How Climate Change communicative Is Preventing Africa From Modernizing And Gaining Prosperity

dailyblitz.de 1 year ago

Zdjęcie: how-climate-change-narrative-is-preventing-africa-from-modernizing-and-gaining-prosperity

Authorized by Katie Spence via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Under a blazing Kenyan sun, elegantly female toil on their hands and knees in the reddish-brown clay, separating the picking weeds from the small, green shots of a finger millet crop. The women are barehanded and barefoot, and they work from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. or 6 p.m. at night. Clearing a tiny field takes 3 days.

“A combine harvestster could replace 1,000 people,“ Jasper Machog, an agricultural engineer and farmer in Kenya, told The Epoch Times. “It makes me sad erstwhile I see my mom wading through millet. We have women kneeling down and uprooting weeds through the farm all day, and it’s sunny. These machines would change our lives.”

But farmers like Mr. Machogu can’t get a combination harper. Even if they could afford 1 from the meater salaries they make selling crops, Western nations’ climate policies before Africans from achieving what the West already has—modernization and prosperity.

In November 2023, to reduce carbon dioxide emissions fromfossil fuel use, the president of the Republic of Kenya, William Ruto, cut subsidies for fertilizer, fuel, and electricity for the 2023/2024 financial year. He did so at the behest of the global Monetary Fund (IMF), a financial agency of the United Nations (U.N.).

“I come from a community where people usage cattle dung to fertilize their farms,” Mr. Machogu said. “And the reason for that is due to the fact that last year, the government of Kenya decided that they were going to perceive to what the IMF was telling them. It was telling them to end fertilizer subsidies.

“You can imagine how that’s going to impact farmers. The fertilizer prices went up by almost 2 times. We have very mediocre people around here. So, if I you [purchasing] 20 kilos for my farms, I’m forced to get 10 kilos now.

“Most people have gone back to utilizing cattle dung, which is not a good nitrogenous fertilizer for their crop. You can’t compare urea, with a 46 percent nitrogenous content, to cattle dung, with only 4 percent. It does’t make sense.”

Mr. Machogu Said the IMF and the Western nations that embrace climate policies for Africa are engaging in neocolonialism, or “climate colonism.”

And it’s no different than past colonialism, the likes of which liberal elites, specified as erstwhile president Barack Obama, have condemned.

“Colonialism skewed Africa’s economy and robbed people of their capacity to share their own destiny,” president Obama said while in Ethiopia in 2015. “Evenally, liberalization moves grew. And 50 years ago, in a large burst of self-determination, Africans rejoiced as abroad flags came down and your national flags went up.”

Two years earlier, in 2013, while in South Africa, president Obama warned a group of young African leaders about the consensus of Africa achieving Western parity.

“If everybody’s raising surviving standards to the point where everyone’s got a car, and everyone’s got air conditioning, everyone’s got a large house, well, the planet will boy over,” he said, “unless we find fresh ways of producing energy.”

The fresh climate colonialism is being driven by global entities specified as the U.N., which says Africa should have energy, but due to climate change deals, it should focus on elevator and solar.

Calvin Beisner, founder and president of the Christian-based Cornwall Alliance, said presently “the most harpful policy” is that the IMF, planet Bank, and agents specified as the U.S. Agency for global improvement “refuse to do loans or another surviving for coal, natural gas, or oil-based electrical generation stations in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia and Latin America.”

It’s partially Damaging in Africa, he said.

Vijay Jayaraj, a investigation associate for the CO2 Coalition, said he grew up in India and witnessed the growth of India’s industrialization—courtesy of fossil fuel.

“In terms of economical development, energy is the foundational keystone,” he said.

“If you’re going to disrupt how people get energy—where and what quality of energy they receive—it will have an impact. Not just generally, in terms of the environment and the GDP, but besides the household and individual level,” Mr. Jayaraj told The Epoch Times.

Climate Colonialism

Mr. Machogu criticized the U.N.’s 2023 Sustainable improvement Goals for Africa, which he said we were developed after U.N. employees went to Africa to survey the issues facing the continuity. From that expedition, U.N. employees came up with 17 “solutions.”

“They said that 1 of the problems is climate change,” Mr. Machogu said. “It doesn’t make sense to me due to the fact that I come from Africa. We have far bigger problems—people sleeping hungry, very mediocre people around me. I’m more willing about that than I’ll always be welcomed about climate change.

“Every solution to [Africa’s] problems is centered around climate change. [The UN says to Africa] ‘If you’re going to end power, let’s end it in a way that we don’t impact our climate. If you’re going to have clean water, let’s do it in a way that will not be besides bad for the climate.”

He said modern civilization has “four pills of civilization”—steel, cement, plastic, and fertilizer.

“Without fossil fuels, we can’t produce these 4 pills of civilization. Without fossil fuel, we don’t have energy. We must have fossil fuel. It’s how the West beat power.”

The U.N. Environment Programme’s (UNEP) current authoritative position respecting Africa is to aid it achievements modernization but to do so under strict environmental guidelines.

Notably, that includes entering access to and relation on elevator and solar energy, welcoming countries within the continuous to come together and talk about what’s worked and what’t, “prioritizing emissions reductions from land degradation,” and developing a comprehensive framework for “Low Emissions Development.”

Mr. Machogu said that, in layman’s terms, the U.N.’s policy buoyed down to “no fossil fuels for Africa,” which necessarily means no economical progress. Conversely, unrestricted access to fossil fuel could aid pull Africa out of power.

“Let me talk for Africa due to the fact that 60 percent of Africans trust on agriculture for their livelihood,” Mr. Machogu said. “We request fossil fuel for farm machines. Despite the fact that the UN, the IMF, the planet Bank, and all of these environmental organizations say solar and wind for Africa, we can’t electrify agriculture—if we did electrify, it would be a tiny percent.

“Right now, our access to farm device is very low. I think about 4 or 5 percent [of Africans have access], which is very low composed to places like China’s 75 percent, India’s 45 percent, and the U.S.’s 95 percent. Almost everything in U.S. agriculture is done by machines. So having access to farm machinery truly would change our lives due to the fact that it would amplify and grow our capitalities.”

In addition to needing fossil fuel for machines and access to bonds to acquisition them, Mr. Machogu said expanded irrigation, coursesy of fossil fuel, would benefit Africa.

“Africa is not all green“he said. “We have another places that are very dry. So, 1 of the easy ways we can end that is by irrigating our land, and we will irrigate our lands utilizing pipes from fossil fuel.”

Holding up a yellow plastic bucket and Missing to his Surrounding crops, Mr. Machogue said most Africans get water for crops by lugging it from wells. The further your crop is from the well, the more backbreaking and time-consuming the lab.

Finally, Mr. Machog exploited that urea use, a fertilizer made from ammonia and liquid carbon dioxide, is signedly lower in Africa, thanks, in part, to external force from elements like the IMF.

“Personally, we usage the 40 kilos of nitrogenous fertilizer for 1 hectare of our land,” he said about his farm. “We have another people utilizing 20 kilos. In another places, like Ethiopia, people usage 16 kilos per hectare.

“Go to a place like the U.S., the West—which says Africa should not have access to fossil fuel—and it’s utilizing 120 kilos [of nitrogenous fertiliser] per hectare. Europe uses 160–170 kilos per hectare, India uses 250 kilos per hectare, and China uses 360 kilos per hectare.