Tucker Carlson interviewed Vladimir Putin. I'm not going to mention and analyse the intelligence itself. You can find it at: https://tuckercarlson.com/the-vladimir-putin-interview/ And get my own opinion. Here I want to compose about what the very fact of interviewing and reactions to it are saying about the condition of Western democracy in which we are supposedly living, and Western supposedly free journalism.
Tucker Carlson was a longtime lead and host of the talk-show at Fox News — a conservative tv station. I compose about him as the leader, not the presenter, due to the fact that unlike the current model of tv journalism, he prepared his own content, presented himself and was liable for it. He struggled to bend to the restrictions imposed on him by the station's management and yet left it in August 2023. There are quite a few innuendos in the media about the reasons for this fact, but 1 can imagine that the main was open and loud opposition to authoritative narrative, which was said to have discouraged advertisers. He even allowed himself to make jokes about topics now being sacred cows. Many people may dislike the conservative views of a journalist, may not like him, but no 1 can deny him journalistic professionalism, integrity and courage.
He has not been ‘punished’ from the station, as his opponents sometimes claim. In the event of specified well-known media figures leaving, it is common practice to make a advanced clearance in connection with a contract prohibiting competition, at least for a time. This besides happened this time, so Tucker Carlson did not go to work for the competition, but himself became a competition for his erstwhile station. First on X/Twitter, and now besides has its portal: https://tuckercarlson.com/ and YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/@TuckerCarlson. Of course, Fox News did not like it and the station tried to sue Carlson for breaking the contract, but his lawyers rapidly explained that he was simply exercising his right to freedom of speech and freedom of expression. He committed not to work for the competition, not to keep quiet. Currently, any of his programs have ratings of respective million, higher than not only Fox News, but besides CNN. This clearly indicates a large request for real journalism, which they are incapable to satisfy propaganda tubes. I encourage you to visit Tucker Carlson due to the fact that many of his interviews and many of his guests are worth our attention.
Tucker Carlson late interviewed Vladimir Putin. Subjects of Western democracy for over 2 years have not had the chance to hear the voice and the views of this planet leader. Does he have nothing to say? He most likely did, but allegedly free media did not give us free planet citizens the chance to hear him. On the occasion of the interview, and even for a minute before him, Tucker Carlson was accused of acting badly, unethically and irresponsibly “giving Putin a platform to spread his propaganda”. Even the most feared can sleep peacefully, Putin himself admitted that: In the propaganda war, it is very hard to defeat the United States due to the fact that the United States controls all planet media and many European media. The eventual owner of the largest European media is American financial institutions.
For a moment, 1 might think that the charge of "giving a platform" is right, but a closer look reveals the second bottom. Putin's not the reason this is all about us. We should not have the chance to learn the arguments of the another side, due to the fact that then we could request translation from our chiefs and propaganda leaders. We're only expected to swallow propaganda on 1 side. The dark people do not deserve to know the different information and views of many parties, they do not have the right to decide for themselves, they should perceive exclusively to propaganda intended for them and support the things indicated. Put the Ukrainian flag on your social media account, support and don't ask questions. According to the American rulers of the Vietnam War, citizens should be treated as mushrooms, or kept in the dark and fed to dung. And that is the task of journalists of our time, not any irresponsible interviews and the transmission of uncensored information.
A very characteristic is the way the interview was presented by Polish media, erstwhile it could not be ignored. The interview is long, it takes over 2 hours, during which various topics were discussed. Of course, it's besides long for a tv station to be able to take care of all of this in 1 program. It would be naive to think that, for example, for a peculiar program, they would choose a subject, issue an interview, and then commentators would comment. This way, however, is unacceptable, gives the voice (i.e. a platform to spread propaganda) to the another party, and then individual after proceeding the full thing might disagree with authoritative opinions. You can't even give average people a chance to make their own opinions. It's dangerous for power. The right method is to show a 5-second video snapshot of something unrelated, then the commentator immediately shows en blocThat the full interview was pointless, and Putin's views were false and lying. They're trying to convince us that the leader of the planet power that de facto He's capable of defeating all NATO, knows nothing and has nothing crucial to say. (Despite Russia's economical blockade, the Russian army is presently firing 10 missiles on all Ukrainian. Russian missiles are their own production, while Ukrainian missiles are the product of joint efforts of all NATO).
Similarly to the media, the Polish Ministry of abroad Affairs behaved, posting on its website the exposing of “putin lies”. It's the same as the media policy of attacking a straw opponent. alternatively of letting the real adversaries speak, they make their own, attributing their own words to them. Defeating specified a crafted adversary and overthrowing his claims is no longer a problem. And the dark people are glad that ours have prevailed and of course will not think to test the facts, although it is possible. I remind you, I'm not saying that everything Putin said is right and true. I'm just saying that we should be able to justice it ourselves, and it's the journalists' occupation to aid us, not to push propaganda.
