Jan Posamalski: all the “dogmas” adopted during the pandemic as a technological consensus proved to be false!

The fact that what is now called, in matters called climate change, a technological consensus, has been adopted and in a time of pandemic. I have repeatedly said that all the dogmas adopted as a consensus during the pandemic have proved to be false. First dogma: Covid is fatal and there is no cure. Second dogma: that the only salvation is non-pharmaceutical medical means, i.e. isolation, contact tracking, quarantine, social distance, helmets, masks, spraying everything with spirit, latex gloves, school closures, infirmary closures, closures, forest closures and cemeteries. The 3rd dogma: that the illness is not determined by the syndrome of symptoms – advanced fever, headache and weakness – but stick inserted into the nose, or test. And the 4th dogma: that salvation will be the universal immunization with an injection of mRNA created according to the fresh technology – says Jan Posamalski in a book conversation “It is worth playing clean”, led by Krystian Kratiuk.

Below, courtesy of Esprit Publishing House, we present a fragment of the book

***

KK: After being kicked out of TVP, do you inactive think it was worth talking about?

JP: Of course. In fact, I have strengthened my conviction.

Was it worth talking about even covid?

Especially that. It's 1 of the top generations of generations, and it's global. How could you not talk about him?

You're sticking to yours despite the way they treated you: they kicked you out of work and made a madman's patch?

It's not a madman, it's a shroud, it's a wrapper, it's a flatlander.

Do you meet the criteria for these colorful concepts?

Of course, especially flatlanders. This phrase is especially close to me, which you most likely remember as editor of PCh24.pl. due to the fact that I shared a communicative about him with the viewers of this portal. This happened after prof. Andrzej Horban utilized it in 1 of the texts to me.

And he didn't mean you... So remind me what it was like.

The prof. meant Dr. Vladimir Bodnar. Well, they got to us, the crew. It's worth talking about., information about a doctor who successfully handles the cough-19 virus, utilizing a simple anti-flue preparation from many years ago, produced in Hungary, where a vial of specified a refunded drug costs 10 zlotys. We heard it helps to make the most celebrated disease. I examined the subject with the aid of the people from Rzeszów, while in the meantime the doctor wrote to the ministry about his proposal to include amantadine, a drug produced in Hungary, sold under the name Viregyt K, in a national pandemic policy.

I invited Dr. Bodnar to the program. However, I besides wanted prof. Horban, a national consultant in the field of infectious diseases, then besides the chief advisor to the president of the Council of Ministers for COVID-19. He confirmed and asked what time and where he was to be. "Today I invitation you to Voronica at 10 p.m., we run at 25 p.m." “Okay” – I received an answer. However, I wanted to be fair, and I wrote that Dr. Włodzimierz Bodnar from Przemyśl and Minister Michał Dworczyk will execute on the program.

What was the answer?

Literally like this: “O k...and I fear that I will not.” So I immediately asked: “Why, Professor? Please, Minister Dworczyk I will give separately at the end, for 10 minutes.” Then the answer came: “This k... wasn’t about the minister, it was about the gentleman from Przemyśl. I have neither the desire nor the time to discuss with ...’. That's virtually how it sounds, look at the phone.

Indeed.

So I proceed to write: “Professor, it is worth talking about patients, whether they will succumb to myths, whether they will perceive to authority, please...”. The answer is coming: "Yes, but there is simply a limit, it is hard to discuss with flatlands (although they are right)".

What's that expected to mean?

Let everyone guess for themselves, prof. Horban never referred to this, even though I have already described this correspondence in the media.

But he came to the show.

He came, but alternatively of talking about Bodnar’s achievements, he tried to examine him, even from the Doctor’s Act. It was fatal, however, due to the fact that the program dealt with a substance of interest to everyone erstwhile we were dealing with a deadly disease, which was presented as something that has no cure and which is deadly on a mass scale: it was convinced that we were all about to die, and those who would not die going to Ladybug would stumble over dead bodies. If there's a trace, even an unproven signal that individual might have found a solution, then under average circumstances individual should spend any time talking to him, interviewing witnesses, patients, and so on. Nothing like this happened here. prof. Horban was not focused on any form of dialogue, agreement or questioning, he was not curious in what was going on. Besides, this essay allows you to conclude that he knew that amantadine was working.

It's hard to believe.

It was all the more hard for me to believe, especially since I later reached the documents, from which it is clear that prof. Horban had previously recommended amantadine as a great, effective drug against influenza kind A. So he knew precisely what was going on, he knew the measure.

