M. Skalski: How Bosaczysko stuck to JKM erstwhile it paid off

“Mr. Janusz talks nonsense”, “Mr. Janusz talks complete nonsense” – Bosaczysko late announced in his tour after the biggest media. The Bosaczysko felt like a fish in the water, but both he and the host media agree on at least 1 key issue – from Corwin 1 must cut off, condemn him and retire.

As an perfect centrist, Bosaczysko changed her opinion about JKM's cooperation and presence in politics depending on current circumstances. Of course, late Bosaczysko did not mention to meritum Corwin's statements, without indicating what is in peculiar false or outrageous. However, no 1 in the host media required this from Bosaczysk, so there was no request to investigate.

Meanwhile, in January 2022 Bosaczysko argued that "Parliamentary policy is based on cooperation and compromises". The title hero besides defended Confederate unity against inserting the wedge from the ‘ideal purity’ position. It is characteristic, however, that in the acquainted kind Bosaczysko did not mention to clou the argument of the actual surrender (still believed to be inactive existing) of the organization of the National Liberal Movement in the Confederacy. As we can see, Bosaczysko, in the name of the unity of the Confederate, was ready to sacrifice the perfect principles, which can now be reproved by the malicious, not being the electorate of the centre. Therefore, Bosaczysko does not care about specified voices at all.

However, Bosaczysk must be acknowledged that in his actions he is consistently flexible. The following entry, which the author resented in 2016, gained the approval of Bosaczysk himself.

Bosaczysko gave the entry further without additional comment, which, outside the centre electorate, can interpret as signing both hands on ritual outrage against Corwin. Traditionally no mention to meritum Cases: Bosaczysko does not descend to this level, with the highlands judging everything as elegantiarum arbiter.

Once “for” and erstwhile “against” – Bosaczysko is simply a master of camouflage, acrobatics and situational logic in one. Bad, insensitive and besides extremist observers will say that this is simply a "assertive approach to their own beliefs". Those even worse and even more radical, any of which may even support JKM, will say that we are dealing with individual with unstable views. On the another hand, the average individual will measure that Bosaczysko is simply a careerist who does not attach any importance to views at all – at least not as large as his own hairstyle or subsequent invitations to mainstream media, where 1 can cut off from Corwin.

Read also:

M. Skalski: Mr. Janusz's biggest mistake