In a situation of endless wars, debt ceiling, sanctions and economical blockades, as has been the case in history, societies frequently gotta choose not the "best" state, strategy and ally for moral and emotional purposes, but from the "lesser evil" point of view to last and possibly even regain developmental dynamics.
And this situation is presently working in favour of Russia and its allies or protectors.
"Or barbarism or socialism"
In a situation where capitalism at the imperialist phase has reached the maximum level of planet concentration of property and monopoly today, this strategy has become mostly barren in terms of production and social, political, ideological and cultural creation, which drives it towards the production of arms and wars at all costs as an escape forward. This explains that “the utmost centre”, which has taken over politically most countries since the end of the Cold War, created conditions for the improvement of various forms of neo-fascism, more severe al-Qaeda or “batalion” “Azow”, “Kraken”, etc., or milder in the form of a organization Giorgi Meloni is Marine Le Pen. We are even more present present than in 1914 at the phase of history, where we can callback the dilemma formulated by Rose of Luxembourg "or barbarism or socialism."
Alterglobalism as “left” globalisation
Today it is simply a global economy de facto collects the means of production as a consequence of the process of concentration of ownership. We are so dealing with something akin to the codified production with further privatisation of profits and property in the hands of an expanding number of people belonging to the bourgeois families of planet oligarchs. Hence, further logical evolution – the request to fight for democratization of profits and property so that production and profits and ownership structure are consistent. So democracy bottom-up by producers and nations as part of multipolarity. Countries that have not given up the teachings of socialism have in this situation the leadership most aware of these realities and processes. However, pragmatism plus religion even the Iranian elite besides leads them to rational analysis of the geoeconomics of the world. The fight against globalisation (also in the form of “left alterglobalism”) is the fight for actual fresh internationalism, that is, the fight for the cooperation of free, equal and sovereign nations that care about the improvement of the territory in which they live in cooperation with all another nations of the world.
Different traditions, different systems
Among the counter-hegemonic countries are countries which, depending on the tastes of individual people, cultures or social strata, have systems that seem appropriate to them, but besides countries whose systems seem much little sympathetic to us. It's not the most crucial thing. In accordance with the regulation of lesser evil, and so the conflict for peace at all costs and respect for the inviolable rule of self-determination of nations regardless of culture, any "colour revolution" or any war to strengthen the monopolar camp, exploitation and inequality of the world, is inactive the worst script for this country, and thus indirectly besides for all another nations of the world.
Clear choice
Of course, 1 would dream of a world-wide strategy of freedom for all, equality between all and the brotherhood of all, so that it would be realized here and now promised Bible times “when lamb sleeps with wolf”, but we are not at this phase of history, so we are faced with a choice that can be formulated in this way: are we on the side of a single-polar bloc that conducts a policy of utmost inequality between countries, nations, classes that conducts a systematic policy of blockades and sanctions, a policy of regular provocation and stimulation of war moods around the world, and provokes to endless wars; do we prefer, vice versa, to stand on the side of countries, nations and movements, whatever kind of strategy and what ideology that defends its economy against imposing external conditions blocking their own economic, cultural, ideological, technological and artistic development?
