There's so many champagne cork steps fired in the Kremlin that you haven't seen from a given man! The bifurcated ripost of politicians, mainly those in power, is always an expression of powerlessness or an effort to camouflage various failures, inability or violation of the law. After the president vetoed the SEFE bill, which was communicated in yesterday's message, The avalanche was fired by “crumpets of champagne in the Kremlin” and the full inventory package combined with black visions. This was the reaction to be expected, and the ruling coalition was prepared for specified a campaign, rather adequate to say that the first spots condemning the president, appeared 6 minutes after the message, meaning they were removed from the shelf, due to the fact that in specified a short time even a one-minute video cannot be assembled.
If it is known that the government has launched a ritual repost, it is worth considering what it wants to hide and how to violate the law. Let us go back for a minute to Donald Trump's controversial proposal, which was the Council of Peace. The first message from Prime Minister Tusk was: “The accession of Poland to an global organization requires the approval of the Council of Ministers and ratification by the Sejm”. Exceptionally Donald Tusk told the fact and the same rule applies not only to global organisations, but besides to global agreements. SAFE is not just a debt that any citizen can take in a commercial bank, although yet it is specified banks that will fund SAFE. SAFE is nothing but an global agreement and this means that the government must respect the following article of the Constitution:
Article 89. [Ratification of global agreements]
1. Ratification and termination of an global agreement by the Republic of Poland shall require prior approval in the Act, if the agreement concerns:
...
4) a crucial financial burden on the State.
The full of Poland has heard many times that we are to "get" from the European Union immense money for reinforcement of the Polish army, but that is not true. Poland is to draw a gigantic debt for PLN 185 billion and the second will gotta pay in interest. There can so be no uncertainty that we are dealing with an global agreement that is "significantly chargeable to the state financially". Consequently, the ratification of specified an agreement requires a law, and this 1 has been vetoed by president Karol Nawrocki. In accordance with the law and constitution, it is not possible to join the EU SAFE programme in a non-legal mode. The government's proposal to vote on the resolution clearly breaks the constitution and although breaking the constitution is as popular an argument as shooting champagne corks in the Kremlin, there is simply a crucial difference.
In the case of the Government Act, work is divided into: government, Sejm, Senate, president of the Republic of Poland, and the signatory of the global agreement is simply the Republic of Poland, as the Minister of abroad Affairs confirms. The resolution procedure theoretically makes the majority of the parliament responsible, but at the end individual will besides gotta sign this agreement in violation of the Constitution. At this point, the question is, who's going to sit? Many point out that Magdalena Sobkowiak-Czarnecka, a typical of the government for the instrument to enhance Europe's security, will be inserted into this mine. This seems unlikely, however, due to the fact that Magdalena Sobkowiak-Czarnecka is simply a Undersecretary of State and signing an global agreement by an authoritative of specified low rank would be a complete curiosium. If the agreement does not agree to sign Radosław Sikorski, the Prime Minister may give power of lawyer to another minister and this indicates 2 most likely candidates: Head of MON Władysław Kosiniak-Kamish and Finance Minister Andrzej Domański. Donald Tusk surely cannot be drawn into this affair, so he will gotta look for a scapegoat.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
