We express our hope that the challenge posed to the Polish nation and its typical authorities will not stay unanswered and those liable for setting up the ABOTAK abortion centre will be brought to justice and will be fined. We do not agree and we do not let specified anti-human, illegal and retroactive actions to spread in our Homeland – writes the Pro-Life Institute of thought commenting on the beginning of the abortion facility in Warsaw.
He says: “We will not remainder in the defence of the unborn, we will not tire out and we will not tire! We assure you that ABOTAK will never be left alone by us! And referring to the loud beginning of the disgraceful point on Women's Day 8.03, we want to emphasize that it is for us all female is precious—and mother, and this small woman, only increasing under her mother's heart.”
Below we present the full content of the position:
Position of the Pro-Life Institute of Thought
on the beginning of the ABOTAK abortion ‘receipt’
With large sadness, pain and outrage we received the information about the beginning of the alleged First Abortive ABOTAK Clinic in Warsaw.
The establishment of this facility aimed at access to the unpunished killing of unborn children, the pro-abortional “education”, the promotion of murders and the distribution of abortion pills is barbarism, which is not equal in the past of Poland.
The IMPL points out that the beginning of a ‘retired clinic’ means a complete violation of the law in force in Poland.
- [Unlawful operation of ABOTAK’s abortion ‘receipt’] As you can learn from the abotak.org website, since 17 March has been operating the abortion clinic ABOTAK. By the word “patient clinic”, its creators propose that their aim is to carry out activities in the field of medicinal activities, offering “support in the conduct of pharmacological abortion”. This, in turn, means that the legal regulations relating to specified entities should be applied to the established ‘representative’.
- In accordance with the regulations governing medical activities in Poland, i.e. the Act of 15 April 2011 on medicinal activities (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act on Medical Activities’).d.l.’:
- the medical activity involves the provision of wellness benefits (Article 3(1) of the U.D.I.). However, wellness benefits include another medical activities resulting from separate provisions governing their implementation. specified a pharmacological abortion may be considered acceptable in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 7 January 1993 on household Planning, Protection of the Human Fetal and Conditions of Acceptability of Abortion;
- Outpatient wellness services are provided in the infirmary, which includes, among others, the clinic (Article 12(3) of the Act). The clinic. is so the name determining a medical establishment where outpatient wellness benefits are provided[1].
- the clinic may run, inter alia, a foundation whose statutory intent is to carry out wellness tasks and whose statutes licence the pursuit of medical activities (Article 4(5)(d));
- the individual who intends to carry out a medical activity as a medical agent, the clinic, must apply for registration of the entities performing the medical activity (Article 100(1) of the U.D.I.)
- the facilities and facilities of the infirmary, including the clinic, shall comply with the requirements appropriate to the kind of medical activity carried out, including, inter alia, the sanitary and installation conditions (Article 22(1) to (3) of the U.D.L.)[2] .
- the body keeping the registry (voivoda) shall be entitled to check the entities carrying out the medical activity in respect of compliance with the provisions laying down the conditions for the performance of the medical activity (Article 111(1) in conjunction with Article 106(1)(1));
- the individual empowered to inspect the clinic is besides the Minister liable for wellness (Article 118(1) of the Code).
- In the case of the ‘receipt’ ABOTAK, the illegality of the action concerns each of the above-mentioned planes:
- Above all, ABOTAK’s ‘doctoral clinic’ does not have the right to offer support in conducting pharmacological abortion. In Poland there is legal protection of human life in the prenatal phase. Only by way of exception were derogations from this regulation allowed[3]. Moreover, only a doctor can legally execute a pharmacological abortion[4];
- from the “patient clinic” side, you can find out that a woman, before going to the clinic, should order pills from Women aid Woman, which, as noted, is simply a temporary solution, due to the fact that yet pills for pharmacological abortion will be offered straight in the “patient clinic”. The Women aid Women page lacks an indication of what kind of tablets a female should order, the more no information about their side effects is given. On the another hand, what pills can be learned from the website of another abortion organization – Federa. These tablets are: Mifepriston – and as indicated on the website – “The medicine has not been authorised in Poland” and Misoprostol, who was not allowed to have a pharmacological abortion[5]. Women are so offered tablets that have not undergone detailed assessments and studies in Poland to confirm that they are safe, effective and meet quality requirements in performing pharmacological abortions.;
- According to the abotak.org website, the clinic operates by defining it as ‘our project’ under KRS No 0000507234. According to a copy of the KRS, the FANIMANI Foundation is registered under this number. The main nonsubjective of her activities is to nurture, advance and support education, science, education, physical culture, education and sport, as well as another pro-development activities. For the purposes indicated there are no wellness concerns at all. In turn, the statutes available on the Foundation website[6]does not licence the pursuit of medicinal activities. In this same way, the full illegality of ABOTAK's abortion “receipt” is besides visible on this level;
- Of course, ABOTAK's abortion clinic was not included in the registry of medical professionals, i.e. besides the clinic[7];
- acting in the form of a clinic requires a number of requirements, including sanitation. Therefore, they should besides apply to the “abortionary” of ABOTAK.
- The above allegations surely do not exhaust the catalogue of deficiencies which the alleged abortion clinic ABOTAK permits. Its activities are completely unlawful and require the intervention of the applicable state authorities.
