Pisowski Media Company

I was very happy to complain to the writers that we “did not build our media.” If I were Sakiewicz or Karnowski, it would make me sad (and Presidents said it at the “Gazeta Polska” event, which he insulted the hosts and guests of the team).

Of course, it can always be said that specified a tiny “From Things”, specified a modest “Potylica”, specified a thin Sakiewicz, against the powerful hyperpower of Agora and TVNu. It is said that 8 years have gone down, due to the fact that no 1 is reading or watching it anymore, the announcements of state-owned companies have been taken, and too Twitter and Jutub, the lord of the town, that is strength, not any "legacy media".

I'm mocking you, but of course here, the president is right. All these portals are laughter in the room, territory league compared to the extraclass with Onet, Gazeta.pl, Virtual Poland (and so on).

Once the writers in the public media and Orlenia get deserved Copenhagen (by the way, as shortly as possible), that's all the writing will have left. It's gonna be hard to win the next election.

According to colleague Czuchnowski is considered an effort to extract our city portal from Polandpress – as a basis for the creation of a written “media concert”, which was discussed by Presidents. I am a bit skeptical, for example, due to the fact that specified hastily transactions can be interpreted as an act to the detriment of the company – and after all, shortly the guarantees of impunity for the written kleptocrats will end. Besides, does the portal “ours” even play in the same league as Onet?

There's a paradox in the media. The least prestigious species of journalism, i.e. the news track, dispatch journalism, does not bring manufacture awards – but it builds the prestige of the service.

There are services we look at to get acquainted with someone's opinion. And the services we look into to keep up with the news. In my case it is mainly Onet and Gazeta.pl (and at your place? I will gladly learn recommendations!).

The media weakness of the left is manifested by the deficiency of specified a left-wing portal. Krypol, Oko and TOK FM (the most serious services treating the left with sympathy) is, however, first and foremost the publicist of opinion.

Once the writers are out of their possessions, they will be in a akin situation. It's not news services.

Here's the next paradox: even if our opinion publications are cultivated by stars with star rates, then as a full it is cheaper in production than news, produced mainly by trainees at minimum, or as a CV entry. News journalism as a full is damn expensive.

The explanation is simple – in order to make a Onetu clone, we request to start with a fewer twelve people. We can't push them all into garbage trucks, due to the fact that what we truly care about is their attachment to the workplace, so we can have any minimum predictability in managing human resources.

So if, for example, any golfer-longner offered me, let's say, 2 million zlotys to launch a left-wing service – I would dare him to prepare a blog-subcast, with opinions and comments. I'd request $2 million for the news service, but a year.

On the left, specified money will never be, due to the fact that whether we like it or not, we are doomed to any form of symbiosis with liberal media. But will the Presidents find them, especially cut off from the tit of the state-owned companies?

Liberal media, whatever they say, demonstrated that they can last without it. Today, I would say that these conventional media ("legacy media") have a more safe future than Twitter or do-patron initiatives.

Nius in conventional media are frequently of mediocre quality. I look mostly to complain. frequently these are pseudonoises of the kind "someone on Twitter wrote that" or non-news, like the legendary "libation in the square".

But they are. Even these “librations on the square” are more costly in production than “Stanowski hard about Bork” (sleep harder, solder!).

Moreover, launching specified a service requires any know-how. conventional media is simply a cemetery of unsuccessful projects, from which respective unsinkable ones emerged.
The thought of "Polish-wide media-based media-based media was already there". It was called “Poland The Times” and it died quickly, due to the fact that just not everyone can Be a Michnik.

Presidents don't have a good hand to choose their associates. Even his followers admit that – due to the fact that they worship Kaczyński, but Morawiecki or Duda only as long as they shine the brightness of the president's grace.

So I hope that even if any gold duck gave the president 20 million to launch the Pisov Media performance – as usual. The chief will make individual who will organize the PKN Gala for nineteen million, where Kaczyński will receive the president of the Year award all year.

And in 4 years' time at this gala, he will say again that failure is simply a consequence of the deficiency of a media company and that it must yet be built.