Focused on 100 lies Tusk, thanks to which the coalition took power on 13 December we do not see another lie, present since 2018 in public space. Or even Brussels.
Nemissaries changed by all cases is simply a word that has permanently entered the fresh Politician. However, 1 of the main apolitical slogans like Tusk of the Iusitia Association is to expel and settle all those who allowed the Sejm to choose the members of the KRS from among the judges alternatively than the judges themselves. It's Adam Bodnar.
But what happens erstwhile a average citizen considers the above fairy tales to be actual and based on them begins to prosecute his allegedly violated rights through the incorrect Law and Justice?
This is the latest story, starting in January of this year.
Mr. X (name and surname known to the writer) lost the case. It's no large deal, due to the fact that there are dozens like him in Poland, possibly hundreds of thousands all year.
But what distinguishes Mr. X from the remainder is his uncompromising belief in the word coming from Brussels.
So erstwhile he received the judgement of the Court of Appeal in Katowice, he did not wonder. Following Tusk's voice, Bodnar's voice, and the Gersdorf Court, besides called upon him to resume proceedings.
After all...
President SSA Małgorzata Andrzejewska was submitted for appointment to the Court of Appeal in July 2020 (Resolution of the alleged neoKRS No. 522/2020). According to the ultimate Court resolution of 23.01.2020 (BSA I-4110-1/20) the incorrect cast of the court within the meaning of Article 439(1)(2) of the General Court or of the contrary to the composition of the court to the law within the meaning of Article 379(4) of the General Court and to certain another laws, where the failure of the process of appointment leads, in circumstantial circumstances, to a breach of the standard of independency and impartiality within the meaning of Article 45(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 6(1) of the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
There is no uncertainty that, in the light of the above resolution, the ruling of neo-Judges Małgorzata Andrzejewska is subject to a defect which causes its rulings to be, in fact, a non-existent act (sententia non existens) in the legal sense of the process.
In the above message I am reassured not only by the Association of Polish Judges Iustitia but besides by the last speeches of the Minister of Justice Dr Adam Bodnar.
ZThere could be only 1 answer to specified a dictum. A fresh date of the trial and flowers from the president of the Court along with apologies.
Who knows, possibly Mr. Bodnar's sending a card.
However, it turns out that X miscalculated.
His application was rejected. And this is by a justice who comes from a "correct" appointment, and the net shows her connections to Austria.
A Now be careful, dear reader. The judgment, or alternatively the ruling of the ultimate Court, which is referred to by justice Gabriel Pietrzyk-Cyrbus was issued by the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs of the ultimate Court.
Not only do all the judges that make it belong to the category of neojudges, but the TEU refused her right to call herself... a court!
- I'm sorry. Today, the fundamental judgement of the EU Court of Justice has been passed which considers that the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs of the ultimate Court is not an independent and impartial court within the meaning of Union law. This confirms the urgent request to reconstruct the regulation of law and legislative changes – stated on the X portal erstwhile RPO and now Minister of Justice and lawyer General Prof. Adam Bodnar commenting on the judgement of the TEU of 21 December 2023 (C-718).
I will admit that the course of yesterday's opposition, and present the ruling coalition on 13 December (also called the alliance of the trough) is making us increasingly into Marxist dialectics.
As the elders remember, it was briefly summarized by Lech Walesa - I'm in favour and even against!
The Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs of the ultimate Court is not a court But only if Bodnar says so or if he writes GazWyb or another specified a periodical.
However, if a citizen takes these statements seriously, it turns out that is the court and the neojudges are full judges.
And it's no good to question their status.
This is reserved for political usage only.
12.04 2024
Ps. The case is conducted under the signature III AUa 250/24.
