According to the Constitution, abroad policy is conducted by the government and the president of Poland cooperating with the Prime Minister and ministers. Meanwhile, although the constitution has not changed, diplomacy has decided to take the Marshal of the Sejm's hands off. He gave a speech in which he insulted the president of the United States, and thus self-appointed as the 3rd executive centre in Poland, conducting abroad policy.
This case is worth describing, due to the fact that it focuses, as in lens, all the pathologies of Polish politics, and in the media was played in an highly false light. It was like this: The talker of the home of Representatives asked the Sejm to support Donald Trump's candidacy for the Nobel Peace Prize. The law firm of the Sejm replied in a balanced tone. And that would be the end of it, if not for the fact that Vladimir Czarzasty decided to set up a media circus – he went to the cameras and scold Trump. After specified a provocation, the U.S. Ambassador stated that "with immediate effect we will no longer be in contact or communicating with the talker of the Sejm", and stated, as a reason, "an outrageous and unjustified insult to the president of the United States". And then it went downhill – we had, as we utilized to say, a four-fire fight. Sikorski and his wife contributed. And then, like winding monkeys, another ministers, MPs and editors from Michnik jumped out of the box.
In whose name did the Black man speak? Since the Sejm did not hold the mandate and had no constitutional right to do so. Who shot it? Tusk, Sikorski and everyone who had previously attacked the president of Poland for interfering with abroad policy, although he has the right to do so. Not much – Radek Sikorski announced that he would request explanations, but not from Czarzaste, but from the US Ambassador, from whom he wanted to know whether the announcement of breaking contacts with Czarzaste was Washington's authoritative position.
It wasn't an emotional leap. It was cold-cut provocation, calculated to worsen the relation with the US. due to the fact that it is excluded that Czarzasty should not consult Sikorski, Sikorski acted without Tusk's permission, and Tusk without instructions from Berlin. Targets were three: Emotionally stone the electorate breathing utmost hatred of Trump. To provoke the Law and Justice to defend the ambassador's "eminent shoe and arrogance," and thus persuade
To Poles that PiS is blindly pro-American, and accuses us of hanging at the doorknob of the German Chancellor. And kiss the patrons of Berlin. This besides had a broader dimension than the implementation of political procurement. The black man truly said: Trump, we hatred you for everything, and especially for the fact that you shut down the U.S.I.D. agency, which has been furry with billions of dollars worldwide without which we would not regain power in Poland.
Tusk draws full handfuls from the methods of safety utilized in the times of the organization youth of Black: “Good militiaman, bad militiaman”. And he makes the evil militia, and he makes the good militia, Kosiniak-Kamish, who says to the ambassador: Poland is 1 of the most reliable allies of the United States ... This is noted and appreciated by our allies from the United StatesIt’s okay. ” But what's not crucial is whether he's fooled by good Milicz Vladek. due to the fact that what a fool and a brat to make Poland the most anti-American scout, the leader in pulling Trump's pants.
Tom Rose united the Polish political scene. In the defence of the Czarzaste there were KOs and PiSs, utmost left and utmost right, judaic komun and firefighting front. SThe ambassador's half outraged the president RP: ‘It is not good for Poland if the ambassador of a abroad state, even a large power and our friend, disciplines the Polish talker of the Sejm.” The tide of national pride was felt by netizens, recognising Czarzasty as a “real statesman and patriot” who showed that Polish is simply a sovereign state, to which “no 1 will jump.” The same group of sold renegades abruptly turned into unbreakable defenders of Polish dignity and took the Polish state ration to wipe their mouths off.
The most amazing thing was that Sławomir Mentzen was active in the action, taking Czarzasty in defense: The fact that MPs are morons and chose a post-communist is 1 thing, but this is our post-communist and no Americans will tell us who is to be the marshal of the Polish Sejm. He besides demanded that the MFA call the ambassador “to the rug” and indicate to him “its place in a row”. Mentzen, however, overlooked that the ambassador did not request the Czarzasty resignation or indicate who would take his place. The charge of the leader of the Confederate was so swindled and invented for the request to defend “our post-communist”. The fact that Blacks are “our post-communist” has not been signed by Confederate voters. Instead, they urged Mentzen to talk in his name and talk of “my post-communist.”
