The shortest definition of political sociology: a separate part of sociology explaining the phenomena of the conflict for power and power in institutionalized forms of social life. (more here:https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociology_politics)
And here are the results of my test, or possibly alternatively my in-law, who took the liberty of conducting a tiny group of readers, which fundamentally does not let for far-reaching generalizations resulting from specified observations. However, due to the fact that the test was conducted on 2 websites, on NEon24.net and on the WPS website (https://fiernipolsce1.wordpress.com) and gave very akin results, this allows to presume that the observed phenomenon is alternatively characteristic than peculiar.
The test afraid the reception of content contained in the text Choice of the right policy, and here are the results obtained on a much more widely read forum, on NEon24.net:
8 February 2017
number of views: 4009
3.71 (17) — [Assessment from 1 to 5 (number of evaluators)]
(https://wps-neon24-en.neon24.net/post/136885,election-appropriate-policy)
and receiving the same text After 8 years:
16 May 2025
number of views: 758
1.25 (4) — [Assessment from 1 to 5 (number of evaluators)]
(https://wps-neon24-en.neon24.net/post/181054,election-appropriate-policy)
And it is not about the author of the text, who could have been as smart or stupid in 2017 as in 2025, due to the fact that the text is the same, but about the recipients of the text, are they smarter today, in 2025 than they were 2017, or is it the opposite?
At least 2 proposals are possible:
1. national policy is moving in the right direction, which makes interest in this subject diminishes among readers, and the average reader is systematically showing increasing cognition and political awareness and rejects specified critical texts,
2. National policy disappoints more and more readers who lose interest in it – their number is decreasing, they are only increasingly indoctrinated by the political system, and thus negating critical texts.
And unfortunately, only 1 of these 2 conclusions is closer to the truth.
.
I am not a politician with ambition to make movement or party, so I do not gotta silence anything, pretend or do bow to anyone, with a view to the higher goal of building the apparent unity of a possible organization. It is incorrect to think that a conciliation method can build political movement and its strength. Unfortunately, a patchwork of different conflicting views, mentality, values, shortcomings in political cognition will not give political monolith. As an independent, nationalist, political publicist, I can afford to print content that does not gotta receive universal approval and I will not get complexes for it. For me it is more crucial to have nonsubjective fact and cognition that has always awakened and inactive sparked resentment or hostility, and that will never change, due to the fact that independent, nonsubjective criticism will always be against the politics of all real power, that political power and closely co-operating “spiritual” power.
Dariusz Kosiur
![Citizens of Colombia, the Philippines, India and Nepal are most likely to receive work permits in Poland [MRPiPS DATA]](https://dzienniknarodowy.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/praca_polacy_c_mondaynews_pl.jpg?v=1751625629)
