill on amending the Social Retirement Act, on 25 January 2024.
– little than 3 years ago, the legal situation in Poland was that the individual who took care of the disabled kid and collected the existing care allowance lost this benefit if he took up his job. It was an obvious, inhuman scandal.
It was punishing the caregivers of people with disabilities for wanting to work hard to make extra money for their ward. possibly not full-time, possibly remotely. There are different possibilities. Generally, disabled people have limited opportunities.
And then, little than 3 years ago, The Confederacy has tabled an amendment to destruct this inhuman law. The PiS, in which the associate had just nodded, voted against. And she didn't support Mrs. Hartwich's project, which had a mouth full of clichés just now. Besides, you and all the pos didn't support it.
And now you're coming out here erstwhile you're in charge and defending the disabled. Explain it due to the fact that it kind of looks like it's not about helping the disabled, it's about helping erstwhile you can take credit.
By the way, don't say it in that speech you're talking in. You don't give anyone money. If you wanted to give, you'd spend all your pay on the disabled. You just vote to force taxpayers to transfer money to the disabled.
Less than 3 years ago, the legal situation in Poland was that the individual who took care of the disabled kid and collected the existing care allowance lost this benefit if he took up his job. It was an obvious, inhuman scandal. It was punishing the guardians... pic.twitter.com/KKJW4pu3qR
— Konrad Berkowicz (@KonradBerkowicz) January 25, 2024
