The liberal-left elite in Europe, frequently under the name of the erstwhile chade, is powerfully "defenced for democracy". This defence is not that it convinces itself to its rations (more and more frail) and wins the election.
This “defence” consists of administrative pressures, intimidation, exclusion, censorship, threats of illegalisation or direct exclusion from elections. The victim is the alleged utmost right, as the ruling Europe is defined by the clicks of all parties who do not accept the direction in which Europe is headed with the highly ideological and bureaucratic European Union.
Without a doubt, Germany is at the forefront of the policy of authoritative European murderism, governed by politicians who have not long represented their voters, but by globalist think tankes, the Georg Soros Empire or BlackRock. It is these people who are terrified of the increase in support of AfD, which is the fruit of their crazy climate, immigration and abroad policies – as the only antidote to this phenomenon sees not in the correction of their own program, but in the progressive murderism. The Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) in its latest study points to the increasing threat posed by ‘extremistic trends inside AfD’. This party, according to analysis, acts in a way that undermines the foundations of the democratic strategy in Germany. The study is classified, only it is known that according to him, “The dominant in the organization [that is, in AfD] ethnic-origin knowing of the nation is not in line with the free democratic basic order. For example, AfD considers that German citizens with a migrant background from Muslim countries are not equal members of the German people according to the cultural definition advocated by the party." Ridiculous? Of course. Everyone in Germany knows precisely that the vast majority of immigrants, even those with German citizenship, do not identify with Germany, their culture and history. On the first better occasion, specified as the football match or the visit of the Turkish president to Germany, it emerges. But stating the fact is for BfV "a threat to democratic order"!
In the background, of course, there is an obsessive fear by the "rebirth of Nazism", which should be eradicated in the embryo, but this is only a pretext to justify the continuation of the current arrangement in power, utilizing all available methods. This, among another things, makes parties seemingly completely distant from each other, from the far left to the like-right (CDU) – they hold together to the bottom, mocking millions of voters they cheat at all turn. Fighting the shadows of Hitler's establishment begins to scope for his methods from the first period of rule. Subsequent German governments in the name of "democracy" and "fight against climate warming" destruct their own car industry, destruct energy and social tissue. But it is not these governments that are "extreme", it is the opposition that demands correction and change. We have the same thing. What is the difference between the curiosity and scandalous study of the committee on Belarusian and Russian influences and the German BfV report?
Jan Engelgard
Think Poland, No. 19-20 (11-18.05.201025)
