A German-based American playwright, author and satirist CJ Hopkins found that drastic terms – for example, comparisons to Nazi totalitarianism – can only be applied to people and environments cursed by the leftist-liberal system. erstwhile criticism goes in the other direction, it will face itself the accusation, and judicially, of the “talk of hatred”.
"I am now officially, at least according to the German fresh Normal, a criminal spreading Hate speech. I am due to the fact that I compared German fresh Normality to Nazi Germany and challenged the authoritative communicative concerning covid, and I utilized the cover of my book for this," wrote the author, himself a leftist on September 30.
This was a ‘hot’ reaction following a judgement given on the same day by the Berlin Court of Appeal. He overturned Hopkins' acquittal and directed the case back to county.
In a broader commentary on this event, the author formulated 3 principles of German fresh Normality.
The first is that the NNN must not be compared to the Nazi state. “If you do, the German fresh average will punish you. He'll send the national Criminal Police on you. He'll study you to the national intelligence agency. I'll ban your books. She'll censor your tweets. She'll come after you based on fabricated charges. hate crimes“ Hopkins wrote on the basis of his own experiences.
In 2022 he tweeted a reproduction of his book cover. Her title and appearance referred to the celebrated monograph of the 3rd Reich. However, the swastika visible on the first was obscured with a covid mask. It's visible, but it's not apparent right away.
This publication on social media has become the basis for the investigation of an American. "German authorities chased me for it and convicted me. So now I am A hatred crime, anti-Semitic and the Holocaust bable“ He wrote in his comment.
"The 3rd regulation is that people who agree with the government and repeat its propaganda are not considered to be hate criminals“ Hopkins stressed. As evidence, he included examples of the usage by the left-liberal mainstream of accusations of Nazism, formulated against alleged populist parties, including Alternatives for Germany – AfD. specified terms came out, among others, from the keyboard of the Minister of wellness and the large-scale weekly "Der Spiegel".
Hopkins joined a part of press release from the appeal court that lifted the acquittal of the writer. A justice typical wrote: “Swastika, 1 of the main symbols of the banned National Socialist Workers organization (NSDAP), is only utilized here to express criticism of the national government's coronavirus policy; The posts in question do not show a clear separation from the ideals of national socialism. A comparison of coronavirus-related measures, as seen in the blocking of mouth and nose, with the Nazi panic government symbolized by swastika, is simply a trivialization of national socialism and the national socialist genocide of millions of Jews, but not its criticism.”
In a colorful description of his reflections from the courtroom, the author compared the hostile glances of 1 of the representatives of the 3rd Authority with the hateful eyesight that many passers-by during the Covid sanitary regime. Forced to put on a mask – for example, in order to store or settle a substance at the office – he wrote it Befehl ist Befehl! ("Order is an order!") – a clear allusion to the defence lines utilized by German criminals during Nuremberg trials.
Hopkins besides noted the favorable voices of alleged authors mainstreamum. Clivia von Dewitz, in the "Berliner Zeitung" newspaper, noted that "German judiciary one more time deviates from the principles of liberal democracy, which is developing through the exchange of conflicting beliefs and opinions, as well as criticisms of government activities".
‘If Der Spiegel and Stern have approval to usage swastikas on the covers of their magazines, the same freedom must apply to those who criticize the government. When, as in this case, the judiciary begins to apply double standards and condemns the apparent criticism of the government by utilizing Nazi symbols and conducts a trial in an unjustified anti-terrorism mode, 1 has to ask how far the German judiciary has gone from basic democratic principles," the writer added. She besides pointed out how absurd it is to say that the man who married the judaic female would “trivilize the Holocaust.”
With respect to the course of the trial, Hopkins expressed the belief that the verdict was pre-established, while the judicial staging had a clear purpose.
"I must give justice to the court and the prosecution for the drama they created. The intent of staging the public process in this way – what the prosecution demanded, and what is different at the appeal level – was not to pretend that justice was being done. It was a show of strength. Demonstration. The ritual of public humiliation. And, given everything, they staged it well," he wrote with any kind of appreciation.
The American announced an appeal to the ultimate Court.
“Well, at this point I have to. If I do not do so, the precedent that attempts to establish the German authorities of fresh average will be maintained and the right to freedom of speech in Germany will become nothing more than a sick fascist joke," he explained on his Hopkins blog.
Sources: exposure News, cjhopkins.substack.com
RoM
“The speech of hatred” is the precedence of power. The lawyer General and the police are converging under the protection of immigrants
"The speech of hatred" is coming. Donald Tusk about the Bodnar Act details