In this context I confirm that I am a flatlander – since even prof. Horban admits that these mocked people trying to solve the COVID-19 problem were right. They maintained healthy scepticism, demanded debate, checked technological sources, not only the most widely cited ones: they had the courage to look elsewhere than scored periodicals.

So did discipline abdicate during the pandemic, since these people were despised as flatlanders, shrouds, and wrappers?

Nothing more wrong. After all, there was a group of honest, honest scientists who took the challenge and deconstructed this full authoritative pandemic narrative. There have been and there are besides journalists and politicians who inactive do not let go. I know that various countries besides have investigative committees, reports are being made. So discipline didn't abdicate, honest journalists didn't abdicate. Already after the pandemic, in September 2022, in Politico, which is not a plastic medium, the effects of a journalistic investigation carried out with the squad “Die Welt” were published. It has been shown that the WHO policy design, which has been implemented widely in all countries, was prepared not by employees, specialists or WHO experts, but by people from large NGOs who operate on the outskirts of the WHO. “ The top and most powerful was the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Next was Gavi, a global vaccination organization that Gates helped establish to inoculate people in low income countries, and Wellcome Trust, a British investigation foundation with a multi-billion-dollar fund that collaborated with Gates' foundation in erstwhile years. Finally: Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), an global investigation and improvement group dealing with vaccines that Gates and Wellcome helped make in 2017.’

These 4 NGOs, all strangely related to Bill Gates, without a democratic mandate, without any power of public control, have decided on what policy the WHO will implement against the new, dangerous virus and thus what policy it will impose on associate States. This communicative shows a deeper thing, that is, how the WHO works today: that it is an organization that deals not with the wellness of humanity, but with social change. It is only a pity that this "Politico" text was created so late.

Returning to the program with prof. Horban – it was not yet a program after which you were said goodbye.

Nope. But I already noticed any symptoms of danger. I mentioned that Minister Dworczyk, who I invited, besides appeared in the program due to the fact that I knew that he was working with large commitment to supply hospitals and another centres crucial in the pandemic of all supplies. He came scared; individual from our staff said that until the last minute in the hall, the studio was nervously receiving texts, talking in a quiet voice, acting truly very, very insecure.

And on the next day, on 15 December, a press conference was held by the Minister of Sunday, whose writer Polsatu asked about this amantadine. At that time, the Suniuszski wanted: yes, we made a decision, investigation will be conducted.

And they ran them?

We were looking into it with the program crew. It was a scandal. Protracting procedures, retaining investigation decisions in subsequent institutions – and this is in the bioethical commission, and this is in the Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Products and Biocidal Products. The investigation itself started with a immense delay, as already in May, erstwhile the winter wave of illness reached the lowest level – like the flu in May.

Moreover, I have learned that 1 of the hospitals that had the most experience in these hard cases of covid, or the infirmary of the Ministry of abroad Affairs, even though he signed a contract and was formally included in this study, never undertook it. The hospital's manager was not curious in this, or possibly she had a "prikaz" to not include herself in this research.

Do you know how many people have yet been tested?

I don't know, millions have been reportedly ill, so I guess 50,000?

Nope.

Five grand?

Nope. Seventy-eight people. The results were published by prof. Adam Barczyk of Katowice, of the advanced Silesian Medical Center. Amantadine was found not to work. I remember the triumphalist speech of Bartosz Chmielowc, the Patient Rights Ombudsman, who declared that there was no technological evidence to confirm the effectiveness of COVID-19 amantadine treatment – so it is not recommended in this case. In his tone, you could hear: see, all the foilers, the shrouds, we have hard evidence here. And it wasn't evidence.

