The Polish People's organization regularly recalls that it is profoundly rooted in tradition. It's hard to disagree with that, but it's not a tradition of Witos, and it's going back to a time erstwhile the people in the village had much worse than now, and the large landowners that make up the elite of the country somewhat better. And it is this second social group that the contemporary PSL is looking at, skillfully drawing from it what (for Kosiniak-Kamisha organization members) is best.
In the 3rd Republic of Poland, you can no longer afford as much as in the 1st Republic of Poland, so the PSL cleverly lurked, pretending to be as modern peasants. The Peeselists have been friends with liberals for years, they usually usage large-town poland, and their 16th century views give a calm tone, making them appear as though they were moderate. In this way, they gained the favour of mainstream media, pushing the “black people” into the position of a full of far less archaic writers, who, however, are incapable to keep their tempers on the head, everywhere they see spies and traitors and endanger to prison all.
Despite this masquerade, PSL members sometimes discover any of their cards, so you can see not only what their goals are, but besides what they truly think. This is due to the modern imagination of a country that is simply a federation of various powerful rulers and influential interest groups, in which the state is an attraction or, at most, an instrument for the elite to enrich themselves.
I don't want to steal, but I have to
Marek Sawicki, who has been an MP of PSL for over 30 years, survived a very loud minute of sincerity. During these 3 decades, he has survived many battles, and now he has faced his opponents. Credit 0 %., which is the election promise of the KO, but the Ministry of improvement and Technology, which has been a farm of "people" since December last year, is liable for its implementation. Only the gentlemen in the property change. This coalition arrangement has made PSL treat Credit 0% as its own and supports it even more than KO. It is rather possible that KO has deliberately given up the PSL baton in this case, so that it is the people who take on mass criticism of the program supported by only liberals, developers and banks.
By pro-development housing policy Marek Sawicki in program PAP studio decided to attack the competitive task of the Left, assuming the construction of thousands of municipal housing units, with which Credit 0% will compete for the reserved money for housing next year in the budget. It will not be much, due to the fact that only PLN 4.2 billion, but since Poland 2050 has already won precisely the same amount (the planned simplification of the wellness contribution of entrepreneurs), the second faction of the 3rd Way would not like to be worse. They gotta bring something to their powers, too. The condition, however, is to task the Left and choice up the full pot.
Fighting for these 4 billion Sawicki did not even step back before exposing his view of the state. If it's public power to build housing, it'll bargain 20% anyway. She will gotta work with private contractors, and erstwhile the state mediates between private companies and citizens, “in general, individual on the way must bargain something”. Sawicki does not even nuance, there is no hazard here (for some, as you can see, more chance) – it is just a certainty. They gotta steal, so the planet is built.
It never occurred to the people that it would be possible to make certain that no 1 stole anything for a change. This would be completely incompatible with the political doctrine of PSL, in which advanced public officials simply by definition charge commissions. This is simply a job, a lion has a mane, a dog barks, and an authoritative takes 10-20 percent. It is so better to limit the activity of the state in order not to make undue temptations. Even Sawicki would have been pushed there and the mediocre man would have had to be reluctant to delete "the due official". Why do you want to put him in jail?
The guilty have nothing to fear.
According to the doctrine of alleged peoples, the right to commission is granted not only to masters in offices, but besides to powerful non-settling positions in the structure of national power. I am deliberately writing national alternatively than state ones, because, let us repeat, people look at Poland as a country just – that is, a loose federation of powerful and influential groups, in which informal relations and networks of contacts are more crucial than procedures and regulations.
Therefore, the current PSL farm, called the Ministry of underdevelopment and Technophobia by skeptics, has prepared a package of solutions deregulation, whose main nonsubjective is to make it easier for the powerful private sector to circumvent the non-life laws of the Polish state, which unnecessarily pretends to be modern. In the 16th century, there were so many, and who was harmed? But now that they're here, they request to get their teeth kicked out. For example, by making it hard for state institutions to control their application. The draft changes included, among another things, shortening the maximum control time for tiny companies to just 6 days. Furthermore, the controllers will gotta inform the entrepreneur in advance of the papers they will be curious in so that the controlled individual can prepare in advance.
The PSL besides has an offer for taxation avoidance. It intends to prevent administrative enforcement authorities (taxi, ZUS and local authorities) from interrupting the five-year limitation period for taxation arrears. Currently, after the execution of an effective enforcement measure, even if it does not lead to the execution of claims – for example, there will be no adequate amount on the account taken – a five-year limitation period is calculated from the beginning. After the deregulation improvement of the PSL, tax-evading entrepreneurs would at least be assured that, in the event of the execution title, they will gotta hide their assets for only 5 years and not 1 day longer. And what matters in business is predictability.
