We are told that this is all to defend vulnerable, disabled groups or children, but it is only about limiting our freedom of speech and the anticipation of opposition. If anyone has any further doubts as to why freedom of speech in the various countries of Europe is being restricted, they should read it.
New average Germany v CJ Hopkins — continued.
Thank you for reading Substack Jack! Subscribe for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
https://consentfactory.org/2024/10/05/fear-and-loathing-in-new-normal-germany/
CJ Hopkins
The first regulation of fresh German Normality is: do not compare fresh German Normality to Nazi Germany. If you do, the fresh average of Germany will punish you. He'll send the national Criminal Police on you. He'll study you to the national intelligence agency. I'll ban your books. She'll censor your tweets. She will prosecute you on fabricated charges of "hate crimes".
I know due to the fact that it happened to me. I broke the first regulation of fresh average Germany. I compared fresh average Germany to Nazi Germany. I did it with the cover of my book.
https://www.amazon.pl/Rise-New-Normal-Reich-2020-2021/dp/3982146429/
Yeah, it's a swastika on the cover. Swastika covered with a medical mask. I tweeted this graphic in 2022. The German authorities chased me for it and convicted me. So now I am “a hatred criminal”, “an anti-Semitic” and “a Holocaust Trivilizer”.
This is Germany's second regulation of fresh Normality. Never, always exposure a swastika. The swastika exposition is not “in OrdnungIt’s okay. ” The swastika exposition is completely “verbotenIt’s okay. ”
Unless you're the Minister of wellness in fresh average Germany and comparing your political opponents to the Nazis. Or unless you're a popular German star and you compare Russians and their followers to Nazis. Or unless you're the main magazine and comparing German populists [parliamentary organization AfD] to Nazis.
In that case, the swastika display is fine. And it is not “verbotenIt’s okay. ” And it is definitely not “a hatred crime”.
And that's the 3rd regulation of fresh German Normality. If you agree with the government, follow his orders and parrot his propaganda, you are not “a hatred criminal”. If you are government, like a real minister in government, like a wellness minister, you are definitely not a “hate criminal”. And if you are part of the propaganda apparatus of the government, you do not request to add that you are besides not a “hate criminal”.
However, if you criticize the government or compare it to Nazi Germany and do so by placing swastika behind the COVID mask on the cover of your book, then you are officially “a hatred criminal”, “anti-Semitic” and “a Holocaust trivialist”.
Here's how Das Kammergericht, Berlin court of higher instance or appeal court, explained this in his press release after repeal My acquittal by the territory Court:
"Swastika, 1 of the main symbols of the banned National Socialist Workers organization (NSDAP), is only utilized here to express criticism of the national government's coronavirus policy; In these posts, there is no clear departure from the ideals of national socialism. Comparison of coronavirus-related measures to be embodyed by mouth and nose blocking with the Nazi panic government symbolized by swastika is simply a trivialization of national socialism and national socialist genocide of millions of Jews, but not its criticism.”
I remember erstwhile the justice president read it in the courtroom. I remember this clearly, due to the fact that the justice on her right, an eyepiece with short, grey hair (see the image of the courtroom above), looked at me with frightening hatred. We got into a staring competition that yet won due to the fact that I couldn't take it for besides long. After a minute or 2 I began to have flashbacks of scenes with Pianists, a movie by Roman Polański, and the eyes of Germans wearing medical masks erstwhile they saw the protest message I wrote on the mask that I was forced to wear in grocery stores to buy food erstwhile implementing "New Normality" between 2020 and 2020. This protest message reads: “Befehl ist Befehl” which is more or little translated as “orders are orders” and was the infamous defence of the Nazis in Nuremberg (i.e. “I was simply following orders”). If you were never surrounded by crowds of Germans wearing medical masks who looked at you with boiling, completely freezing blood in your veins with hatred... well, I assure you, this is an extraordinary experience. I've experienced it all day for over 2 years.
I experienced it again in Das KammergerichtWhere my acquittal, from January, was lifted at the request of the Berlin D.A. Yeah, they can do that in fresh average Germany.
I'll spare you the procedural details, legal arguments and descriptions of the inept anti-terrorism safety protocols that Das Kammergericht He ordered me to implement it in my trial. If you want to read about it, Aya Velázquez discussed this in her last comprehensive report, and Dr. Clivia von Dewitz, a German justice and expert on the statutes prohibiting Nazi symbols, discussed legal issues in this article before and in this another article after The trial. I didn't translate this second article (like the first article), but here's a passage...