At the same time, a second survey was conducted, by prof. Konrad Rejdak of Lublin. Despite the media campaign, after this memorable conference he managed to complete his research. prof. Rejdak had considerable experience in neurological diseases, as he runs a centre dealing with severe Parkinson's and akin cases. What did it turn out to be? Well, amantadine was known as a flu medicine 2 decades ago, after which abruptly a circumstantial name called Theraflu entered the marketplace and everyone started administering it. As with the contact of the magic wand – any mysterious forces or unusual historical determinism worked – amantadine ceased to be fashionable. Nevertheless, it was inactive commonly utilized in the neurological population as it was found to have a affirmative effect in patients with Parkinson's symptoms or patients with multiple sclerosis. prof. Rejdak, having respective twelve people in his ward with Parkinson's, who at the same time fell into covid, noted that patients who took amantadine were going through covid much softer and getting out faster. He considered this to be a strong indication that it was possible to save patients with COVID-19, and started to realize, in his own right, what he saw was effective. For many months he sought to launch professional research, and as shortly as this chance was announced, he volunteered to carry out the project. Regardless, Dr. Włodzimierz Bodnar besides sought investigation on amantadine hydrochloride and I know that he was in contact with prof. Barczyk and prof. Rejdak. Without going into details: after many months, prof. Barczyk of Katowice and prof. Rejdak of Lublin became in the square. Significantly, the Agency for Medical investigation did not wait to announce the results at the end of the survey in Lublin; as shortly as prof. Barczyk with his seventy-eight patients was ready in Katowice, a conference was organised in early February 2022. And then, as we know, Putin canceled the pandemic on February 24, and the case went silent.

Nevertheless, in Lublin, prof. Rejdak's squad continued to work and in August 2023 published results in the prestigious magazine "European diary of Neurology". Studies in a much larger group of patients have shown beneficial effects of amantadine.

That didn't convince prof. Horban, the head of the medical board at the premiere, either?

I don't know if it did. Even if he did, what does it substance now? prof. Rejdak's investigation was published a year and a half after the pandemic was cancelled. I presume prof. Horban and his full medical board know the conclusions of prof. Rejdak's research. Another question arises: What can we, as citizens, do? We have a situation erstwhile the head of the Medical Council at the Prime Minister acknowledged the correct doctor (a "flat earther" who is effectively treating amantadine) and at the same time the regulations of the ministry make it hard for Poles to access this medicine. In the meantime, thousands of people are dying, and at the end of the study, they confirm that the drug can be effective.

Isn't that for the D.A.'s office?

You said it...

But the pandemic was a global event. In Poland, Horban may have reached power, but there were Horbans of another countries – and I fishy they besides had cognition of the effectiveness of amantadine. What does that mean?

The fact that what is now called, in matters called climate change, a technological consensus, has been adopted and in a time of pandemic. I have repeatedly said that all the dogmas adopted as a consensus during the pandemic have proved to be false. First dogma: Covid is fatal and there is no cure. Second dogma: that the only salvation is non-pharmaceutical medical means, i.e. isolation, contact tracking, quarantine, social distance, helmets, masks, spraying everything with spirit, latex gloves, school closures, infirmary closures, closures, forest closures and cemeteries. The 3rd dogma: that the illness is not determined by the syndrome of symptoms – advanced fever, headache and weakness – but stick inserted into the nose, or test. And the 4th dogma: that salvation will be a common immunization with an injection of mRNA created according to fresh technology. Horban's counterparts in many countries did not truly want to question these revealed truths, although there were places in the planet where government representatives made independent decisions without dogmatically treating WHO recommendations (read: Bill Gates), for example many African countries, Sweden, Belarus, Florida. There were doctors everywhere who questioned all these dogmas.

But let's stay in our backyard. Dr. Basiukiewicz, for example, questioned amantadine, but he besides had a set of another medicines. prof. Frydrychowski recommended simple coal, only given in large quantities and immediately after the first symptoms of the disease. These doctors claimed that administration in the first days after the infection, whether amantadine or hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, or agents specified as carbon could inhibit the improvement of the virus, so that effective treatment was possible in the first phase.

You checked on yourself, didn't you?

Yeah. My daughter and my wife besides checked: we all treated with amantadine. Not to mention, my sixty-year-old disabled sister, who suffers from neurological diseases, after amantadine, and, attention, after infusing an intravenous vitamin cocktail came out of the illness almost a week later. I know quite a few specified cases, actually we could give them a separate book.

As well as a separate publication, people who died simply due to the fact that individual decided to close the country, causing pandemic psychosis. In the fall, I spoke with prof. Robert Gil, head of the guild of Polish cardiologists and cardiology department at the Ministry of abroad Affairs. Elite. I showed him a statistical survey showing that in 2019 his infirmary performed more than 3 1000 six 100 operations, and in 2020 only 1 5th of this. I said, “Doctor, what happened, why so little?” He said, "I don't know." I asked: “But what about these patients? abruptly they recovered, stopped getting sick, stopped having heart problems?’ And he said, "No, they haven't stopped getting sick, but they don't come forward." Well, they didn't volunteer due to the panic. And if sick people don't study and heal, they end up in a cemetery. We already in September 2020 with the editorial board It's worth talking about. We have reached outstanding Polish oncologists, including prof. Maciej Krzakowski – a national consultant in the field of oncology, prof. Andrzej Deptala, prof. Marek Wojtukiewicz, and they have all called for the immediate restoration of average procedures – diagnostics and oncological surgery. Lockdown and paralysis of the strategy blocked patients access to diagnostics and treatments, resulting in death sentences for many patients. You can never forget it.

