John Paul II abolished the Code of Canon Law of 1917 and replaced it with a fresh 1 in 1983, which included the post-collaborative "pouring of the Holy Spirit." How can these changes be assessed after 42 years? In the text, I intend to focus solely on the subject of the sacrament of marriage, although all aspects of the Church's life have been infected, but this has affected married couples the most. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre has already warned that the corrupt canon law is much worse than the Second Vatican Council due to the fact that it is an introduction to the law of errors that gain legislative power.
On the Pch24 portal, an alarming article appeared, which informs about the leaping emergence of declarations of nullity of matrimony in Poland, which is becoming the leader in Europe: https://pch24.pl/kosciol-in-polska-bi-records-nounity-married-this-effect-reform-French/.
As we learn from the text “The main reason for the annulment of marriages in Poland is the deficiency of valid matrimony consent due to the inability to undertake crucial marital obligations. This is 96 percent of the cases.”
Although the portal points to the reforms of Pope Francis with pain, it should be stated that the provisions on the basis of which all matrimony can be declared invalid were introduced by John Paul II.
Let us see who under the fresh canon law is incapable to accept the sacrament of marriage: Kan. 1095 – Inability to marry are:
1 those who are deprived of adequate usage of reason;
2o those who are affected by a serious deficiency of judgement as to the importance of
the rights and obligations of the spouses transferred and accepted;
3o those who, for intellectual reasons, are incapable to take on crucial duties
married.
The first point should be without doubt; it is in accordance with common sense and natural law. On the another hand, it should be alarming for readers that the deficiency of discernment in obligations and matrimony rights as a reason for the annulment of marriage, has never been found in canon law before, it is simply a complete novema of John Paul II and results from his personalistic view of man.
It should be recalled that that all cases of incapacity to marry must happen before its conclusion, so that they deserve to be taken into account. In the meantime, you can only see whether or not individual will execute his or her marital duties after marriage. It is absurd to point to a deficiency of discernment in responsibilities and matrimony rights, due to the fact that that is simply a premarital course so that people can realize what matrimony is. There is no way under the fresh canon law to defend the inextricability of marriage, as it is impossible to prove that at the time of the adoption of the sacrament people were aware of the obligations and rights resulting from this, no 1 has any insight into the psyche and interior reasoning of individual people.
Imagine a akin provision in the case of the sacrament of priesthood and the mass declaration of the annulment of ordination on the basis of deficiency of discernment in priestly duties. all sane individual will say that the time for specified a time was before the adoption of the consecration, and we respond likewise in the case of marriage. The rights and obligations of matrimony can be recognized in all catechism which a Catholic has a work to know.
Finally, it is worth reminding everyone that even if the Church finds the voidness of marriage, but the grounds for the ruling were sucked off the finger, then in the eyes of God specified a ruling is not of value. The Church is not infallible in these matters, and matrimony is insoluble by the words of Christ the Lord: Anyone who delivers his wife, and takes another, commits adultery; and whoever takes a husband away, commits adultery. Luk 16,18
1. episode ("Prelude") of the documentary series "Neighbours. Last Witnesses of Ukrainian genocide in Poles”
