How was that taxation in France

ekskursje.pl 9 years ago

"In France they introduced a 75% tax, but had to retreat from it, due to the fact that the richest French people were mass fled the country, and 1 well-known actor even renounced citizenship" – this erroneous version of events keeps appearing somewhere. I'm going to post 1 on my blog, and then I'm going to drop it due to the fact that nec Hercules v. bulshites.

Why is this version wrong? In short – due to the fact that this taxation from the top introduced as temporary. The pranks of Żerard Renowicz Diepardiev had no influence on this, as did the alleged “mass escape”.

Citizenship cannot simply be renounced. Rerard Żenowicz got utilized propagandaly to Putin and then returned. A simple idiot (not even useful).

A longer version requires knowing of the importance of presidential elections in French politics. They are more crucial than in the States, due to the fact that the powers of the French president are greater than the American ones.

The Constitution of the V Republic was written under de Gaulle. More specifically, de Gaulle wrote it under himself. That is why, in the event of a conflict between the president and Parliament, the president can simply arbitrarily dissolve Parliament and honour.

Hence the thought of the fresh “Resistance” by Łelbek, in which the election is won by the Muslim Brotherhood candidate. Theoretically, if this had happened, the muslim president could have turned France into his own.

In practice, the elections usually look like the winners of the first circular are the centroleft and centre-right candidates. extremist candidates in the first circular then have their 5 minutes, or alternatively 5 percent. In the second round, their support shifts to centre candidates.

In the fresh Łelbek to the second circular passes the utmost right and Muslim candidate, who in the second circular collects the voices of the center and left. Once, this strategy has actually amazed the French: the second circular went to the utmost right (Le Pen) and centre (Chirac).

Jospin, a socialist candidate, was close behind Le Pen. He ran out of little than 200,000 votes, and this lousy fraction of a percent made the French left gotta vote for Chirak in the second round. It's like I gotta vote for Kaczyński due to the fact that individual would go with him even more – for example Gierty or Czarzasty.

After this defeat, the centre decided to host American-style primary. And even an American-style twist happened, where 1 moral scandal can turn everything upside down.

A certain primary in 2011 was a politician idolized by the media, liked in the world, supported by business and welcome by organization camera. It was Dominique Strauss-Kahn.

However, this 1 went to fresh York's Sofitel for the weekend. As a result, Martine Aubry became the unexpected race leader.

Turning Polish politics into French realities, Aubry is the equivalent of the organization Together. She managed to carry out 2 reforms in line with the party's programme – introduced a 35-hour working week and the rule of universal healthcare regardless of insurance.

They didn't like her media and organization camera. After a tense search for Strauss-Kahn's successor, the camera put it on Hollande – a politician whose main advantage was authoritative insubordination.

To win the primaries, Hollande had to promise something to Aubra supporters. Among these promises was this taxation – but with the indication that it would be temporary.

Sam never wanted it. Hollande represents Strauss-Kahn's environment – people obscenely rich who would not even be able to store in a supermarket or behave in an economical class.

A friend of the neoliberal publicist to prove that this taxation triggered the escape of the wealthy cited an article from Forbes about a Belgian village full of French millionaires. but they've lived there before.
France is surrounded by specified taxation asylums on each side. Belgium, Luxembourg, Monaco and Andorra. And islands on the La Manche Channel for more.

Who could have run to them long ago? due to the fact that whether the top rate is 50% or 75%, it's better to have 0%.

But not everyone can. If it were that simple, the European football championship would only be between the representations of Andorra and Monaco.

In practice, it is sufficient, for example, to enforce from the payer submitting residence in Monaco the condition of proving that he actually spent 183 days of the accounting year there. For the time being, Poland is not even trying to effort the simplest methods of combating abuse, which have long been addressed by Germany or France.

Hence a naive imagination that “businesses will escape”. I wonder how these gyms imagine it – that TVN will decision along with the concession and Markus Tellenbach to movie telenovels in Cyprus? That president Filipiak will take Comarch to Andorra and inform the ZUS there? That Cezary Stypułkowski will decision Mbank to Monaco (it is simply a fact, a name already has) and will there implement his celebrated innovative commissions and fees tables?

That companies would decision from the Warsaw Stock Exchange to another one? And what about KGHM moving with the deposits?

So no, there was no "mass escape" in France that "forced withdrawal from this tax". This communicative is alternatively another argument for me against the general presidential election.

It doesn't make sense that so much depends on a series of coincidences, on pushing in the primaries, and then on whether the centreland gets a fewer percent more than the centre right (or vice versa). In the parliamentary system, it depends little on the case and more on the real distribution of preferences at the time of elections.

Read Entire Article