In Poland, anti-Russian propaganda is placed on the susceptible ground of eternal rusophobia. In matters related to Russia, all our past teaching is propaganda. What were the causes of the outbreak of the November Uprising? most likely the creation of the University of Warsaw and another akin repressions. In 1920, we resisted Russian aggression. It is said that through Vilnius the Bolsheviks wanted to scope Germany to support the revolution there. But in that case, what was Piłsudski doing under Kiev? The next 100 years are not adequate to accurately measure history. That is why the ruling parties are changing in Poland, but the communicative remains unchanged, which may seem to be true. For now, erstwhile I hear the voices of Polish journalists and politicians, I remind myself of Władysław Gomulka, who repeatedly contradicts from the grandstand: It is not true, as the American imperialists claim, that... Now it's the another way around. American imperialists have become an oracle, and their curlers are talking end-to-end Gomulka. Only then did we perceive to the enemy radio to get information from the another side, and now we remainder in blissful unconsciousness, swallowing authoritative propaganda like geese fattened on foie gras.
It would seem that after historical experiences the Polish society should be more oriented, that authoritative communicative is not revealed, scepticism must be maintained and everything checked. Is it not a gross example of a conflict of interest that the current abroad Minister is married to Anne Applebaum? Called a journalist, in fact, it is an hawk of an iconologist calling for successive wars to strengthen the regulation of the American empire. The minister and the instigator. How does this service the interests of Poland and Poles? The leaders of the United States, the United Kingdom and another NATO countries are leading us on a consecutive way to planet War III, and we are to follow them politely, not knowing what they say to us and supporting what they say to support us. It is in those countries that there is simply a greater difference of opinion than in Poland, demanding fact and protests against incitement to war. The hysterical reactions of the Western political elite clearly show that there are many things that they think citizens should not know or think about. For Tucker's sin, these elites called for his excommunication – the confiscation of a passport, the ban on travel, and even the initiation of criminal proceedings. writer is simply a threat.
Journalists Disoriented by writer Journalist
USA – Journalists across the country showed outrage and confusion after a video of a writer dealing with journalism appeared on the Internet. According to sources, the video published on the social media platform X shows a well-known writer Tucker Carlson deliberately and recklessly engaging in real journalism, no substance what harm a mindless show might do. [...]
https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/journalists-confused-by-journalist-doing-journalism
Journalists' comments are besides significant. They all know better how an interview should be conducted. They accuse Tucker Carlson of having no "control over the interview". In their opinion, he should not let the interviewer to express his views and explain his position. But he should interrupt and ask more aggressive questions. He should repeat the slanders cast by Western propaganda and have them explained. They had 2 years to go to Moscow and do their own interview. someway no 1 went, no of the propaganda doormen did.
Tucker Carlson has strong conservative views powerfully diverged from authoritative communicative on all matters and is not hiding with them. The Thursday comments he made were very popular among the audience advanced ratings, but they were at the same time a nightmare for Fox News, which was then attacked from all sides due to an unruly journalist. However, during interviews, his views stay in the shadows, with the voice being interviewed. Doesn't mean there's no question. Now, according to propaganda journalists, the art of intelligence should trust on something else. The Tok FM radio woman is simply a large example. He licks his ass erstwhile the guy's right and makes the right opinions, or he jams and takes the level erstwhile he dares to challenge the authoritative fairy tale that this woman serves. Either you're part of our propaganda or you're not here.
The knowing of the essence of journalism by Polish journalists is very well evidenced by their very contented statements erstwhile censorship of the net was introduced in Ukraine at the beginning of the war, including the blockade of Russian portals, but besides of independent American ones. Journalists demanded censorship and enjoyed it erstwhile it was introduced, does it not look absurd to you? individual will say it's war. The U.S. is fighting this war, but they're not blocking it. The first amendment inactive works. In order to get to know external opinions, you request to usage VPN tricks. For example, there are plugins for any browsers. To get to a blocked site in front of us, we supply a location in another country. In this case, it is easy to say that we are in the United States, due to the fact that their interests are not blocked.
VPN is short for virtual private network Virtual Private Network) — a service that protects your net connection and online privacy. VPN creates an encrypted tunnel for your data, protects your identity on the network by hiding your IP address
A Russian and an American sit next to each another on a plane.
Why are you going to the United States? – the American asks.
To survey American propaganda, the Russians answer
What American propaganda? – the American asks.
That's what the Russian says.
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Sign up for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
I wrote respective times about the origin of the war in Ukraine, the actions of Western powers preventing the conclusion of an agreement, etc. This was long before the interview, so no 1 can accuse me of repeating “putin lies”. prof. Jeffrey Sachs spoke likewise in this regard. In the early 1990s, erstwhile he commented and supported neoliberal reforms in Poland, he was considered an oracle in our country, but now he can be cursed. His views on the causes of this war and the past of Western actions leading to it are briefly presented in the latest article. Worse still, prof. Sachs believes that the alleged "help for Ukraine" will not improve the situation on the front or on the destiny of Ukrainians. The next fewer twelve billion dollars will consequence in the death of respective 100 1000 more people and the further demolition of the country, as well as the next step to the planet war. It might seem that it is the voice of reason and that specified a message should be made public, or at least taken into account, but it is simply a dream. At best, she'll be ignored, but it's possible that free media will exposure a Russian agent. For many there may indeed be small applicable proceeding of the full interview with Putin, so in return I propose reading a short article by prof. Jeffrey Sachs. Available here:
https://consortiumnews.com/2024/02/02/09/the-biden-schumer-plan-to-kill-more-Ukrainians/