- [State supervision of ABOTAK’s ‘restraint’] A copy of the full KRS shows that the activities of the FANIMANI Foundation, which according to the website runs the ‘opportunity’ of ABOTAK, are supervised by the Minister of National Education. In the context of the foundation's beginning of a ‘retired clinic’, this supervision is completely inadequate, even ridiculous. It is absurd that the activity of supporting women in pharmacological abortion should be supervised by the Minister of National Education! This is simply a mockery of Polish law and Polish supervisory authorities. How could there be an illegal organization in Poland, which is called a democratic state of law, that is not decently supervised!
- If all clinic in Poland has to meet a number of requirements and is subject to supervision by specified state authorities as the Provincial or Minister of Health, then what right does ABOTAK have not to be subject to specified requirements!
- For the deficiency of registration of a medical activity in the form of a clinic, sanctions as described in Article 147a(1) of the Code of Offence, i.e. detention, restrictions on freedom or fine, are threatened.
- Also, urging the acquisition of non-marketing tablets in Poland to execute a pharmacological abortion demands that law enforcement authorities check and draw the appropriate consequences[8].
- [ Misleading about the legality of the action] However, it is possibly most amazing that the creators of ABOTAK's abortion clinic stated that "The operation of the Abotak clinic is full in accordance with the applicable rules. Neither us nor those utilizing our services are threatening any legal consequences. We remind you that ceasing your pregnancy is not criminal, and the pharmacological abortion we support is legal.“[9]. ABOTAK’s claim that the “responsible” activities are legal, in the light of the Law in Poland, is even curiosible. Not only is he misleading, but he besides shows that the creators of the “carry” have no right to ignore them completely, feeling complete impunity. Moreover, it may be the origin of the investigation by law enforcement authorities to guarantee that there is no fraud as referred to in Article 286(1) k.k.[10].
- It should besides be stressed that ‘support’ offered by the ‘trainhouse’ is in fact an aid to the deprivation of the unborn child's life, which in Poland constitutes an offence as described in Article 152(2) of the Code.[11]
- Misleading besides has another aspect – ABOTAK is not a legally functioning clinic. It is crucial that the name “the clinic” itself is associated with a place where legal assistance can be obtained, decently supervised and safe. In the meantime, this ‘retired clinic’ is neither legal nor safe. In no way can he compare himself to the clinics any average citizen thinks of. Its operations request control and closure!
- In addition, the usage of the name ‘the clinic’ in the case of the ABOTAK point is manipulation due to the fact that it is by definition a word attributed to medical assistance. Meanwhile, there are no doctors at ABOTAK, and the mediation offered to get abortion tablets is simply a violation of Polish law: mifepriston, as it was already mentioned in Poland, is not authorised, and Cytotec and Arthrotec are registered in another indications than abortion and killing an unborn child. In this way, the services provided in fact impersonate medical services, and if any doctor were to grant them, he would immediately gotta stand before a medical court and be deprived of his right to prosecute a profession.
In the light of the above circumstances, the Pro-Life Institute of thought besides wishes to point out that the beginning of the Abotak “carryer” at Wiejska Street, in the vicinity of the Polish Parliament, the seat of the highest legislative authority in our country is not only a criminal action, but besides a provocative, highly disrespectful sovereign, which is the Nation of Poland, which entrusted its chosen people with the management of the state.
It's a slap aimed at all of us.
We express our hope that the challenge posed to the Polish nation and its typical authorities will not stay unanswered and those liable for setting up the ABOTAK abortion centre will be brought to justice and will be fined. We do not agree and we do not let specified anti-human, illegal and retroactive actions to spread in our homeland.
We will not remainder in defence of the unborn – we will not get tired and we will not get tired! We assure you that ABOTAK will never be left alone by us! And referring to the loud beginning of the disgraceful point on Women's Day 8.03, we want to emphasize that it is for us all female is precious – and mother, and this small woman, only increasing under her mother's heart.
Pro-Life Institute of Thought
[1] Ciechorski Jan, Medical Activity Act. Comment to selected recipes, Published: LEX/el. 2024
[2] The detailed provisions in this respect are contained in the Regulation of the Minister of wellness of 26 March 2019 on the detailed requirements to be met by the premises and facilities of the performing body.
[3] Articles 1 and 4a of the Act of 7 January 1993 on household Planning, Protection of the Human Fetal and Conditions of Acceptability of Abortion.
[4] Article 4a(1) of the abovementioned Act.
[5] https://federna.org.pl/af-drawing/
[6] https://fanimani.pl/o-nas/
[7] This can be checked by entering KRS in the search engine at https://rpwdl.ezdro.gov.pl/RPM/Search
[8] Article 125(2), point (2), Article 125a of the Pharmaceutical Law Act
[9] https://abotak.org The answer to the question of ‘Is the operation of the clinic legal’ is published on the website.
[10] Anyone who, in order to get a property benefit, brings another individual to an adverse regulation with his or her own property or another property by misleading him or by exploiting an mistake or inability to decently realize the action taken shall be subject to imprisonment from 6 months to 8 years.
[11] This is confirmed by the judgments of the courts: e.g. the judgement of the Court of Appeal in Katowice of 30 September 2008 in Case II AKa 231/08; the judgement of the Court of Appeal in Gdańsk in Case II AKa 294/16.
