The economical charlatanry and the resulting demolition yet emerges from 3 fundamental absurdities:
1. You can get something for nothing (increase from consumption, air credit, risk-free profit, "unconditional income" etc., etc.).
2. What 1 receives does not affect what 1 gives (rich "stand" to "sharing" with "poor", "global corporations" will not be lost on the protection of "home companies", "working class" should be controlled on the resources of "rentiers", etc., etc.).
3. In the end, it will always be "somewhat" ("syneren" can indefinitely be indebted, pyramids of "social insurance" will last until the day of the mythical "post-rare", any subsequent recession can be "printed" etc., etc.).
There is no specified economical confusion—from the ancient program of "bread and games", through socialisms and communisms of all authorship, to today's divination of "digital welfare state"—which, after draining multi-story sofismatics and exuberant populist slogans, would not come down to the above mentioned simple nonsense.
So whenever a business plan is encountered, a political slogan, or an ideological invention which, though to the least extent, has the meaning of specified absurdities, then, without wasting time on unnecessary deliberalization or polemics, it is essential to neutralise its influence as rapidly as possible. Only then can you be calmly aware that you contribute to the process, in which the regular actions of average people postpone the final degrengolade – and that, contrary to appearances, rather a lot.
Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski
