Koniuszewski: Yellow World

China's trendy. Beijing that, Beijing that! Everyone knows about them. The mediate State itself behaves highly carefully and cautiously. There's no rage on that side. In turn there is intense attention and deep thought, embedded in their long tradition.

Presenting the problem in a simplified version, I see it this way: their current economical successes, in the wake of them and political ones, can only consequence from purely racial reasons. And it's from racism, not any cultural, civilizational, or situational, but I'd say biological racism. What is it? any scholars say that their successes are the work of the oldest civilization in the world, which supposedly lasts the longest among others and most importantly continuously. To any extent, yes, but improvement has been interrupted many times, sometimes their achievements have been systematically destroyed with rage and fierceness.

There are besides those who realize their success as a culmination and summary. They derive everything from their spiritual and philosophical systems, due to the fact that that is what their top beliefs are: Confucianism, Shintoism, and Buddhism. Yes, they are mysterious to us. Spirituality matters and surely contributes. Unlike for example Christianity, in the centuries-old process of addition and subtraction, they do not change. Catholicism, especially our another engravings, is subject to much greater transformations. The European continuity of civilization against their background, certainly, is much more cunning. There are besides supporters of the thesis that improvement is simply a consequence of quinocentrism with large ideological intensity, and they themselves are actually an island. Only by appearance can they be considered part of Eurasia. In the east, the mighty Pacific, the western mountains and endless deserts, while in the south, the jungles and the deadly climate. China is an oasis, specified as Britain and Japan. To a large degree besides the United States. However, all these explanations are insufficient. In my opinion, much more convincing is the argument that the improvement of the Han people for centuries has been profoundly organistic. Colonization of fresh areas has always been associated with agricultural expansion. So the conquest was conducted, not by soldiers, but by peasants with their families. This was repeated after centuries by Protestant sects in North America. But that is not all.

Due to the arable systems and tools (mainly wooden ones) the essential work effort was comparable to the effort in the garden and vegetable cultivation system. This is impressive, so hard work, large pain and perseverance. I mean, it's just... it's just... Still, individual could ask, so what? In fact, nothing but 1 thing: why were these people, in this isolated place for so long? The Darwinists say, possibly even with pleasure, that Han comes from a different being than the white people. This is due to the discovery in Chinese areas of bones and skulls different from those attributed to the predecessors of Europeans. It would make sense to agree with the thought that people there are always there today. The importance of wandering peoples and another movements is seemingly secondary. So the eventual success was decided by racial qualities? That's it!

Antoni Koniuszewski

Think Poland, No. 19-20 (11-18.05.201025)