Finally! This election will not change anything for the better, and that is not why it is important, due to the fact that choosing a modest part of the country will have a crucial and affirmative impact on the country's destiny and the welfare of its people. The only thing we don't know is which of the main candidates will be worse and more harmful to the ruling coalition. Everyone will contribute to the collapse of the current government in the forthcoming parliamentary elections, but that is not what gives emergence to a ray of hope for the future.
The effects of the full government indolence shown from October 15, 2023, whose possible is focused on witch hunting and the appearance of reform, will be even more lamented erstwhile the strategy is closed. There are indications that they can be truly dangerous. Otherwise, we will have a permanent lamentation that the president does not let us to sanitize and improvement – a salvific alibi for the impossibility and inability of serving Poland and avoiding work for abroad service. There's no telling which script will be more tragic. Hope comes from the fact that there is an end to duopol due to a clear increase in people's awareness that the state of the main political forces is based on showing that the competitor is stealing, and that is not nice. It's only incorrect if our Kali doesn't bargain the cow. The choice of the preferred robbery pack has so far shaped worldviewal, axiological, hegemon selection and political preferences articulated on both sides without being embarrassed by sophisticated star symbolism, but decided that it is not as crucial as we support, crucial to whom and to what we cannot accept. This time, after many years of mistakes and distortions, most possible voters said: no possumusOh, my God! for specified dictum.
The crowding of people by the decent media generated the belief that Poland is divided into 2 unequal halves, namely Jasnagród and Ciemnograd. Numbers similar, but uneven, due to the fact that the first presented usually as much larger and clearly more important. Always in the election the most many group were voters who did not respond to any of the draft proposals. The views of the silent majority are unknown. Unwritten collusion suggests to the public that it is an asocial element, not curious in the welfare of Poland and its citizens. That's a lie. Even 31,000 homeless people in Poland are curious in making their countrymen rich, arrogant and happy, due to the fact that it is besides a good possible for those in request of help. For the safety of the system, no 1 asks why the majority of society doesn't choose 1 of the robbery packs. The answer could be any cognitive discomfort for power strugglers as well as supporters: apart from cases of social pathology of the silent majority simply does not correspond to any offer on the political market. They do not see moral justification for supporting forces that do not convince that they know, can and can realize justice, goodness and beauty with the benefit of the state and citizens. This is not speculation but a conclusion from the many years of experience on the surviving body of those wisers who do not succumb to hypocrites arguing about choosing little evil and deficiency of patriotism. Among those honest, deceived, with the hope of voting within the system, voters, 21% (4.2 million) told the duo for the first time – no! Supporting the black gap of the core of darkness: anti-Ukrainians, anti-Semites, Putinian onuces, misogynists, racist fascists and possibly cannibals. abruptly it turned out that not specified an anti-Ukrainian fascist-anti-semite terrible as were painted by both pack robberies! You can even sign a joint pact and go for a beer! The first circular of the election was voted by 6.1 million voters, by Karol Nawrocki 5.8 million. no of them supported14 million voters, not counting 3.5 million votes cast on 9 another candidates. This makes a difference on the political stage: 21% of Mentzna and Braun voters plus 33% of non-voters gives 54% of the eligible, non-politically curious in the offer of alternating political forces. A dawn of changes that we are completely unprepared for.
Why don't 10 million voters, a 3rd of the eligible, take part in the election? As I mentioned: we do not know the answer, but the working hypothesis is very likely: they did not get the expected offer, or they were not convinced of the proposed one, and they are convinced that the choices do not make sense and meaning. It's not the voters' fault. This is the consequence of a hard-boiled political state, for apologizing to honest citizens, the establishment. The general voters of all options complain: this is not precisely my candidate, but I like it to others. Why don't we have challengers who meet expectations more than just that they're little inferior than others? This is simply a typical problem like a ellipse square: the main political forces do not offer honest authorities anything to encourage them to engage in political activity pro publico bono. Respecting prominent compatriots do not see themselves as supporting accessible political structures, compromising without a shadow of embarrassment, uncritical and openly impunityless. On the another hand, the main political forces are not curious in gaining honest authority, as they are just an additional obstacle in the strategy to accomplish the priorities. The state of consciousness that politics under the pretext of civic service is primarily about changing competition in access to impunity-free unpaid benefits is measured by voting numbers. It shouldn't be specified a surprise. The experimentation lasted long enough. Significantly, no of the presidential candidates had a program staff, only election staffs analyzing the preferences of possible voters. The main contenders have simply presented the views of the forces to which they are affiliated, and these are primarily pursuing the stated goal, increasingly transparent to the increasing number of citizens.
