For respective years now, we have been witnessing highly worrying events in Europe and in the mediate East, which have late gained alarming momentum.
W Europe is peculiarly worrying about the rapidly increasing immense escalation of the replacement war NATO is conducting with Russia in Ukraine. besides in the mediate East, we see a sharp emergence in tension, resulting in an expanding American-Iran war, which is sucking more and more countries.
As Poles who occupy the area in the centre of Europe, we should receive the NATO-Russian escalation as a real nightmare. erstwhile we perceive to the statements of leading Western politicians, it turns out that everyone loves war, and only a fewer are curious in peace. Even diplomats – and this is frightening – alternatively of working hard to halt this madness of death beyond our east border, seem to only add fuel to the fire. The head of EU diplomacy is an academic example of this attitude in the European backyard Kaja Kallas, and with us besides a pathetic singularity in the individual of the Minister of abroad Affairs of Poland, Radosław Sikorski.
It's not better behind the ocean. In 2025, erstwhile political and media mainstream all over The West was fearfully shouting that Donald Trump was getting along with Vladimir PutinThings were completely different. In fact, Trump, working closely with the CIA and Palantir Corporation, prepared a powerful escalation of the conflict with the Russian Federation in the form of the last respective months of the drone war. In the background of visits Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner (Flip and Flap of U.S. Military commercials) in Moscow, Washington planned large-scale attacks on targets and critical infrastructure located in deep Russia. A dark prelude to the ongoing drone war was carried out on the night of 28 to 29 December 2025 an attack on the residence of the Russian Federation president in Waldaj. In another words, despite the declaration that the war could be concluded by 1 telephone call, and even after last year's summit in Anchorage, in fact Donald Trump did not for a minute quit his strategy of subjugating Russia and its resources to Western plutocrats. That's what the problem is.
The war continues!
In the context of all these apparent contradictions in the Trump administration's actions, Palantir, who perfectly fits into the logic of current events and our times in general, plays an crucial role. As admin of the Pentagon's Maven system, it is located at the heart of the American war device and, due to lucrative contracts with the Pentagon, will usage any influence and money to guarantee that the war never ends. And it doesn't substance whether it's a war against Russia, Iran, or an endless war against terrorism, which now takes the form of a war against the peoples of the planet being chased into a global concentration camp.
Without doubt, the interests of globalist financiers and the arms and technology sector have perfectly merged in the individual of Donald Trump, who is in close relations with the founder and president of the Palantir supervisory board, Peter Thiel. And if you look at the executive manager of Palantir, Alex Karp., it is an highly disgusting war instigator who believes that he defends all Western civilization and that killing masses of people with artificial intelligence has a saving dimension and is necessary. This individual about the flagship mentality is in turn a close friend of the erstwhile Minister of Defence of Ukraine, Mikhail Fyodorovaby which Palantir is ubiquitous in Ukraine, playing a leading function in the drone war against Russia. Karp admitted it was Palantir who chose most of the targets that attack Ukraine in the depths of Russia. It should be stressed that all of them have an utmost deficiency of moral principles, manifested in unbridled greed and power.
Comfortable secrecy, which is the key function of the CIA
The way in which the war is presently being waged, from the position of American and European politicians, does not matter, due to the fact that they are safe and far distant from the fighting hustle. For them, the realities of war are abstract, like video games. That's why Trump, speaking of bombing Iran, speaks as if he were at most active in a cowboy execution in the chaotic West. He does not seem to announcement the barbaricity of war at all, which in the short word is profitable for politicians like him, and the behind business catering.
This is all at the expense of the American and European taxpayers, of course, due to the fact that their crazy policies both the president of the United States and his European vassals accumulate powerful debts that will multiply the wealth of the fewer and will exacerbate the poorness of millions. Let's not fool ourselves, these debts will not be repaid by Palantir, Lokheed Martin or Chevron, but by average people. Under the pretext of conducting “right” wars with “aggressive” Russia or “terroristic” Iran, with the ominous shadow of China hanging over the world, there is simply a immense transfer of public money to private accounts in the West.
In order not to explain themselves to the public, American political and business elites had already placed the very centre of American CIA abroad policy decades ago. From the point of view of the occupying United States of interest groups, this is convenient, due to the fact that if something is secret, it can be denied. If something is secret, it is adequate to say that it is simply a substance of national safety and there is no request to explain anything to the public. So secrecy is 1 of the most crucial factors in American abroad policy.
From the point of view of the average man it is simply a disaster that can lead to atomic war and the end of our civilization, but for Trump and the environment that he represents, there is no hazard in it, due to the fact that no of them are responsible. Everything happens mostly in secret and on credit, and from a U.S. position it can take a long time, due to the fact that there are circumstantial force groups that have an interest in not ending it. And lobby number 1 is, of course, a widely understood military-industrial complex, or alternatively industrial-technology complex.
The most active war lobbyists are presently Silicon Valley, headed by Palantir, Space X and another technological corporations, due to the fact that they test their high-tech weapons systems in combat realities. This is subject to specified fast advancement that the change of the full technological generation occurs within weeks and months at most. Alex Karp does not admire the fast improvement of technologies to kill Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, to deliberately destruct civilian infrastructure in Iran, or to strike deep in Russia. Meanwhile, American society has no real control over this, and so is Western European countries. All this scam is hiding behind the CIA's name, which allows the elite to proceed this lucrative game so easy as a real war.
Put Russia on your knees
However, it is not possible to preserve specified a vast and wickedly acquired wealth and to guarantee that it continues to multiply without gaining absolute power, preferably on a global level. A wonderful possible opened after the dissolution of the russian Union, on the second day of Christmas 1991. At that time, it was the Talmudic-Anglossian elite who commissioned the CIA to mark Russia's final kneecap. The activity initiated at the time included a coherent doctrine Zbigniew Brzeziński in the 1997 book large Chess. Its subtitle, the Primate of America and its geostrategic imperatives, is peculiarly notable and much to say, which gives meaning to all American abroad policy at the time. Indeed, it was a permanent submission to Russia to the United States. After Russia, China was to be next. Nothing has changed since then.
One way to accomplish this goal is by what Brzeziński called the countries of geopolitical return. These are those countries that in themselves have no meaning for Americans but 1 – they can be utilized as their tools against large powers. At the top of the list of specified states Brzeziński placed Ukraine, because, as he pointed out aptly, as shortly as the Americans "require" Ukraine, Russia will cease to be a power.
Although this thought was formulated decades ago, it is consistently implemented, despite the fact that during this process people are killed and millions are injured concretely, completely unrelated to this idea. In front of our eyes, Ukraine is falling apart as a state, but for the thirsty domination of the planet ruling the United States, it does not matter. Therefore, the war they waged in Ukraine will proceed without unnecessary remorse as long as they consider it necessary.
The second geopolitical country of return on the Brzeziński list was Iran, identified by it as crucial due to the location and resources of the country for the Gulf and Caspian Sea region. Who controls Iran controls everything, and thus has dominance over the planet and its resources. So all of this goes very profoundly (not only into the past) and fundamentally has small to do with Trump, although he perfectly embodies greed, corruption, and the force of Talmudic-Anglossian envoys. He's just a puppet in their hands, just like his predecessors at the U.S. President's office, starting with Bill Clinton.
Taking the office of president in 1993, Clinton set a course according to which the goal of the American elite was the global domination of the US over the world. Although the thought itself appeared in a 1992 (a fewer weeks after the collapse of the USSR) by Paul Wolfowitz Pentagon strategy for presidency George Bush The elder (the alleged Doctrine of Wolfowitz), but it was Clinton who directed America on this path. For this reason, it can be said that Clinton's presidency, Bush the younger, Barack Obama, Trump in their first term, Joe Biden and Trump in their second word have the same common denominator—an endless war. Wolfowitz's doctrine of fundamentally eliminating U.S. competitors in Eurasia is up-to-date and persistently implemented to this day.
Everyone wanted peace, the United States chose war
What is peculiarly interesting, in the time erstwhile Wolfowitz's doctrine was established, all the signs on earth and heaven indicated that lasting peace, specified as for many generations, was at hand. 1992 was the very minute erstwhile everyone in Europe wanted peace, but above all it was the Russians who wanted peace and average life, that is, like in the West. Therefore, then Russia opened wide to the West, practically subjugating to it its economy. All of this, however, was rejected by the then political elites of the United States, who did not want peace but full domination of the world. Not only did they not want Russia to get back on its feet, but they wanted Brzeziński to break up into 3 weak states: European Russia, Siberian Russia and Far East Russia. Later, we heard this from Anna Fotyga, Minister of abroad Affairs of the Republic of Poland during the first regulation of the Law and Justice. All of this, of course, was to preserve American dominance.
NATO has become a military guarantor of this dominance, which, as the secretary-general pointed out in the act of sincerity, Mark Rutte “It is utilized to task American forces.” So it is not about security, but about the projection of force as part of the implementation of the thought of American dominance over the world, which has not changed for 35 years or the Jota. America seeks dominance, which means being safe and surviving in prosperity is not enough.
Unfortunately, everything points to the North Atlantic Pact being a tool in the hands of Americans to accomplish dominance from the beginning of its existence. What happened in the first weeks after the collapse of the russian Union (Doctrine Wolfowitz) shows that the cold war struggles were not about the welfare of millions of people enslaved by the "imperium of evil", but only about the US gaining dominance over the world. If not, NATO would be dissolved the day after the Warsaw Pact was dissolved. So who was truly here for the full postwar period of the "imperium of evil"?
The presumption that the United States would win was the weakest point of the Brzeziński concept. His main thesis was that America would hold the position of planet leader, due to the fact that no 1 could compare with it and never equalize itself in the economic, technological and military sphere. But after 30 years, this proved to be untruthful, and not only due to China's development. The U.S. has besides completely misjudged Iran, viewing this country as a relic of a medieval state that will break up as shortly as the American technological-military power hits it. Meanwhile, Iran is simply a high-tech state that has been preparing for decades to defend itself against the expected aggression of the United States.
The Fiducial Power of America
However, the bankruptcy of Brzeziński's thought does not halt the American war device in its efforts to implement its dominance strategy. By 28 February 2026, it was based with good results not so much on the large military possible of the United States, but on creating an impression of technological superiority and insurmountability. They were all to believe that the United States was an undisputed power with which no 1 could compare. Operation Absolute Resolve (the kidnapping of Venezuelan President) Nicolas Maduro on the night of the 2rd to 3rd January 2026) seemed to even strengthen this impression, but the losing war with Iran changed everything.
But did that make a difference in the American administration? Of course not, due to the fact that the Americans, as long as they effort to prosecute a dominance strategy, will not admit defeat. America must constantly declare (now Donald Trump's mouth) that it wins. Of course, this is not the case, due to the fact that after the bloodshed and demolition caused by the US and Israel, it turns out that Iran is winning, destroying the full US effort so far and making America's increasingly little serious future claims to planet domination.
To the supporters of the global primacy of America, it is simply a disaster, although they inactive pretend that things are completely different. And they will do so as long as they can unpunishedly make monstrous budget deficits, bearing no work for it either before corrupt legislature or even before the public. Even if Democrats get a fewer extra seats in legislature in November elections, it won't change anything, due to the fact that as the last 35 years have shown, it's not about organization differences.
Everything... that means nothing.
Brzeziński felt that geopolitics was primarily a substance of territory. It so attributed peculiar importance to Eurasia as an area where most of the world's territory, population and resources are concentrated. Therefore, from the Washington point of view, there are 3 front lines: with Russia in the west of Eurasia, with China in the east and with Iran in the southwest. From Washington's point of view, these are the 3 main countries to be overcome, and it is these 3 countries that the United States are presently in conflict.
But in order to accomplish this goal, America has designated a circumstantial function for the front states, specified as Ukraine and Poland in the west, which without remorse can be sacrificed on the altar of the war on the dominance of the US over the world. However, seeing Ukraine bleed to death, we see more and more signs of pushing straight into the war of all Europe. The United States is putting everything on the line, due to the fact that if they do not defeat Russia, Iran and China, they will push these countries into an even closer alliance.
So it seems that we have reached a very dangerous minute erstwhile conflicted countries are willing to go at large risk. It is clear to the bare eye that the crucial component of Trump's diplomacy focuses on shifting the burden of war on the shoulders of Europe. If we look at how much Europe's position has intensified with respect to Russia since Trump came to power, we must admit that he is doing very well. But even the Secretary of State Marco Rubio has large doubts that Europe will bear the burden of war.
