Humans have lived on Earth for little than 200 000 years. any scientists believe that nancials have been nancial since 400 000. Irrespective of this, erstwhile we were born, these 200 000 years are certain, which is where we have already existed. It is besides actual that another homities have died less. The five-year-old candidature of 200 000 years ago, a associate of the Flores of 50 000, and a neandertal and denouncingly more than 40 000 years ago.
Thus, our genres co-existed with others and became the most legitimate. The purest species are the backs of blacks from central Africa — they are patterns of homing without domes, and towns with another homings are whites from Europa and yellows from Asia. Aboriginals, before they got to Australia, may have had a bit of a cross with someone.
How can this be done from the extremes? Is it essential for these another homities to service human primaries, or should they be treated like a beast?
There is only 1 criterion: if we cross it, then there is no another way to give them precisely the taki same prawa specified as a gazunek homo sapiens. due to the fact that children should have specified a lair as a father and mother, and father and parent as a child. There is no alternative. And if we weren't crossing, then the genres would be as acquainted as they were, but they could be with the jacs that are peculiar to dogs, cats or horses, for example.
There is no request to deduce the environment, it is possible to have a common seed alternatively than an innovation, whether or not it is related to its appearance or behaviour. For this reason, abortion is simply a death, due to the fact that it deduces biology, alternatively than the physicofififificial concepts.
Although present we would have added another homicides with which we were cross-crying, human prawe, this was not the case in the past. The Pitecanthropist or the Flores man may have died out without the participation of the man, but we have surely been wiped out.
This is due to the fact that until little than 20 1000 years ago, people were mostly instinctive and lived in tiny stocks, up to 150 individuals. We've had our share. We were hunters, so we besides wiped out most of the large mammals. A associate is simply a fine, armed, agretive, infantyl, prone to bio-violent rapes, a small-murderer with strong terriritional instincts. This fresh task started to start with the emergence of a higher culture and agriculture. In this way, we have created a top-notch property, and in peculiar a domain. We began to make a culture that contradicts our nature. 1 culture of nature did not immediately replace, in general it did not replace. Continuing culture with a natural waltz.
Libertarianism, as well as the sixth liberalism and the thought of freedom, is the essence of culture, not nature, it is simply a creative concept. erstwhile the civilizations were not, neither was the prairie and the equality of its origin, we were not in that direction, we were powerfully dependent on the stad and its hierarchy. any individuals stood above others – they had more rights to fight strong and sophisticated. It was over-mordy, not liberism. The noble wilderness is an unscientific myth. And erstwhile the work began to form, erstwhile the anticipation began to be suffixed, then inactive the mortal nature of the art has become dominant and is happening to this day. Hence the blood of war. A associate of the nature is not good in the possible meaning of the word. This is simply a large deal of culture, due to the fact that it is the first to definite.
To complete the creative work, we must completely destruct the war. In this objective, we request to make the thought of freedom, we request to go to the front of the most fresh ideas, culminating in culture, which is inactive lybertarianism with the most crucial non-agreement. This cult will talk about the fact that the impotent initialization of the assets. These assets are natural, and they are consistent with the request for another branches of hominities. Only this thought was not pacific. It is not preferred to initiate the force, but it is more likely to interfere. For this reason, I have symbolized the libertarianism of a heater that does not even attach, but if you step on it, it can kill you with venom.
Wars are to be eliminated, which does not mean that we can completely destruct force from our lives. The wars have eliminated not for the sake that we can improve ourselves, but for the sake that they halt paying. Civilization will make through the improvement of technology, and this improvement will consequence in a steady increase in applicable efficiency. This increase in interpretations. In the end, we will accomplish that the eco-musical handbook will play its function over our most lethal instincts. We're going to do something little than bargain it.
The war is about effort and cost. erstwhile this is what the war gives, we will do more and little through voluntary co-operation, then the war will disappear. due to the fact that the countries will vanish and their immensity will consequence in a natural terrosis. There will be tiny back fights with psychopaths, sociopaths and another perverts. In this way, if we can build or re-create the neanderthal, we will not take it out again, we will live in peace with it. In addition, we are the most crucial part of the culture that has taught libertarianism with its 2 possible acquaints – the smudges and nonagreements. It is crucial to learn and make them, due to the fact that these authorities are non-tural.
Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
My social media:
]]>Twitter]]>]]>.com/gps65]]>
]]>gps65.]]>Living room24]]>.pl]]>
]]>Facebook]]>]]>.com/gie.pe.es.65]]>
]]>t.me/]]>]]>KanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>YouTube]]>]]>.com/@GrzegorzSwiderski]]>
Invalid.pl/people/gps65
PS. Related notes:
