As reported by me(r)dia to SN on Tuesday, PKW's application concerning... the exclusion of all judges appointed allegedly not in accordance with the Constitution.
GMembers' moose (nomen omen) PKW denominations compromise 13 December he passed an application for exclusion from the judgement of the Law and Justices of all judges appointed for its consideration due to the fact that they were wrongly appointed, involving the alleged neo-KRS.
This proposal not only mentions by name all 7 judges appointed to hear a complaint against the decision of the PCW, but besides concerns another judges who have allegedly been wrongly appointed and may be appointed.
As of 2018, the “cactinationalists” associated with the current authority have been standing in the position that judges – members of the National Courts can only be elected by another judges, while representatives of the Nation, or sovereign, who nominally exercises authority in Poland (and so besides over the judiciary!) in accordance with Article 4 of the Constitution, can only look, due to the fact that they can in fact always be voted by the judiciary majority.
It's just that this argument is increasingly about... political competitions, at the highest level. I have already mentioned that attempts to reopen the case before an appeal court due to the fact that there were neojudges in the lineup failed at nothing.
It turns out that a akin treatment of a nuisance petent, who seemingly forgot that what was allowed by the voivode... is besides characterised by transnational bodies.
On the complaint made to European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, where literal quotes were utilized as an argument mundros Bodnar and his like, the answer came short.
The papers have been destroyed, and no 1 is going to talk about it.
Meanwhile, on the Court's side it stands like a bull:
But in the case of an action for disqualification after 13 December 2023, the consequence is different. Go to the basket with her!
Such proceedings show exceptional arbitrariness.
No, it's not.. Just as he prophetically observed more than 4 decades ago, Bareja:
We don't have your coat, and what are you gonna do to us?
The complaint was numbered 29844/24.
OIt is clear that the complainant is an exceptional fool.
Only that the complaint was filed by a reasonably good lawyer, and the argument was drawn from the current "authorities".
It appears, therefore, that the mention to the fact that the case was resolved by the “neosure” is just inconsistent and illegible gibberish.
PThe fact would should be agreed with Mrs. Bach.
The request for the exclusion of SN judges made by PKW should so be assessed.
But now ruling compromise 13 December takes the view that Article 4 of the Constitution is not mandatory and that the act of appointment by the president is only specified a local rite of folkloristic importance alternatively than legal significance.
Mgr Kalisz, expected elder brother Old Lubnauer, with a uncommon cavities about the non-recognition by most PKW members of the expected SN judgment. He is aware of the violation of the law he has committed. But the end justifies the means, which I believe is officially noted by a man named Lenin.
Because it's about the PiS not getting the money. And since Mr. Kalisz has been an lawyer for years, he knows perfectly well how to postpone court proceedings.
The request for exclusion is simply 1 of the elements to hold the process. due to the fact that it's truly about not having the money until the election.
And if Trzaskowski wins, is it PiS win the trial, it won't substance anymore. Compromise 13 December will enact the delegalisation of all “populist” parties, as the “Dupy” will sign, and leading PiS politicians will be accused of hatred speech and Islamophobia.
But what if Dr. Nawrocki wins?
4.12 2024
photo of the European Court of Human Rights