Following History
Today in the planet we are dealing with about 40 wars, known as in Ukraine or Gaza, or little known as in Congo or Sudan or Yemen. The threads of all these wars always lead towards not so much the White House, not the Pentagon even, not the CIA, not NATO either, but towards Wall Street, where the decisions of all the above mentioned institutions are objectively supervised. In this game, Putinowska Russia opens, wanting to, in the eyes of most nations and countries of the world, a better possible of weakening the monopolar block than the supporters of Kiev or Tel Aviv. The question of "good" or "bad" is not to be considered here. Importantly, the fact that Russia, despite maintaining a strong position in the country of a network of capitalist-oligarch-related capitalists associated with the global economy (it is besides heavy dependent on webs of influence), is forced, whether it wants or not, to support, frequently in an opportunistic way, the national liberation movements in Africa, Asia, Latin America. For this reason, the Russians are able to conduct a more intelligent, more rational and more predictable analysis of planet relations. Not so much due to the fact that Putin is simply a smarter man than Vladimir Zelenski is Andrzej Duda, Donald Tusk is Emmanuel Macron, not to mention Joe Biden or Ursuli von der Leyen, but due to the fact that the economical situation of the Kremlin and its surroundings allows them to usage their brains more frequently than in the case of his mentally qualified opponents, forced not only to censor thinking, but to self-censorship, due to the fact that they are at the head of a political bloc that provokes to idleness due to the level of systemic sclerosis that he reached in the last 30 years. The remainder of the planet has noted this and this explains the evolution of the existing pillars of the single-polar block specified as the United arabian Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Ethiopia, Senegal, Colombia, Pakistan, Georgia, Hungary, Indonesia, Honduras, Thailand and much more. Their evolutions come not from the visions of any local duck, but from a rational analysis by many local ducks of nonsubjective trends in the world. So it's time to get noticed, as long as it's time, this trial over the Vistula and the Dnieprem, due to the fact that as he wrote, Mikhail Gorbachev to the then management of the GDR in the book of commemorative celebrations of the 40th anniversary of that country “He who lags behind past is punished by life”. Then, in 1989, the train of past was moving towards the West, but present it changed course, which Gorbachev was no longer able to predict.
Dark peripheries
Here we have attempted a brief technological analysis of the planet situation at this phase of history. Analysis, with which many supporters and members of the Western bloc's elite agree privately. They know what they're facing, they know what kind of business they're defending. But they besides know what is the nonsubjective situation that their countries and their strategy can defy to a lesser extent. That's why young people from the U.S. elite teach at the top universities, among others. Karl Marx is Antonio Gramsci or, from another yard, Ernst Jünger, at a time erstwhile specified discipline is almost forbidden and ridiculed in Europe, and even more so in even more peripheral Poland or Ukraine. Lokaj and the nations brought to their place by the leaders of the “free world” to date are to be dull and overwhelmed by fear, consumerism, sex and corruption! Hence with people with conservative views like Henry Kissinger, John Mearsheimer, Viktor Orbán, Jeffrey Sachs, James Galbraith, Scott Ritter, it is possible to talk rationally due to the fact that they are not haunted ideologists of “the only right right” for ever. Conservativeism should not be mixed with neoconservativeism, as liberalism should not be confused with neoliberalism.
Time to ask questions
Only erstwhile specified reasoning goes to the technological elites over the Vistula River and over the Dnieprem will there be a leap of civilization, but until it is – the road will inactive be open to intellectual regression and to economic, social, human catastrophe. What happens in Russia? Sooner or later, the Russians will besides gotta make a hard strategical choice not only for the "Western partners", but for the social strategy they imported. A situation where 1 cannot escape the fundamental question about the structure of the means of production and exchange, but where questions are besides raised, which were not answered very thoroughly in the times of the USSR – about civilizational and spiritual goals of life on Earth.
Global governments balance
Critics of this article will say that we stand in the position of "troll Putin", Iran, China or another "authoritarian regimes". Meanwhile, we request that first the supporters of "universal and global marketplace democracy" balance the last 4 decades erstwhile they were without a rival on a global scale. Let them look around each another and see the number of homeless people, unemployed people, without life prospects – in countries where there was a minimum of prosperity for everyone. erstwhile the “fear of a Bolshevik with a knife in his teeth” forced capitalists to submit, to creative thinking, and to class compromises. In the West, in countries where Francis Fukuyama After 1989, he formulated his thesis on the "end of history" as part of neoliberalism, the "new 3rd world" was well installed, which proves that the reigning capitalist, neoliberal, neoconservative, monopolar strategy is no longer able to offer anything credible to the vast majority of humanity. And that, no substance what we think of faults, mistakes or even crimes, is not the responsibility of Putin, Chinese, Iranians, Palestinians, Congolese, Syrians or Cubans. Here the responsibility lies mainly in our “camp” alternatively than in the real or imaginary “external enemies” of this strategy in a civilization crisis.
Prof. Bruno Drwęski
