Today's decision State Election Commission fulfil all the characteristics of the offence in Article 231 k.k., which has late been making a real deal. It is not a function of the PKW, nor any another state institution, including courts, to measure and all the more to question the correctness of the appointment of judges and all the more to the home of ultimate Court. This is decided by the legislature, that is, Parliament and until the origin of the law is changed, by law, all courts, chambers of justice and appointed judges be as much as possible, and their rulings are recorded in the legal circulation, whether valid or not.
Any effort to undermine this most apparent legal order based on a three-way division of power is either a publicist or a violation of the law, depending on who and under what circumstances gives certain thesis. While in the press, radio, television, or the Internet, alleged legal authorities, politicians or journalists can pass on their “wisdoms” and rhetorical tupu booms; “neossies”, “Juli Przyłębska” Tribune, alleged public officials are not handsome and, moreover, are manifest violations of the law. Paweł Gieres, the author of the motion to postpone the gathering and resolution of the PCW until the strategy was organized, not only crossed the border of ridicule, but above all exceeded the limits of the law.
Identical allegations should be left to the 4 another members of the PCC who have supported this curiosity request and have so failed to fulfil their obligations and have exceeded their powers. The electoral code leaves no area for free explanation of a very simple provision. As shortly as Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs, acknowledges the complaint of the electoral committee, the PCW is to adopt a resolution on the adoption of the study or/or grant of the subsidy without delay. This did not happen and, in addition, not for nonsubjective reasons, but due to a gross violation by people who have legal education and thus committed a crime with full premeditation.
This is not the end, due to the fact that as PKW president Sylwester Marciniak rightly pointed out, the consequence of voting on an illegal proposal is legal paralysis. This is due to the fact that all PKW decision is upheld, and any in an instant mode. For example, if PKW does not agree to registry an election committee or a candidate, specified an entity is entitled to a complaint and the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs has only 2 days to recognise the complaint.
According to the electoral calendar, the presidential run is likely to officially launch on 15 January and thus registration of candidates along with committees. Of course, there is no chance that a fresh ultimate Court Act will be created in specified a short time and will go through the full legislative procedure. What does that mean? For example, the fact that Mr Paweł Gieres and his colleagues may refuse to registry the election committee of Karol Nawrocki and then neglect to admit the ruling of the Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber and postpone the committee's gathering again, pending a "systemic recovery of justice".
The question naturally arises as to whether the politicized members of the PCW will decide to carry out a de facto coup d'état, which involves much more serious allegations than provided for in Article 231 and unpredictable social reactions. To this day, it was hard to imagine that the PCW would not recognise the decision of the Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs Chamber, so it cannot be excluded that the same PKW would proceed to prevent the Charles Nawrock moving for presidential election.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
