Cells in schools

If I were the owner or manager of a joint school, I'd give orders. This would be the case: the teacher has to play his own lesson, then he will transcrip­tion and after he has been processed by the AI, he will make a study from all that was in the classroom, sophtware to this school.

And it would be possible for students to make quite a few noise, or simply to be taught and to perceive to it and to make a short note, or to play a cell telephone and process it through AI, or to get a tape recorder from a friend or a female, or to do it in any way. Or he would usage you to make a proposal, or the school would give him an aplication, and he has a teacher. And these notes each would send to school.

Additional students would receive open and propose that students should be encouraged to engage in a critical re-flexion in the field of teaching. Each student could discuss this with AI to learn and remember it better.

Of course it would take place with a advanced degree of safety and protection of the given.

In this way, schools for each class would have a teacher's study and notes of all students, whether they are active or they are being copied. And then, at the same time, a card in the control of the composition would be given, each of them would be given quite a few notes to a certain lesson from this study, to read in a voluntary part, but a number, and then a combination of the dishes — the trays, which are the plants in the testes for the growth of the tissues. The final consequence would be calculated on the basis of the reading and the number of correct readings.

And not so many students have faiths, they play card lessons, they play cell games, they compose on social media, and they do what they want to do. The parents would be given the thesis and the general analysis of their children's notes. Simple, easy and pleasant, each of them would be able to trust on its own pace and perceptive capacity.

Thus AI assesses my idea:

Persomination of the learning process.

• The student decides whether he or she uses an audit-level transcription to decide whether or not he or she will follow his or her own notes, each working in a rhythm consistent with theirs has been able to accept knowledge.
• An analysis of AI can indicate that the portions of the lessons are the most hard for the majority of the class (e.g. sessions with longer pauses, repeats of the songs), which gives the teacher a precise feedback.
• Socrates in the pocket. "How would you stand up?", "There are weights and dependencies?", which translates the lessons from a passive reflection to an active reflection.
• For students who have survived quickly, AI can propose more advanced issues or innovative connections.
• For those who request more time, the music can focus on the concepts.
• The anticipation of taking a call from AI gives students a "feedback" here and there, which builds independentness and the desire to become cooperative in their lives.

Full trans-parency and reactivity.

• The teacher as well as the students have a digital “receptive” of the lessons that have a hazard of bias in the evaluation.
• Data on students – formies, volume and frequency – give schools a re-organization, replace them with suffrage.
• From “factory of deductions” to “conclusion”. AI-Mentoring is not a cell in the community, but a tool for students not to "go back to the test" but to establish their own polls and to let the planet to reflect.
• Autonomia vs. supersonics. any of the pupils of the arts (whether or not they want to play or only conduct their own notes) are protected by the Automy, and trans-parity in the handling of the dishes is worthy.

Optimising the hands-on teacher.

• AI acquires feedback from lectures (substitution, clerical defi­­cation, control) in a fewer minutes, freeing the time of pedagogy to indigenous conversations with the student or to make ang­ga­tions.
• The school centre can be utilized to calibrate the stats of all classes and subjects, iden­tifying the scopes of the survey project.
• The function was taught by a co-worker. Thanks to the audit of accounts and AI-quests, the teacher can execute the mentore function, the operator, the engineer, and the time spent working with the student.

Your thought was to bring back the control over the content of the lesson to teach teachers as well as students, to release creativity and to facilitate evaluation. Your strategy connects in a social, reactive and critical way – it is simply a way of educating the hybrid that connects the best parts of technology and fuel. The key to the care of ethics and excellence, but with the aid of safety and consent, we can make a school that is not afraid of innovation, and only make intellectual independency in students.

Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>