Everywhere The facts are obvious, and thus the ability to manipulate or cultivate propaganda is importantly limited, there is simply a space for experts and authorities. Since 2015, we have a real dump of specified specialists in Poland, whose diagnosis was never surprising, due to the fact that they always agreed with the political line, but logically and morally cried for vengeance to heaven. Constitutionalists were able to say that the Constitutional Court's ruling was final and irrefutable to undermine the Constitutional Tribunal's own words and judgments. What more bravados were able to preach specified absurdities, that if there is no evidence in the Constitution, then the “spirit” of the Constitution must be guided.
This spirit of the Constitution gave experts and authorities an incredible interpretation, besides specified that erstwhile the article of the Constitution clearly speaks of the law of grace, it was actually the "founding fathers" a pleasant thing in mind. And so to this day, serious professors are producing exponentially. On Monday, they claim that there is simply a presumption of the validity of the elections and so the resolution of the Extraordinary Chamber of Control and Public Affairs does not substance at all, and on Wednesday, this legal standard does not apply, as the election was won by the incorrect candidate. What's going on? The conviction of democracy should be rejected, the president should not be sworn in, the right changed by the signatures of the Marshal of the Sejm, the elections repeated and the right candidate elected “democratic party”.
The names of experts can be matched to all the cases described, and not just any. prof. Andrzej Zoll, Prof. Ewa Łętowska, Nestor and unquestionable legal authority Prof. Adam Strzembosz, sports car collector Prof. Marek Chmaj, whether the promising young man Prof. Marcin Matczak. Dr. Krzysztof Kontek was not in this pantheon of stars, mainly due to the fact that barely anyone has always heard of it. Even a Google searcher surrenders after entering your doctor's data without habilitation. So far Mr Kontek has been active in the statistic of music competitions, but since he took up the anomalies in election committees, he has rapidly advanced to outstanding authority in his field and has already visited all major media in Poland.
Little known was the expert who opened the door to fame, but his even little well-known methodology, which he speaks of, and it is very courageous. First of all, the music statistic he decided to examine only those anomalies that he felt were detrimental to Rafał Trzaskowski. On the question of Catherine Kolenda-Zalewska why he accepted specified a criterion, he replied that "as a scientist he has the right to do so." Another revealing component in the methodology of the Account is the acceptance that people surviving under the postal code themselves cast akin votes in elections. The doctor did not go into the details of this assumption, simply “as a scientist he had the right to do so.” In another doubt, TVN journalist, which should be stressed, you have made music statistic astound not only a writer but besides viewers of TVN, which is besides worth highlighting.
When Catherine Kolenda-Zaleska, she besides rightly pointed out that the increased support for Karol Nawrocki between the first and second rounds could be due to the flows of electorate and increased attendance, the expert burned something like this: “I was not curious in it at all, I did not consider it in the study, I was just examining the anomaly.” With specified methodology and authority Karol Nawrocki had no chance and had to lose to Rafał Trzaskowski. Does this mean a fresh phase in Dr's career without Krzysztof Kontek's habilitation? This most likely would have happened due to the fact that the “scientist” has served the “democratic side”, but unfortunately there is an net and there is already a human-me.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