Non-omnipotent State
According to written political philosophy, the state is in the community an overriding being that deals with what it wants. Therefore, the Law and Justice Government was hyperactive in all fields and reformed even what had not to be moved. Most of them didn't finish or forget it, due to the fact that their overwhelmingly excessive optimism collided with reality, a large part they did incorrect or very wrong, but at least they didn't say it couldn't be done.
The political doctrine of PSL is the other – here the state should not interfere in any matters, due to the fact that it will surely spoil them. This is an approach from the I of the Polish Republic, in which the roaring and fewer public institutions served mainly to keep as specified order and to defend the interests of the powerful.
Mr Sawicki presented this beautifully in the discussion with PAP. According to the MP, the state cannot build apartments due to the fact that it has no construction companies. Local governments do not have them either, so municipal housing is just as damaged as an idea. If the Left's housing task passes, the state will gotta buy private companies' services. Then why? Let the private sector handle the full apartment, it's easier.
Sawicki, however, forgot that construction companies do not besides have the General Directorate of National Roads and Motorways, which not only manages high-speed roads, but besides builds them. After all, the main accomplishment of the PO-PSL government was the construction of motorways. The GDDKiA only organised the full process, ordering individual tasks in tenders. In precisely the same way, buildings with low rent apartments could be built by a alleged public developer. After all, GDDKiA is besides a de facto public developer, only from roads. Roads can be built like this, but apartments can't?
In addition, private developers besides usually do not have their own construction teams, and even if they do have some, to a limited degree – they gotta usage subcontractors anyway. Why can private developers carry out investments, frequently being only their organizer, by outsourcing work to external entities, but you no longer? There are no arguments to support Sawicki's theory. He is simply guided by the political doctrine of his group in which the state should hide so as not to interfere with the powerful and groups' influence in their local interests
If you think so carefully, Sawicki besides undermines the Polish wellness system. After all, it is besides based on non-public wellness care facilities (NZOZ), which are usually private companies from Fr. O. NFZ as the organizer of the process sets standards for the provision of services, signs contracts with mostly private contractors, and then pays them pre-established rates for the medical services performed. How would that be different from that of a public developer?
We have business in common.
People are looking at politics not as a way of transforming reality in a peculiar direction, but as on the level of fighting for the interests of their powerholders (electorate) and their own. Again, it is simply a concept from the I of the Polish Republic, where the MP was equipped with instructions and drove to the Sejm to fight very circumstantial cases – crucial for vouchers from his region. His views were irrelevant, he most likely didn't even have them. Therefore, the PSL environment will fight for Credit 0% or a simplification in the business wellness contribution, even if they were clearly proven to be harmful ideas. It doesn't matter, that's not why they push them. They have a occupation to do. Of course, we besides request to take care of our loved ones. What's incorrect with that? Should they be ashamed of taking care of their family?
"When the diary drew Pawlak out in 2009 that the head of the improvement Partnership Foundation (a hat over their companies and friends who lived with volunteer fire departments, whom Pawlak was and is president), he made his 71-year-old mother, the people converted it to glory. There's been quite a few translations about helping your own. That household is the most crucial thing. That close politicians gotta work somewhere, too. Another thing is that nepotism and humanity regulation in every, without exception, formation, but only the people make it clear, without hypocrisy. They made it their trademark. And they converted to value: they leave their own” – She wrote in 2015 Mira Suchodolska in the diary of the Legal Gazette.
In the same spirit, PSL conducts its organization policy. Here there is no area for any nose spins, all alliance comes into play – if not now, then someday. Launched before the 2019 elections, the Polish Coalition, whose sole aim was to guarantee that the people exceeded the electoral threshold, was a gathering of politicians of highly dubious quality. They had 1 advantage – they were rather recognizable, so they gave a chance to attract any group of electorate. From the list of PSL – due to the fact that Koalicja Polska was only a sign – Paweł Kukiz (then in the PiS club), Stanisław Tyszka (now Confederate), Michał Kamiński (once, among others, PiS, PJN and PO), Jarosław Sachajko (the most faithful kukizowiec) and Jacek Protasiewicz ( cast out of PO for damaging the image of the party, now known mainly for many social scandals).
Kukizowci PSL reportedly promised PLN 6 million for actions determined by Kukiz and partners. no of this happened, and Kukiz was said goodbye to PSL without regret. The grief he had was Kukiz himself, who stated"I got the impression that I was robbed by the PSL". So the kooks fulfilled the task, provided the voices needed to cross the threshold, and then they were disposed of not to talk about money.
Archaic conservatism of Peeselists is expressed not so much in their views – they have these as a cure and mainly in the sphere of sexuality. Their political philosophy, in which politics is – frequently informal – to deal with matters crucial to their supporting interest groups and their immediate surroundings, is the primary preserver. Also, the people's approach to state institutions is from a fewer centuries ago. Logically, in a associate State of the European Union in the 21st century, specified a organization should not be at all, but I would like to point out that before the next elections to the Sejm and the Senate, these clever people will come up with something again to get at all costs.
