It's good to be sovereign or at least sovereign

In the last image we even measurement sovereignty – they make us into a balloon, but we blow ourselves into this balloon.

________________

______________

The following text (regards what is above on the video) from: https://zbigniew1108.neon24.net/post/178119, want-to-unify-or-subordinate-other-people

______________

I doubted her.

Yesterday, at a gathering in Warsaw, respective twelve people listened to a monologue on an crucial subject for Poles.

The subject is promoted as “an innovation that will revolutionize global business”.

But he's not the subject of my record.
I spoke to representatives of patriotic and Christian communities in the Kuluaras.
Declaratively, they talk about the request to build a common organization of non-parliamentary activists.
It's beautiful and lofty until it comes into practice.
It's a cliché, but it's symbolic.
Despite the prior agreement of the gathering leader, it was not allowed to present a website, which aims, among others, to facilitate agreement over divisions.

A minor-can come up with any justification, even though the audience was clearly curious in details and rules of use...

But the small thing is no longer doubt- how do the proclaimers of “unification” want to do this “unification”?

We'll most likely never know from them.
We gotta solve the mystery ourselves.
Because the binder is to be a common “enemy”.
‘whose not with the meat shall sweep it away’
They outdo themselves in multiplying enemy names and embroidering them on the flags of “unification”.

Often, the enemy is just a belief of the leader of Satanism, globalisation, esbecision, communism, Fascism of Zionism, etc., etc., encoded in the DNA of another leaders.
Often it is primitive malice, envy, or another negative emotion.

There is simply a dominant desire to satisfy the ego, so the talk of "unification" is only social talk,
Because that's the way it works, due to the fact that it's in a good tone...
And in this storm in a glass of water, more specifically emotion, it sinks “unification”.

It's not an crucial meeting, it's talk in the crucibles and the behaviour of the organizers. Question: "How do those who do not want to talk, meet, consult with another social-political leaders want to unite?"

Zbigniew Jacniacki

_____________________

PS

My colleagues like to research America, and it doesn't substance that it's just 1 of them.

The discovery is always nice, and it besides delights – even a tiny success – that is, this discovery – due to the fact that in the end, any success is, although not the 1 that was expected to appear – ‘unification’ — It didn't come out, it didn't want to, the balloon broke, you'll gotta blow a fresh one. Well, it's like it always is, due to the fact that it can't come out otherwise.

The organizers of the event did not even want to show the link – https://narada-polakow.org/ – a new, online, independent political platform, which is expected to unite Poles and Slavs, and which Paul wanted to advertise at the end of the meeting.

With a dedication to colleagues

Hello, hello! Here a bird radio in a birch grove,
We're broadcasting from a bird country.
Please, everyone set the camera,
Because the birds flew to the council:

Dariusz Kosiur