The situation is so dangerous that the Americans did not see a fundamental mistake in Brzeziński's concept, which assumed that the US's technological advantage was so large and reliable that Russia would never be able to counter it. Of course, it all turned out to be false. How ironic it is now that Brzeziński's thesis was said in 1997 that no American strategy would be stupid adequate to push Russia, China and Iran towards itself. Meanwhile, America did precisely that, and it was not just a tactical reaction of these 3 countries to the aggressiveness of America, but it became a strategical project.
Course for peace and cooperation
Broadly understood Eurasian cooperation should be the direction to which all the crucial geopolitical actors in the area should go. They would undoubtedly make very successful political and economical links. China and Russia have a natural economical complementarity, and in the face of the aggressive actions of the West besides political. Their alliance is not immediate tactics, but deep, mutually beneficial economical ties. The same applies to Iran and China. Therefore, the alliance between the 3 countries seems rather logical and even natural.
As far as the economy is concerned, the same can be said about Europe and Russia. Europe is rich in natural resources and at the same time very densely populated, while Russia has a low population density, but it is rich in natural resources, which provides an excellent basis for common economical complementarity. On the basis of this complementarity at the far west end of Eurasia, Europe could flourish, but it itself separates itself from its natural trading partners, Russia and China. The ostentatically declared motive for this mad action is to defend advanced moral standards in global relations. The real motive is to act to preserve American dominance over the world, which is expected to defend Europe from the non-existent threat from the Russian Federation.
Unfortunately, Europe does not realize that the United States and the ruling Old Continent globalist elites are not her friend at all. Naïvely believing that American domination would guarantee her safety, Europe was incapable to emergence above vassal relations with the United States and was driven into the proverbial goat horn. If European politicians read Brzeziński, they would have seen that already 30 years ago European allies of the United States were seen by Washington as vassals, and that is now even more obvious.
Perhaps the best hope of getting out of this madness of pride and greed is the increasing awareness of people in the US and Europe who are very tired of all this and see that what their ruling elites are doing is not in their interest. The people of the Euratlantic region see the fast disintegration of their countries. And it is not just a demographic disaster or a rapidly increasing impoverishment of societies, it is even a disintegration of ever-worse infrastructure. All of this is subject to a powerful demoralization that destroys the spiritual foundations of these countries. Europe is 1 step distant from civilization's implosion.
Meanwhile, in the face of the impending disaster, Western leaders can only afford to declare that their goal is to fight Russia. Rather, we can be certain that no of them would have sobered up even if the war had actually begun. On the contrary, they would surely see fresh prospects for fast enrichment. Meanwhile, average people who do not want war act like blind people wandering in absolute darkness. Having a moral-deprived liberal strategy of values, they can't do anything due to the fact that they don't know what to do.
To make yourself independent, and quickly
The full nightmare we are experiencing present was built on the thought of an American primacy and on forcing European vassal states to accept this logic so that the United States could dominate Eurasia. The binder that unites Europe for this unrealistic thought is printed into the minds of Europeans a lie that the Russian Federation poses a deadly threat to Europe. The blinding of this lie does not let Europeans to see that the thought of American dominance over the planet is an unrealistic task that rapidly brings our continent closer to atomic war.
As Poles, we are no exception here, and this is not optimistic observation. Entering the Euro-Atlantic planet nearly 4 decades ago, we now bear all the negative consequences. In order to save ourselves, the first thing we gotta do is rapidly make ourselves independent, literally. Only then will we look to the eye and be able to break with the leading us towards the abyss with a confessional paradigm that Russia is our enemy. We request to halt reasoning in these categories and at the same time start reasoning in terms of national interest.
If we do not do this, we will become even more payers of the bills drawn by the United States for their wars. And paying bills (not only financial, but besides political) is inevitable and will not be pleasant. So we gotta get off this suicide train as shortly as possible, due to the fact that as the war in Ukraine has shown, the Americans do not intend to pay for their bloody fights – they are only curious in profits. Ultimately, as the United States correctly defined in 1925 president Calvin Coolidge, business of the America is business.
Krzysztof Warecki
photo of wikipedia
Think Poland, No. 37-38 (13-20.09.2026)
