Mentzen's household Foundation

In a fresh government of the tv Republika, there was a link between Swovomir Mentzen and Shimon Holovnia, which I had forwarded. And then I'm going to make a mercenary message on this:

SCHIMON HUNGARY: I have a phylum here, I'll play it. Does he know this philist? I can tell you what's going on. That's what you've been bragging about, how you've made a Polish country at the start of 3 million gold. Transfers of the company Mentzen S.A. to the household function and sale through these foundations to avoid payment of 2.8 million Polish taxes. Mr. Milioner does not want to pay Polish taxpayers. Aren't you ashamed of that? You choose to make Poland without any subsidies, due to the fact that you have ...

Famous Ment-zen: You have proof that the Marshal of the Sejm does not know how to function in Poland. It provides for household functions to be adopted in the preceding parliamentary term. It was supported by all of them: PiS, Plat­for­ma, the left-wing veto has supported this provision... due to the fact that it is only a simple provision that functions in the large parts of the European Union. It is not actual that I am switching off the taxing jaquel. household functions service the re-investment of products and do not pay the tax. But if I want to pay money from this foundation, I pay from this local donation. I've already paid out of this money function and I've paid out of all cash payment in the world.

SCHIMON HUNGARY: Is that all you sold?

Famous Ment-zen: Yeah. How much money I have spent on these investments I have paid for my surviving property, I have paid noreally since that payment in accordance with the original. And I am very sorry that you do not feel like a good intrusive for re-investment, for the growth of the Polish community there are household functions. It is only a request that the Poles do not realize how it works, on which it re-engineered...

SCHIMON HUNGARY: The fact is that household functions were designed to defend children in Polish household companies. That's due to the fact that we didn't think that the tweezers like you were going to be utilizing these mechanics to do this, so that we wouldn't pay the taxes on our shares from our companies. Do you want to be a typical of Poland? You're going to proceed to sale your shares through the Foundation, so that you don't pay taxes?

Famous Ment-zen: This allegation is besides devoting to me as if you had asked me to benefit from a church free of charge.

SCHIMON HUNGARY: To what did they rise these roads as not from the subsidies that you went to the studio today? You're a savory love that's taxed.

Famous Ment-zen: I pay higher taxes than you, as well as in the...

The following is the evaluation meritorium:

The dispute is dealt with in a single retouratory shot ("mother-or-millionaire" vs. "you don't have a gospodarka"), but the merium is simply a dilemma or a household function is simply a legitimate incentive to invest, or an excessive relief for the gods.

What is it and how does it truly work?

The household function (Law of 26 and 2023) is intended to enable the transfer of children without taking part, erstwhile they are released from CIT as long as they are carrying out the assets in the middle. erstwhile paying the funds or the funds, 15% of the full CIT, the closest PIT household may be 0%, 10 – 15%.

What did Ment­zen do?

He then sold them inside the foundation and did not pay the taxation on disposal in this capacity. If he had paid the cash, the foundation would gotta run 15% of CIT, and he would not have paid PIT. That is simply a contribution of little than 19% + 4% of the contribution of the social network, which would lead to physical surviving without delay. It is legal and honest.

The Parliament (from left to right) wanted to attract capital and prevent companies from moving to Liechtenstein or Malta — hence generous liberations. It does not introduce any qualifiers or “investigative” tests, which can be utilized to postpone or reduce donations.

How do you explain this to the average voter?

Imagine that you have a complaint. As long as the money lies in the parliament, the office of the complainant is in charge. erstwhile you take out the banks and put them in the portfell, you will take 15 gr from each gold. If you never open a parliament, it's not going to save them.

Ment­zen sold shares in the centre of the district. Now it has frozen love that can be re-invested without a tax. If you (and if you) take your money out of it, you will pay 15%. You say: “You are utilizing Polish roads today, pay today”. Mentzen says: “The work has allowed me to pay erstwhile I truly usage something of this stuff on me, and in the mediate of the day Polish companies grow.”

Sequence:

➡️ Pragmatic: it provides a strong incentive to build capital in the Cy­per region.
Policy: for a part of the opinion of the public, this looks like favors to the gods, due to the fact that the phase pays 12-32% of the PIT in the month, and the millionaire can pay 0% by summer, and then 15%.
➡️ Economies: Although you will be able to pay the taxation at the beginning, if the cost of the capital is 0%, it will give you a real life, due to the fact that that means that money can be utilized or at least it is not financed. This is simply a cluster of investment relief, but without the work to invest for a circumstantial purpose.
➡️ Etyka: the sound is not “or legal?” but “or quick?”. Here, the elector needs to measure for himself, which Narracje is closer to their intuitions: the voluntary marketplace or the society.

After a simple Mentzen, it is simply a voluntary market, a capital, and it is simply a community-led community, a community-based society. Mentzen is an environmental expert, knows about the go-to and profoundly distributed taxation systems, and Hoarding is an ignorance, does not claim to be a guest, and I do not know about the impertinence and learning ability of non-disciplinaries. Mentzen is simply a savvy, meritorical technocrat, and Hołownia is simply a huma­tive motivator.

The key to the decision of the electorate is not over the CIT-PIT table, but over time and who is to carry out state maintenance: “in the capacity to improve” or “precisely erstwhile released on its own”. And more simply: do you have socialism or capitalism? If you have the presence of a socialism, a genre, a physics and a re-distribution, you will have the presence of the Prussian, Holovnia, Nawrockie, Biejat or Zand­berga, and you will have the luxury of Ku­ba, Venezuela, or Half-Night Kore in Poland, and if you would have the freedom of capital in Poland, you will have Singa­pur, Switzerland or Liechtenste.

Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>