Japanese scientists afraid about blood transfusions from patients vaccinated on C-19

Authors propose a tracking systemed blood donors’ wellness results; and record the past of erstwhile vaccinations and blood donors infection.

In a preprint published on 15 March, six nipponese doctors and researchers proposed changes in the processing of blood donated by individuals vaccinated against COVID-19 and individuals who have a long past of COVID.

"The first and most crucial first reaction is to make medical staff aware that specified a hazard exists," said The Epoch Times lead author Jun Ued, who has a PhD in integrated natural sciences. Doctors come from renowned nipponese hospitals and universities, including Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo University of Science, Asahikawa Medical University, and Okamura Memorial Hospital.

The authors proposed to set up a surveillance strategy to track the wellness results of blood recipients and evidence erstwhile vaccinations and the past of blood donors infection. They stated that there should be a protocol to check for blood donations for the presence of mRNA vaccine, spike proteins, spike antibodies and abnormal wellness markers. If found, these proteins and biomarkers should be removed.

Dr. Nareg Roubinian, a pulmonologist from Kaiser Permanente and prof. of laboratory medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, said The Epoch Times that blood from vaccinated individuals constitutes “essentially the full current blood pool.”

He said that he was unaware of any technological basis for blood donation from the vaccinated or inmore infected donorsThis was caused by damage. However, knowing that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are associated with various cardiovascular, neurological and immune diseases and that blood recipients have not been subject to long-term observation, nipponese scientists insist on doing more to guarantee safety.

"It should be noted that we do not claim that blood transfusions are dangerous, but alternatively that they exist" various concerns "based on the synthesis of information on spike proteins and another factors" – you wrote Ueda to The Epoch Times.

According to Food and Drug Administration of donors who obtained a affirmative test result for COVID-19, they should refrain from blood donation for at least 10 days after complete resolution of symptoms. If they are asymptomatic, they should refrain from blood donation for at least 10 days from the date of the affirmative test result.

Donors who have received mRNA against COVID-19 may ‘donate blood without a waiting period’, while those who have taken a live attenuated vaccine against COVID-19 should undergo a ‘short waiting period’, e.g. 14 days after receipt vaccines.

Studies in vaccinated individuals have shown that mRNA of COVID-19 can be detected in the blood 15 days after vaccination. Therefore, it may be possible that donated blood contains the vaccine, suggestedadiologist Dr Peter McCullough on his ownthem blog Substack.

He besides feared that blood fromthe individual vaccinated may bedrill spike proteins which have been shown to float freely in the blood for 2 to six months after vaccination.

Lega artis App

Speculative Threats

In Preprints nipponese researchers discussed first of all the different fieldsbirths associated with blood clotting and bleeding associated with vaccines. COVID-19 vaccines origin cells to produce protein spide in the body. highest proteins are naturally present on the surface of SARS-CoV-2 and play a key function in causing viral infection and harm in infected patients.

Spice proteins have been shown to be toxic and may origin inflammation and induce blood clotting. Proteins in the blood form spikes amyloid-like decay-resistant clots. According to Mr Ueda, mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 are besides associated with many different diseases involving all organs and systems.

Last survey nand 99 million people around the planet have been detectedincreased hazard of neurological diseases, including Guillain-Barré syndrome, encephalomyelitis, blood clots in the brain and convulsions among vaccinated individuals. Researchers have besides found that vaccinated people have had multiple increased hazard of myocardial and pericarditis.

So far, no safety signals

Few studies afraid this subject and no reported adverse events following blood transfusions from vaccinated or infected donors. Dr. Roubinian's syndrome compared wellness outcomes among hospitalized adults who received plasma or platelet transfusions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and after the introduction of COVID-19. Patients were followed for up to 30 days, and researchers did not detect any trends in blood clotting associated with each test period.

Dr Roubinian afteredInfect antibody investigating in blood donors for COVID-19 infection and vaccination to measure whether the time of infection or vulnerability to vaccination correlates with adverse events in blood recipients. another treatmentby doctors at Mayo Clinic, published in Blood Advances, afraid plasma donated by individuals vaccinated with hospitalized patients with reduced COVID-19 resistance. Scientists thought that plasma would contain antibodies against COVID-19 to aid patients fight infection.

Thirty Onespatientsplasma ransfusion. Most were treated with remdesivir or steroids that did not appear to aid alleviate symptoms. More than 80 percent of patients survived the transfusion, and the authors did not observe any serious adverse events. More than half of the patients who received the transfusion rapidly improved and were discharged within 5 days, suggesting that treatment may be beneficial. However, nipponese scientists found that no long-term reflection was conducted to regulation out safety concerns.

Possible solutions

"In the current situation where the hazard is not clear, autologous blood transfusions must be thoroughly implemented," Ueda wrote. A review published in Anesthesiology noted that doctors may propose autologous and targeted donations to the blood recipients concerned.

Autol donationIt's all about giving your own blood late.more use, while targeted donation comes from a compatible donor, frequently a friend or household member.

However, the review, conducted by Dr. Katherine Forkin of the University of Virginia, added that specified donations besides entail crucial wellness and cost risks. For example, fewer centres are prepared to handle specified donations and insurance may not cover the costs of procedures.

In addition, donorspatients with anaemia and associated diseases are at hazard if they donate blood. Donating blood by relatives is besides a risk. Blood donation by direct relatives is associated with a higher hazard of developing in the recipient of the disease, a transplant against the host, a possibly fatal disease. Transplant illness against host occurs erstwhile donated immune cells admit the recipient's cells as abroad and begin to attack them, which can lead to infection and harm to organs.

Science or ideology

Common Topicstho blood transfusion whether or not the recipients can request that the position of the donor be disclosed. According to the U.S. Red Cross website, people vaccinated against COVID-19 may donate blood, but they must uncover the name of the vaccine manufacturer. Most blood donation organisations besides execute COVID-19 antibody tests to see if these antibodies can supply immunity to recipients.

In comment cs fears that the publicisation of the position of blood donors for vaccination against COVID-19 may affect blood supply. They besides stated that making specified details public could be discriminatory.

Some doctors say that these discussions are not based on science, but on ideology. any parents refuse to give blood out of fear of harming their children, which raises ethical questions for doctors who consider blood transfusions medically necessary.

In depositions during the Canadian National Citizens Inquiry, the parent claimed that the infirmary would have taken distant her parental rights if she had not agreed to usage the blood donated by the infirmary for the transfusion of her 11-year-old son. Her boy died 12 weeks after the transfusion, and she attributed his death to the procedure.

However, Mr Ueda stressed that his team's article is only about expressing concern, but not "confirmation of concern" due to the fact that it would origin concern and make it hard to resolve the problem. Dr. McCullough said that he believes there is presently no way to guarantee that the recipient receives blood free from spike proteins or mRNA.

"The blood banking domain is complex, highly regulated and associated with critical care of patients requiring immediate transfusions. No substance how strong the desire is, there is simply no realistic, feasible or applicable way to supply a supply of vaccine-free blood or barbed proteins," he wrote on Substack.

"We should be alert to different transfusion reactions and case descriptions that could show the transfer of mRNA in the future".

If you are looking for legal assistance, we invitation you to take advantage of our offer. In order to make a reservation for the consultation deadline, delight contact us by telephone: 579-636-527 or 22-266-86-18 or by emailing @: Contactlegartis.pl

If you think that our publications deserve support from employees who search hundreds of pages all day, you can support us by going to: Support Lega Artis

We reserve that we do not supply pro bono legal advice.