Magdalena Czyż wrote any column in Wyborcza, which became the subject of attacks, but besides of defence. She describes her student jumps there, that she supposedly had sex with a prof. and got an A, and with the another she didn't and got a 3 rating. This is empirical evidence of various specified theories that were disputed that they were unproven. There they are. We besides have a simplistic and Belarusian reaction, which in collision with facts is experiencing cognitive dissonance, which is later. As Dr. Bartosiak says, we have intellectual maps specified as this and not others. The explanation is as follows:
This account looks real and shows the fact that the value of a female is due to being a woman. You know, she's gonna make up and stuff. A man must become a man, due to the fact that exams must pass, can't be for sex, etc. The problem came along with the introduction of coeducation to universities, as women were not in universities, they were not molested there. We're not dealing with harassment here. This is the first constatuation:
N.B.: there is further appropriate vocabulary due to the fact that its failure to apply prevents a reliable description of reality
Insults, sir. It describes her wanting to do it alone, which breaks the current narrative. She wanted to make her life easier by giving teachers. They were attractive to her, which is consistent with the redpile model. They had the resources they needed at the time and impressed with the values they needed. And what is attractive to a female and what is hypergamy – you should learn specified things a long time ago. In any case, the phenomenon is known and real. They are described as an easy career path, available to women. He erstwhile spoke on the occasion of the well-known editor Sławomir Jastrzębowski, describing his professional experience.
Bialystrianism has a serious intellectual hanging here, due to the fact that a female cannot be guilty and must be the victim, and Does she explicitly compose that she was the 1 who ran for visitors to facilitate her life. specified a script is raised by realists and creates a rage of white-ricerry, cucconservatism and all femin. Instinctive beating of boobs on top and challenging behavior. And there's no romanticist relation here, just simple service and value for sex. So q-res. specified a female can, for example, at the same time live free in an apartment, rented in exchange for sex by any businessman. Talking about romanticist relationships here makes sense to avoid explicitly mentioning prostitution. And since women request attention, we have a sponsorship deadline. Theoretically, this self-defence female and Lepper put her here saying she was expected to work at the store?
We have 2 basic cases and a 3rd primary-indirect:
1. The female takes the initiative of spontaneous and deliberate fairy tales to have easier. Like the 1 who put out tits, sat in the first bench, etc., so as not to gotta survey for the exam. She did it completely voluntarily, and one more time I emphasize this voluntaryness due to the fact that it is not within the head of simplisticism. An uninvolved desire.
2. Academic lecturer forces a woman's threat, utilizing her position, the anticipation of being fired, etc. And so on.
3. Indirect situations, erstwhile it is known that individual likes a student there, but if a given does not want to.
And if it impresses with features of the dark triad it impresses and it is impressive.
Unambiguable situations are such: the actor tries to get active in the movie and gives d*py to the producer. She's forced to, but on the another hand, without sex, she wouldn't get the part, possibly not become a star. KFC would gotta work. And now she's a large victim, but careers and millions she won't give up.
The celebrated left-wing jutuber Krzysztof M Maj spoke here, proposing bizarre solutions. The case Is immediately associated with sexual harassment and romanticist relations, but romanticism was not there. Q-restwo regular, pardon, sponsorship. Why, then, does he propose to evidence exams as an antidote? It doesn't look like a student on the exam is offering sex for a rating, but before that, she's playing to get a benefit. As He describes it. He twists it mentally so as to apply the pattern of a violent dorm. This is what intellectual maps have.
Meanwhile, we've been dealing with a simple fraud. due to the fact that overrating sex is just a fraud. but possibly any sexology or something. And with the privilege of women, due to the fact that a man has to learn and this 1 is adequate to spread her legs.
In general, it's the surface. Are they mostly accurate, due to the fact that we have yet to take work for what women do. And introducing yourself as a victim. Let's take economical violence: erstwhile a man works and a female doesn't work and sits at home and takes care of the house, it's force against a female due to the fact that she's releasing her and there's a gold cage. And erstwhile a female works and a man sits at home, it's force against a female due to the fact that she has to share resources with a man. Ittp.
All in all: fraud, alpha-damaged widow, Belarusianism, and simpyism. Did she break out of the alleged women's Borg, not put herself as a victim of the prof. of philosophy, plus for her. I don't know adequate about the scandal at the Poznań art school.
And 1 more thing: I consider that mentioned in this broadcast of Stanowski's and Mazurka's origins are besides sophisticated in the context of their criticism expressed by KM Maj, so I omit the issue. It is not amazing to advance prostitution in Electoral. What kind of environment is this anyway? The knees, aren't they?
And who has a link to Red Jarzębowski's statement, in which he describes a female who behaves in a real way?
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
