I have already posted an entry where I have touched on what I think and as the PO voter, a Catholic, sees: about his obligations concerning the defence of life. I besides spoke to PiS-owiec (conceived) and the voters of Poland 2050 (because the PiS betrayed the ideals of defending life (?) I didn't realize it here, due to the fact that after all, in a long process, but they stood (willing or not) PiS politicians in defence of unborn life.
Briefly: A lover of the erstwhile ruling organization stated that it was the Pis life defenders who lost and you had to agree to the condition of suspension that existed earlier. After all, now it will be happening like liberals with lefties will start killing children - by amending laws. Says the Catholic who goes to church. He chooses - the lesser evil, or the death of any unborn group playing political chess. He forgets about the decalogue, about the work to defend life, and what more his forgetfulness explains with good. After all, they wouldn't die if the Law and Justice were inactive in charge - they've already determined our fight for the defence of life. He's already predicted a sea of unborn blood. However, it is not crucial to me what he predicted (that it was surely due to these "fanatics", defenders of life; he lost his favourite organization - as if he had forgotten the dissatisfied ones who went to vote for PJJJ and about the powerful half-truth-based and manipulative mobilization of the another side, as if he had forgotten that the voters of Writing in the large majority were the defenders of life and the hair had already divided them from stopping supporting the organization that promised them this defence of life alternatively than fulfilling the promise). He did not realize that the consequence would pervert this much more complex. Moreover, he forgot his own declared faith, which dogmatically obliges him in the commandments - to defend life. I can't comment on it any another way than to admit it as a kind of selective moral thinking, based on completely inappropriate ethical-moral bases, where it wins confusion towards the political opponent, and its own spiritual obligations are thrown into the basket. Intellectual mistake and inability to rationally realize the duties and obligations of the Decalogue. Name fanaticism Defending the life of an unborn, defenseless kid is an absolute curiosium.
This is spoken by a technically educated man with a polytechnical diploma. I remind you: declaring as a Catholic and attending church at Holy Mass. Patriot and right-wing. Horrible.
The second image: a colleague who accused PiS of betraying the ideals of defending life, as well as blaming him for many another actions (also the issue of management during the pandemic), goes to fight this organization on the side of a individual starting from a coalition letter under the flag of Holownia, who very liberally sees issues related to allowing the kid to be killed in the womb. He doesn't see it. Sam belongs to the DK movement Light Life. However, it gives its voice and engages on the side of 1 of the coalitions of Poland 2050. That's expected to explain him. He's a coalition. His boss isn't Holovnia and his leader is PSL. Just due to the fact that there's no clear objection, he's not curious in breaking the coalition anymore. It is crucial that his MP, whom he supported defends life. At the same time, he does not see that through the support of this alternatively than another group - a peculiar coalition threatened this life. It's not a problem for him. He doesn't see it at all.
What should we choose as declared Catholics? What party? What imagination of the world? I'm out of many another activities of the erstwhile power, which I absolutely did not like and where I have repeatedly vented my discontent. A nation that murders its future generations is simply a lost nation. He's burying himself in the blood of innocents to usage literary tools here. And unfortunately, with large distaste, 1 must choose between the incorrect solution and the worse solution.
What can you do? You can only effort to change the party, the organization members, its ideology through direct commitment. But who can afford it, who has time? Who even believes this can work? However, we can do at least so much as defenders of life and Catholics, teeth to people like these above and this earlier lover of the Catholics, effort to explain something - especially if we have a common denominator, which is Catholic faith, a decalogue and knowing it literal. Not metaphors?
Murder is the death of an individual, unrepeated throughout the universe. The defence of this life is most important. So it stands much higher than what organization or another strategies there are no reasons why 1 would like to vote on the occasion of stepping on Life.
We Catholics should remember that.
The earlier entry I mentioned at the beginning: https://nie Correctni.pl/blog/piotr-shelagowski/no-kill-fight-about-life-what-call-electoral-po