On a slanted tree this and a goat come - Yes says the old Polish proverb. Kiedy respective twelve abroad ambassadors signed a supporting letter The loose march of pederasts and lesbians, followed by the ambassador of Ireland and his husband wandering on Warsaw streets, andmbasador Sweden submitted flowers by the rainbow in the Savior's Square and made out publically with Robert Biedron, pWe rub our eyes with amazement. This was a classical example of the mixing of abroad diplomats into the interior affairs of the state that their guests had. But it is hard to be surprised, since the Polish state – let us quote Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz – exists only theoretically. In a normal, respectable country, pthe MFA consequence was needed, call for all who signed the letter to the Ministry of abroad Affairs and request explanations. In the meantime it is pRemier Mateusz Morawiecki explained to the signatories of the letter, what a tolerant country Poland has been for centuries, and his minister expressed the contention that the letter does not duplicate lies about “ LGBT-free zones”. And what was the correct response? Ambassador of the Republic of Poland to Berlin as initiator of the letter of ambassadors against the “severing growth of anti-Semitism in Germany”.
In April 2022, the bailout of the russian building complex at 100 Sobieski Street in Warsaw, known as “Spywo” began. Representatives of the city appeared outside the gate of the property. Ukrainian ambassador to Poland Andrij Deszczyca besides showed up, who told the media that he intended to enter the building and suspend the Ukrainian flag and authoritatively assured that the buildings would service Ukraine and Ukraine. He besides made amazing words: I have a proposal for them (Russian). Let them give us Donbas and Crimea, we will give you “Spy”. A in At the same time, Swoboda organization MPs began work on the Law on Territorial Claims against Poland in the ultimate Council of Ukraine, and Rainforest publically accused Poles of genocide in the Ukrainians. These insolent words were not answered by the Ministry. The president of Warsaw did not protest. And the only reactionPresident Andrzej Duda was awarded the Cmdr Cross Deszczyca with the Star of the Order of Merit, “in designation of the distinguished merits in developing cooperation between Poland and Ukraine”.
The American ambassadors were outraged, but they were silent erstwhile they treated their diplomats in a rude way from a shitty tropical state. For the words “The language spoken about the PiS [...] is to be treated as Jews by Goebbels”, Like a student Undercut the Deputy Prime Minister of the Polish Government Ambassador of Israel Anna Azari: “I just don't want to see any more quotes like that.It’s okay. ” Piotr Gliński He was just licking himself. And the Prime Minister was cowardly silent. Let us just add that she showed so much contempt towards the pro-Jewish fanatic who gave 100 million to the judaic cemetery and the another so much to the judaic theatre. Similarly, her predecessors became appalled. David Peleg called to boycott the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Education Roman Giertych for the fact that on the school reading list he wrote the book Adolf Dobraczyński. Alexander Ben Zwi He said: "Once the Confederate enters the Sejm, we'll have a problem.It’s okay. ” Why did he say “We”? It is due to the fact that the Israeli ambassador to Warsaw is among his own and always speaks as if he were a associate of the Polish government.
There are many examples of the immoral behaviour of diplomats:
1. US Ambassador Victor Ashe on embassy page reports that the lodge B’nai B’rith is engaged in the recovery of judaic assets and He announces that with the manager of the lodge he discussed "the issues related to Radio Maryja and tv Trwam".
2. Russia's ambassador greywashed himself at the russian General's memorial, which was to be dismantled by the decision of the local government, due to the fact that the general (the remainder of judaic origin) was liable for the murders and dispatch to the camps of hundreds of soldiers of the Vilnius AK brigade.
3. president Wrocław admits (or he's talking)that police intervention against demonstrators at Zygmunt Bauman's lecture took place on demandConsul of Germany.
4. The “Open Republic” – a confluence of specialists in the fight against Polish “szovinism and anti-Semitism” submits a study to the embassy of the Netherlands, and this funds publication"The speech of hatred", brutally interfering with the interior affairs of Poland and calling for criminal repression against defenders of the good name of Poland.
This is not the first time that the US Ambassador to Poland is getting loud. erstwhile Georgette Mosbacher spoke in defence of TVN, she was accused of defending judaic rations, that she was an envoy of the judaic lobby in Washington and that she was Jewish. Meanwhile, she wasn't as terrible as they painted her. due to the fact that she defended not the judaic interest, but the American business, due to the fact that she had the right, and even the dog's duty. And she is not Jewish, but a simple American girl from the province, and the Jewish-sounding surname she inherited (with millions of dollars) from her judaic husband. And the Polish authorities? alternatively of telling the White home that TVN was Donald Trump's slanderers, they cowardly laid I'm going to go get a stitch And they rushed with assurances of freedom of speech.