Let's go back to the beginning of the pandemic. erstwhile did you start to realize something was wrong?

First of all, I got mad that we were blocked. Among the tv decisions related to the announcement of the pandemic, there were besides those about throwing out a full bunch of programs, due to the fact that they were... a threat. As the audience sits besides close, there is no social distance, we are incapable to keep the sanitary regime, which was then beginning to apply, or was actually imposed on us. present we know where he came from, that these guidelines were applied to us not by the Polish Ministry of Health, but by these Gavi, CEPI, Wellcome Trust and another subjects of Bill Gates.

Did you have a minute of fear? Most of us at first, in this completely fresh situation, got rather seriously scared.

Honestly, I don't remember being scared. I felt that my body was strong, I felt good, I thought I was a fit man, I was not afraid that I or individual in my household would die.

Didn't you get frightened by pictures from China and then Italy? celebrated trucks full of pawnshop coffins?

No, but I was very curious in this fresh sensational reality. Global experience involving millions of people was an different social event. I actually felt part of a global village.

I thought that in fact it was essential to defend myself: we started taking more vitamin D, I started utilizing a regular cold shower after a bath, which I inactive have today. all day I stand under ice water for at least 2 minutes, it's a kind of hardening. But by the fact that life stopped then, we decided to pray more. The church called for this, in the temples were sung or recited the sequences. Since the program was suspended, abruptly there was more time for activities another than professional ones, so we besides started going to Mass all day. due to the fact that for a moment, it was inactive slow...

Then, erstwhile we got home in the country, we took a priest with us, who had been with us always since. He got his area and introduced us to the customs of denying Liturgy hours - A regular brawler. It gave us a sense of the rhythm of the day, order and sense, and at the same time it strengthened us. That's why I think we managed to avoid fear. But I believed the plague was dangerous, and I waited for fear that people would begin to die massively.

Only they didn't die. And I learned about it a fewer weeks later erstwhile Virtual Poland reprinted an interview with the head of ceremony entrepreneurs, who complained that he would most likely go to Mateusz Morawiecki for a shield due to the fact that their income had fallen.

I remember that information, it impressed us all. How did you explain that? Like authoritative factors, the UN, Polish power and obedient media? That there must be less victims first, so there can be more?

At first, I thought possibly these bodies were being held somewhere in the freezers for safety or investigation reasons, but no. It turned out that just mortality was little than any another year during that period. That was the first time I thought something was wrong. So we started looking.

I got a sensational interview with prof. Wolfgang Wodrgy, an crucial German doctor and politician. I was very curious in his comments. In the meantime, I besides started to feel that it was any kind of service setup, an component of global gameplay: the United States, China, any Proxy war. akin reasoning people, these skeptics, with time there was more and more. Maciek Pawlicki published the text on the web, Witek Gadowski began to dig into the subject and cyclically evidence the columnons on his channel, Grzegorz Płaczek appeared, who on his Facebook profile pasted questions to the Ministry of wellness and the answers of the ministry, and Dr Mariusz Błochowiak released the first of the series, an highly interesting book False pandemic. At the same time, Dr. Zbigniew Martyka published his opinions on Facebook. The places from which information could be obtained were coming, hence, at the minute it was revealed that we could return to the program, and it was a holiday...

Because the virus began to be in reverse just before the presidential election.

Exactly. The case of Jolanta Gontarczyk, a.k.a. Lange, SB agent, co-responsible for the death of Fr. She was revealed as head of the Pro Humanum Foundation, which is the organization benefiting from the generous support of Rafał Trzaskowski, conducting a policy of promoting sexual minorities. We so decided that this would be an excuse to convince Jack Kurski that we should go back on air. To put it plainly, I suggested we make a program about it. In the context of the upcoming elections, the “hot” subject of Jolanta Lange and showing how Trzaskowski is backing from the city's erstwhile PRL agent of the service will be useful to everyone. He got convinced and we came back.

***

"It's worth playing clean", Jan Więpajalski, Krystian Kratiuk, Esprit 2024 Publishing House