Thanks to this decision, the German judiciary is one more time moving distant from the principles of liberal democracy, which is developing through the exchange of conflicting beliefs and opinions, as well as criticism of government's actions. If Der Spiegel and Stern have approval to usage swastikas on the covers of their magazines, the same freedom must apply to those who criticize the government. When, as in this case, the judiciary begins to apply double standards and condemns the apparent criticism of the government by utilizing Nazi symbols and conducting a trial in inappropriate “anti-terrorism conditions”, 1 has to ask how far the German judiciary has departed from the basic democratic principles. In consequence to the court's ruling that specified positions are not covered by freedom of expression or freedom of art, what, if not, is freedom of expression or freedom of art? An American married by a judaic female is hard to accuse of “trivilizing national socialism” or “no explicit rejection of national socialism”
— Clivia von Dewitz, Berliner Zeitung
You can besides read Eugyppius, another German writing in English in The regular Skeptic either Boris Reitschuster , another German writing in German, or The Epoch Timesor this excellent article by Milosz Matuschekwhich focuses on legal arguments.
Or, if you like to perceive to the immense Goebbels keyboard instrument, which is most of the mainstream German press, and you can read German, you can read all about how rebellious and crazy I am in Der Tagesspiegel, Die Tageszeitung and Legal Tribune Online, a law journal. For any reason I can't understand, Der Spiegel He was alternatively restrained in his coverage. I'm certain it had nothing to do with the fact that they printed that large fat swastika on the cover.
It was rather amazing that the mainstream German press had appeared to study on the course of events, as they carefully ignored this story. They may have been contacted by the PR representatives of the court, or they may have just smelled blood in the water.
Anyway, atmosphere in area 145a Das Kammergericht She was dripping with sanctimonious fascist authority. From the very beginning, it was clear that the three-member panel of judges was there to teach the "no negative COVID" and remind the German public what happens erstwhile the fresh Normality principles in Germany are broken. The judges clearly decided to abdicate my acquittal, so the remainder was just a theatre that, in addition to the long arguments of my lawyer and My message to the court, consisted mainly of judges emanating overlord contempt and boiling hostility to us from the jury like Gil's giant three-headed monster. The prosecutor mumbled 2 or 3 sentences with a monotonous voice at the beginning of the trial. She did not bother to effort to present a real legal argument due to the fact that it would ruin the effect fait-accompli mise-en-scèneWhich they evidently sought.
I gotta give justice to the court and the prosecution for their playwright. The intent of staging a public trial, specified as this 1 — as the prosecutors demanded, which is different at the appeal level — was not to pretend that justice was being done. It was a show of strength. Demonstration. The ritual of public humiliation. And, given everything, they staged it well.
It's embarrassing, but the fact is, they got me. At 1 point in these bizarre events, I began to experience waves of disturbing flashbacks from 2020-2022, erstwhile it was the hate-hating fresh Yorkers who chased maskless passengers on regional trains, like people-travelers in Invasions of body snatchers, and bandits' troops (German police) brutally treated anyone who protested against the "measures against coronavirus", and government leaders, state and corporate media, and the vast majority of German masses fanatically persecuted the "unvaccinated" with enthusiasm that had not been seen since the bad times.
These flashbacks looked something like this...
...so I was a small confused erstwhile I left the courthouse.
It took me a fewer days, but I'm almost there. After consulting my fearless lawyer, I decided to mention my case to BundesverfassungsgerichtI mean, the German ultimate Court, because... well, right now I have to. If I do not do so, the precedent that attempts to establish the German authorities of fresh average will be maintained and the right to freedom of speech in Germany will become nothing more than a sick fascist joke.
And so this law is guaranteed in Grundgesetz (i.e. the German Constitution). This is not precisely the First Amendment, but it is good adequate for Germany, and I am not going to let it be distorted and ridiculed by a group of fascists, not without a fight.
If you want to aid me in this fight, which will cost about EUR 12,000 in legal fees, plus any expenses I incur along the way, you can support my renewed "Legal Defence Fund". If you do this, take the subject down.
My sincere gratitude to all who have already contributed! Your commitment and generosity have one more time overwhelmed me. I didn't want this fight, but it should be fought now. If it were just me, it wouldn't substance that much, but it's not just me, it's very important. It is simply a conflict that takes place throughout the West, not only in Germany and the US, the United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia, but everywhere where people are fighting for the defence of constitutional rights and democratic principles.
I don't know if I'm gonna win my fight, but I know we're gonna win a bigger fight. As I said in my message to the court, totalitarianism, fascism, they never win. Not in the long run. past teaches us that. And past will justice us all at the end.
## [Singing]
CJ Hopkins
5 October 2024.
Photo by Erik Rusch/Epoch Times
# # # # # # # # # #
The erstwhile part with the message made before the court is here:
Guilty
And what, do you inactive think that we live in the best system, in a large happy household of members of the European Union, where freedom of speech, regulation of law and so on? Do you think that covid-1984 coronasism was just a momentary bad dream, various bureaucratic “climate” directives and restrictions are aimed solely at rescuing perishes...