In the United States, it's customary that the president who supported him gives him a prize. Well, that's good, due to the fact that an ambassador like that has close contact with the president. Mosbacher has proved respective times that she is able to aid organize meetings, and in an instant, between presidents. She was the 1 who helped in the abolition of humiliating visa restrictions (which Polish diplomacy – if anything – sought unsuccessfully for years). Another advantage was that she never raised, unlike her predecessors, issues of judaic property. The proof that this was the case: After Trump left and Mosbacher was recalled from Warsaw, the judaic paper for Poles triumphed, the administration of Biden turned out to be a judaic communist reconquist, and in Trump's individual we lost an ally. And erstwhile Mark Brzezinski came to Warsaw... we missed Mosbacher.
As for Mosbacher's defence of American businesses and Rose's defence of the President's good name, let us note that in the past of the diplomacy of the 3rd Republic of Poland there was no case for the Polish Ambassador to intervene in the defence of the president of his country as well as the good name of Poland. As for the defence of Polish interests, Polish businessmen are told not only not to ask for aid from the Polish embassy, but to avoid any contact with it and to celebrate its office with a broad arch.
When the media in Poland reported sensational news that "Israeli students were beaten by attackers utilizing Arabic", the reaction was immediate – the Polish MFA issued a message and the Polish Ambassador to Israel announced: "A disgusting act of barbarism. There's no reason for violence. I believe the perpetrators will be arrested soon. I want Yotam and others a fast recoveryIt’s okay. ” The Polish authorities made an global scandal out of the banal incidental that the police station should deal with. The Polish Ministry of abroad Affairs, on the another hand, was cowardly silent erstwhile our embassies in Tel Aviv were smeared with swastika and graffiti: "Murderers fuck up" and "Polish shit". The Ministry of abroad Affairs could not be "provoked" even erstwhile the crowd, consisting of March expatriates, invaded the Polish institution and spat on the Polish ambassador, and Polish tourists were attacked on the public beach in Ejlat. The voice was not taken by the Polish Ministry, nor by the opinion itself, or the 1 who called Yotam's eye a “disgusting act of barbarity”.
Marek Magierowski, as we talk about him, turned out to be the Israeli ambassador to Tel Aviv. This is simply a reasonably common practice in Polish-language diplomacy. Ryszard Schnepf was the Israeli ambassador to Washington (at the same time accredited to the judaic municipality there). Jan Hello was the Ukrainian ambassador to Kiev and the first Polish Ambassador to the European Union, after being recalled for allowing anti-government demonstrations on the embassy stairs, immediately switched to abroad service – he became the EU Ambassador to Warsaw.
Returning to the “Czarzaste” issue, it must be made clear: Ambassador Tom Rose behaved correctly. He couldn't have acted otherwise. The attack on his president had to face a reaction that was neither ‘shocking’ nor ‘disturbing’, but ‘balanced’. He showed the difference between our diplomacy and diplomacy of the real states, consisting in the fact that politicians from the Vistula River always underestimate offensive statements to Poland, and Americans respond immediately in akin situations, that the president of his own country must be defended abroad, even if he originates from the other political camp.
Perhaps the reaction should have been milder (or not at all), but it should be remembered that there is simply a counter-revolution behind the Ocean, after the judaic female recovered from the trauma after Trump's victory, which – what should be said – was beneficial for Poland, including for the Confederation or, above all, for the Confederation. It should besides be remembered that Rose protested against the defamation of Poland by the environments attributing us to participation in the Holocaust, and it is certain that Trump did not send it to Poland to regain judaic property. And let's be clear again: Tom Rose behaved as necessary, and Polish politicians acted as necessary.
On 7 March, in an embassy of Iran after killing the spiritual leader of this country's condolence book, the entry was made by Grzegorz Braun. The U.S. Ambassador commented: “America and Donald Trump will not forget who their friend is, and more importantly, who isn't.It’s okay. ” In his next entry, he made available a video featuring the leader of the Crown and called it “disgusting”. And this is where Mentzen's reaction was needed. For example, with the argument that "this is our anti-Semite and no Americans will tell us who is disgusting."
Finally, the question: Are the politicians of the Confederate (one and the other) able to explain to Poles (assuming that Poles are interested), what is it all about? Do they frequently have to, in a chaotic and unthinkable way, talk on all subject, for example, to have more time to think?
