The era of liberalism's dominance over the full planet – started with an economical and ideological triumph over the socialist bloc in 1990 – no uncertainty it is leaving for lame. Then this large triumph of the West meant triumph and imposing on all the values and anti-values generated by Anglo-Saxon civilization. The strong hegemony of the alleged "progress at all costs" in our day no longer means fighting for a broadly understood technological modernization, but "pumping" alternatively caricatures of these "conquerors" – specified as gender, LGBT, transhumanism, and the fight for all the ointments of "release" from the basic principles of collective coexistence. This is simply a de facto acceptance of all nonsense and deviance. By the strength of things specified a primitive and destructive ideological message could not be full accepted by all centres of civilization, frequently boasting centuries-old tradition and profoundly embedded in the cultural fabric of their nation. As shortly as the period of fascination with technological advancement ended; and erstwhile its most crucial achievements were assimilated, the competition began and return to its own native roots. That's understandable. Thirty-year-old boom of pushy, one-dimensional liberalism goes slow to lame. It seems that the full planet is returning to a state before 1989, erstwhile there were 2 geopolitical centres of capitalist and socialist world. But the same way it won't be. presently there is no longer 1 or even 2 centres of force on the advice of empires-civilization. There are many of them, fresh ones are constantly appearing, and even more actors, sometimes not countries, aspire to this.
China, Russia, India and the Muslim planet under the leadership of Pakistan, Turkey and Iran have surely won political autonomy in addition to the US. Under the protectorate of China, the full of Africa is civilized. There are very crucial economical unification mechanisms in South America. In many cases these are already in advancement and irreversible. Technological advancement and the ease of communicating information make fresh centres no longer request institutions and mechanisms developed by existing pioneers from the US and Europe. For most operators, the “care” of old neo-colonial centres is an unbearable, costly burden that they would gladly get free of erstwhile and for all.
Since the 1980s, a single-polar order focused on the universalization of culture throughout the planet has left behind the demolition and degradation of local ethnos. Washed from local meanings and symbols developed for hundreds of years – communities were subjected to and are formed ideologically, most frequently a rape on their traditions. In fact, only those who managed to someway set up a dam and separate their values from the favored sewage of meanings in the ruling general transmission of mainstream media. Therefore, the departure from the single-polar, shallow dominant globalisation for 30 years has given many hope of genuine improvement – without the matrix given above, without false meanings and values. specified rebirth attitudes can be observed primarily in Muslim and Chinese cultures – always immune to news from the West. The remainder of the world, led by Russia, is besides slow trying to free itself from the corset of inexpensive pop culture.
Multicentricity has been a fact for respective years. There are surely many different centres of force that are able and conducting autonomous policies and do not care about US sanctions and warrants. India, China, Pakistan and Turkey buy Russian oil without hindrance and pay rubles. Iran, Syria, African states do not engage in US-proposed sanctions and prohibitions. South America besides tries to cooperate in various areas in its own way. It accelerates the dedollarization of transactions between the most crucial exchange cents. another countries are observing this and seeing crucial benefits for themselves, trying to circumvent the costs associated with the US and dollar. The unquestionable dominance of the Anglo-Saxon planet and the US has already become history. The U.S. is no longer a hegemon and has become 1 of many equal states that must search ground flooring and build coalitions with others.
The U.S. is not easy to quit the position of the only planet policeman to whom they have grown accustomed in the past 30 years. Tens of years of life beyond the state and continuous wars have resulted in a massive increase in government debt. Without this position and position in the global economy of the dollar – the US may not be able to cope. Without the ability to "pull" an artificially created dollar in neighbouring countries, an extended military complex and current expenditure cannot be financed. In turn – without the ability to task military power – the pool of buyers of toxic American currency can dramatically decrease.
Therefore, alternatively of a real austerity treatment, the elimination of external engagements, the return to industrialization of the state that we have faced behind Trump's presidency; during Biden's term, we observe only desperate and crude attempts to save the U.S. power position. They usage it without any embarrassing economic, media advantage and simply violent force. The U.S.-inspired war on Donbas has become an excellent chance to attack the European economy and impose its costly American energy resources through the Western elite. There was no hesitation in the acts of panic that were to blow up key critical infrastructure in Europe – the #NordStream pipelines. U.S. media centers in Western Europe were inciting war with all their might. Subsidiary governments – especially in east Europe, they were forced to block most of the existing East–West transport corridors hoping to get free of Chinese and Russian competition from European trade. In the media, the hysteria of war hazard has forced most countries in Europe to buy costly American weapons for decades, which will undoubtedly ruin national budgets.
However, apart from Europe and respective Anglo-Saxon countries, it is evident that no 1 seriously engaged in primitive anti-Russian narrative. Most of the countries of Asia, Africa, and South America, as well as the arabian states, are undoubtedly conducive to Russia, seeing a chance in its fight to break up the monopolar corset and build a fresh relation arrangement where they besides can take any crucial place.
In fact, America remained to manage only Europe, whose inhabitants – alternatively of the Asian and African populations – became objects of intensive economical exploitation. They gotta buy gas and oil from the US a fewer times more expensive, they are obliged to fight CO2, they gotta close their mines and power plants to destruct the carbon footprint. And here we are faced with the fundamental question of whether Europeans will proceed to want to walk in the increasingly dense keeracie imposed upon them by colonists from above the Potomac? After centuries of predominance in the world, will they become obedient serfs, workers for a bowl of rice – thanking the large sahib for the grace of the next month? There is much reason for Europeans not to rebel. Tens of decades of Anglo-Saxon brainwashing have mostly softened the ability of group interaction in emergencies. The towed Europe resembles the structure of a “paper” susceptible to all forms of manipulation, and imposed top-down, as holiness—democratism causes that even if there is an environment conscious of threats, it will immediately be covered with waves of idiotic actions manipulated by mainstream media.
However, Europe is not forever doomed to the function played for many years. The logic of the multicentric strategy makes even utmost losers look forward to crucial geopolitical changes that will come from outside. A multi-vector game of empires always gives a chance to change the unfavourable position and gain fresh – better ground floor. We see how China, India, Syria, Vietnam and Iran have changed. These countries have ceased to be peripheries and subjects of planet politics. They became as crucial as France, England, Germany or the USA. Multicentricity is simply a return to normality. A one-run recidivism – so destructive to the planet – will most likely not be repeated for long.
Peter Panasiuk
