Politics is starting to match the planet of celebrities and influencers, where without regular sensation there is no life. Competition in these industries became very dense, erstwhile in the function of first personalities there were individual characters, though cult character Janusz Koriwna-Mikke. present in the Sejm we will find a full list of peculiarities that pretend to be personalities, and at the same time attract attention with “oops”. In this matter, you are superior due to the fact that "oops" usually concerns the unbuttoned bra or exposed panties, men have somewhat worse.
It is besides widely known that fans take on the habits of idols, so the net is barking under the weight of all kinds of sensations, from devouring 100 doughnuts in a 4th of an hr to swallowing the chain from the combustion saw. The constant practice of politicians is besides judicial processes and notices to the prosecutors in the most absurd matters, and this is precisely the way chosen by the advanced Silesia resident. Gerard Weychert lives regular under Wodzisław Śląski and is the president of the Mining Housing Cooperative in Jastrzębie-Zdrój.
Mr. Weichert's processive activity shows that he has no sympathy Andrzej Duda and how 1 can guess the full camp of the “United Right”. He was determined to express this by means of a curiosity suit for violation of individual property. What's interesting is that the lawyer signed under this curiosium:
(...) Through actions and omissions of the president of the Republic of Poland Andrzej Duda, there was a violation of the regulation of law resulting from the Constitution, which in turn violated the right of the plaintiff to live in a state — the Republic of Poland, in which the authorities respect the regulation of law.
At first glance, you can see that both gentlemen are supporters of the eight-star slogan and have something to do with the "Strength Together" group, but it's not that simple. Gerard Weychert is simply a erstwhile associate of the PiS, but fell out of the game after a conflict in regional structures with associate Grzegorz Matusiak and his brother Andrzej, Councillor of the PiS. Weychert accused both politicians of corruption and impunity, but these allegations never confirmed, hence abruptly the disappointed president of the housing cooperative saw the destroyed justice system.
Please note all legal acts that led to the demolition of the justice strategy in Poland, all of these laws were previously parliamentary projects. no of them can be formally attributed to Jarosław Kaczyński, or Zbigniew Ziobrze, but to entirely random MPs caught in the seismic corridors. Therefore, there is only 1 individual left to sign these laws that destruct the regulation of law, and that is Andrzej Duda.
The control to the another side of the barricade is not surprising, unfortunately it is frequently a phenomenon, but citizens of “smiling Poland” have seemingly not noticed that the power in Poland has changed from “putinism” to “terror of the regulation of law” and in this fresh country Andrzej Duda has small to say. It would besides be appropriate to know that human rights and citizens' rights are the other of individual property, which was explained by the territory Court in Warsaw to the plaintiff and attorney.
The right to live in a democratic state of law is simply a common good for all citizens, but no longer a individual good. It affects the quality of human life, but it does come from “outside” – a fragment of the oral justification, delivered by justice Magdalena Antosiewicz.
Of course, the court found the suit unfounded and as always in specified cases the plaintiff must bear the costs of the trial, but it seems that president Gerard Weychert does not number for the costs, due to the fact that his attorney-in-chief Michał Migas has already announced the appeal. I think the counsel will besides want to learn what his message suggests that he is considering referring to Supreme Court Legal question: ‘Is the right to live in a democratic state of law a individual good’.
If you'd been very careful in your first-year class, you'd be able to separate between the common and the personal. Unfortunately, something about education went wrong, to the point that counsellors with their clients can't separate between court proceedings about painting 8 stars on walls and social accounts.
And it would be so much fun if not for the fact that specified "trials" block serious citizens not only the protection of individual property, but besides judicial decisions having a fundamental impact on their lives. Therefore, no substance which side political dispute In this way, she is entertained, and should bear as much as possible procedural but besides social costs.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