Policy changes are not keeping pace with the increase in people's awareness. Poland is against the wall no substance who becomes president. Like the Prime Minister and abroad Minister with his wife, Rafał Trzaskowski, as Polish Kamala Harris, is not expected in the White House. In combination with ostentatious rusophobia, this makes Poland the subject of global relations of major quarterbacks. The counting of European allies must take account of historical experience. Unlike the government, voters rightly did not forget them. Karol Nawrocki meets the expectations of the current hegemon, especially since he will without hesitation sacrifice the well-being of citizens by making an obvious, expected sacrifice for supporting and pursuing common political objectives. There is no rose without spikes and the eventual president Nawrocki will be an unnecessary ballast for hegemon's plans of normalization and cooperation with the fresh strategical enemy. For business purposes president Trump will establish a limited affair with the despised Tusk-Trzaskowski, alternatively than Putin with Karol, Hammer on graves and memorials of the holy heroes of Russia, liberating Poland from the German barbary, which is reportedly being pursued by a BOLO. The measurement of irresponsibility of the establishment exceeded the critical value expressed by election results. Even the massive expansion of the sovereign, which seems to be increasingly hoping in anti-system confederations, has not helped. The phenomenon may be exacerbated due to the activation of a silent majority, any of which have the chance to find themselves in a fresh political reality.
The real elite is besides awakening, alternatively occupied with critical vulnerability of errors and distortions of power. I mean the few, unrelated to any party. These are among the people of science, unlike the media almost entirely stubborn. The outline of the minimum affirmative programme for all Polish government, who would like to break out of the methods of operation and priorities of the duople, was presented by prof. Stanisław Bielen (Think Poland, 11-18 May 2025):
"To scope out to intellectual resources in the country and among Poles surviving abroad will not only strengthen the authority of power. It will besides aid the public to believe that, in keeping with Polish interests, the head of state wants to defend and implement these interests. In order to reflect respect for pluralism and different views, various collective bodies of an advisory and opinion nature should invitation persons outside the acolytes circle, frequently critical and polemic towards authoritative positions. Only then will the president meet social expectations as the most crucial political arbiter. The president must usage all possible sources of cognition and inspiration. no of the candidates for this honorary function are omnipotent. Indeed, this "monocratic" institution is required to have reliable prescriptions for solving complex problems, but President's wisdom should be the consequence of collective wisdom, cooperation with many professional communities. He should besides go along with humility and modesty, without imposing himself with his assurance or even his shoe." The same, only more so, applies to those in power.
The election run does not even make the illusion that the current main political forces and candidates for advanced office are capable and can consider the implementation of the obvious, due to the fact that necessary, proposals of prof. Bielenia in both interior and abroad politics. We have parliamentary elections in 2 years, and only a miracle could origin a extremist change beyond the probable next shift of power. The duopol's tenure amounted to highly different confederations, which in terms of tactics do not disagree from the main quarterbacks. They never had and do not have in the program the application of prof. Bielenia's proposal. They are calmly waiting for further governments to compromise themselves enough. specified a safe and beautiful certain program, for now. possibly politicians like Ewa Zajączkowska, my favorite, are able to go beyond this comfortable opportunism and hire software teams to work on answers to key questions. How can state spending be reduced so that taxes can be reduced? Consider the meaning and effects of climateism, the emigration pact, the LGBT madness? Specify the opportunities and ways to rebuild relations with neighbours? Rational, not neocolonial cooperation with hegemon? If the future president with the government actually believes that the inalienable right of women to have their bodies is to inject potassium salt into the heart of an unborn child, then possibly it is worth considering the public opinion in a referendum. But not asking if a female has the right to have her body, but are you for killing unborn children with an injection into the heart? The government cannot effort to empathize people with stories about deregulation, or regulations that have long been in force, but are not in use. It is essential to analyse how much a return to the Wolf Act, a minimum of effective deregulation, is possible under EU law. There is simply a request for discussion on improvement of justice, police, customs, wellness services, etc. all another way is simply a canal.
An impotent government placed against the wall of crying can be erratic (for what is only insane) erstwhile it yet realizes that under the gates there is simply a truly disastrous, not comic end. In the coalition, there is simply a confusion after fresh reports from the excesses of the fire in the brothel performed by the leader: “The platform is so pathetic that it convinced me to vote to disgust Nawrocki.” Fatherland without madness, come back to us, Lord!
Eugeniusz Mochidłowski
