Nowack's task crushed. The Sejm showed all the mistakes of alleged wellness education

On Wednesday there was a joint gathering of parliamentary teams for the protection of the lives and wellness of Poles and for life and family. wellness education has been discussed. Experts in various fields have virtually crushed the education ministry project, pointing to its fundamental errors and large harm.

Experts pointed to serious problems with this subject. The elements of alleged sexual education contained in it will lead to lower levels of wellness of young Poles. This will consequence from early sexual stimulation and chronic stress in unprepared children. Dr. Dorota Jarczewska from the Institute of thought Pro-Life and Dr. Dorota Sienkiewicz from the Polish Association of Independent Doctors and Scientists talked about this.

In turn Dr Agnieszka Marianowicz-Szczygieł from the Foundation “She and He” spoke about the necessity to treat sexuality as part of human life, not as something isolated. She presented legal, formal, organisational, conceptual, methodological and methodical, substantive and ethical flaws proposed by the MEN.

Hanna Dobrowolska, coordinator of the School Protection Movement has overturned respective myths that are generated from the position of ministry officials and authors of the program base. She stressed that they had no rational basis, but only a propaganda function. They are to convince that opponents of wellness education are against the wellness of students. Dobrowolska compared the entries in the fresh programming basis with the programming bases of another subjects.

Dr. Zbigniew Barciński, president of the NATAN Pedagogy Association, compared the proposed fresh subject with “Bringing up for life in the family”. As the essence of the change between them, he pointed to the conversion of a voluntary subject showing sexuality in the context of the household to a forced, anti-family sexual education oriented towards pleasure.

Renata Krupa, an expert in the field of the planet wellness Organisation, has shown that all the content proposed in the fresh subject is present in ‘Rescue to life in the family’.

The legal aspects were presented by Mr Marek Puzio from the Ordo Iuris Institute, drawing attention to the provisions of the Polish Constitution and global legal acts. He pointed out the differences between science, education and education in the context of the proposed regulation.

In the last block of Magdalena Trojanowska from the Parents' Association, Children's Protection brought attention to the impact of sex education standards of the planet wellness Organisation and recommendations of the UN and the EU on the proposal of the basis of programme wellness education.

Agnieszka Pawlik-Regulska, president of the Association “Teachers for Freedom”, presented the ways and effects of permissive sex education in Western European countries (Germany, Austria, large Britain, France). She besides pointed out that the only WEDZ teacher invited to make the basis of wellness education, Antonina Kopyt, is an expert in sexed.pl sexual educators foundation, a foundation that cooperates with sex-shops and pharmaceutical companies producing birth control implants. Kopyt besides took a paid co-operation with Federa – the largest abortion lobby in Poland, which in its materials encourages masturbation, polyamoric sex and states that "porno in itself is not bad".

Pawlik-Regulska besides recalled the 2004 survey by Prof. Izdebski, in which he asked 14-17-year-olds what remuneration they received for the provision of sexual services and from what age should an adult be allowed to have intercourse with an underage person: from 10, 12 or 14 years old. Finally, she expressed hope that Poland would benefit from the experience of another countries and would not introduce permissive sexual education in order not to experience these crises which are facing Western countries.

Source: Coalition for the Salvation of the Polish School (KROPS)