Anna Brylka during the Debate of the European Parliament candidate on Channel Zero.
– I am pleased to open the list of Confederations in Wielkopolska. I encourage our viewers to analyse my activity in fresh years. I criticised the European Green Deal before it became fashionable, scoring specifically its elements. And I was right about time.
I would like to work in the European Parliament in the Committee on Agriculture, in the Committee on Trade, but above all I would like to be specified an early informing strategy in the Polish public debate. What has been lacking in fresh years, erstwhile many solutions were adopted at European Parliament level, where certain solutions could be signalled here in Poland earlier. This was not the case and this early informing strategy is needed. My election slogan: “First Poland!” and it is the interests of Poland and Poles in the European Parliament that I want to represent.
I am against the abolition of veto law and the most crucial thing in this area is that this right of veto is to be abolished in the area of abroad and safety policy and in financial affairs policies, i.e. matters concerning fresh own resources. This is precisely Amendment 248, so that no 1 here blames me for making a mistake. This procedure has begun in accordance with Article 48 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. There are many changes here, there is simply a shift from many competences divided into exclusive competences in Brussels!
The point is that we have a division in the treaties, that there are exclusive competences of the European Union, that there are shared competences and that there are own competences of the associate State. The Treaty proposal says that, for example, climate issues are to become the exclusive competence of the European Union.
It is no coincidence that there have been so many amendments to these Treaty changes. I mean, they will most of them be lost, but they will be 10, 15, 20, 30 of the most crucial ones that are going to lead to a shift towards the centralisation of the European Union. At European Union level, there is simply a decision that enlargement of the European Union will be linked to the revision of the Treaties! And this is precisely what Macron said, Scholz, but besides Minister of Sikorski.
Russian influence should not be at all the subject of polling spots. Russian influences should be the subject of Polish counterintelligence, services and so on. It's very easy to call individual Russian stooge, Russian stooge, Russian stooge, no substance what we say. This polarization between the PiS and the Platform simply serves an election campaign, due to the fact that it pushes out smaller political environments, specified as the Confederation. And the political debate, Pre-election debate before the European Parliament elections should address real problems and proposals for solutions by political parties: whether towards the European Green Deal, or towards trade relations with Ukraine, or the increase in energy prices, the increase in the cost of surviving resulting from Poland's presence in the European Union.
Polish MEPs should represent the Polish interest! This is why they are chosen by the Polish people. This is why the Polish people are sending representatives to the European Parliament to prosecute their interests, so Mrs Róża Thun's message is simply outrageous. And what's more, ma'am Rose Thun voted against Poland in the European Parliament! She voted in favour of the Building Directive, voted in favour of the Pact on Migration and Asylum, voted in favour of the ban on combustion cars, advocates the abolition of veto law and supports the introduction of the euro! So this is simply a vote against Poland.
There would be no Building Directive if there were no European Green Deal if there were no Fit for 55, which was agreed by Prime Minister Morawiecki, who extended the climate policy to the construction industry, which already, by its very premise, introduces zero-emission construction by 2050. These provisions of the Building Directive will be very costly! I have no uncertainty about that at all.
The changes that are included there, zero-emission public buildings – 2028, zero-emission private buildings – 2030, the withdrawal of fossil fuels from 2040, mandatory photovoltaics, building passports, a wave of renovations of buildings, energy efficiency class, all this is in this directive and all this will should be implemented. This directive was accepted at the Council of the European Union, unfortunately without opposition from Poland! So we have a continuation of this policy.
