Recently I have made 2 texts in which I tried to take seriously the past and future possible economical accomplishments and intentions of Donald Tusk [1,2].
After all, he claims to take over power again in Poland and so it is frequently worth not treating him as a "carrying clown" who brings dozens of coaches from all over Poland to his audience for their first performances. At least I thought so and... I thought so!!!
For as Poles we cannot treat him with ridicule and ridicule "a wink of an eye"Because he even prefers that many of us see him that way, and truly that circus clown and the following portrayed clown is not, and he never was.
]]>
]]>
]]>Source: ]]>https://twitter.com/saas57/status/1554880619305472005]]>
So who's D. Tusk?
First of all, he is an apologist and fascinated by Germany and German politics, which immediately puts him in a number of anti-polacks.
"Für Deutschland" (literally "For Germany"):
In addition, D. Tusk identifies himself as Kashub, although in his childhood he was spoken primarily in German. His parent and grandma on the side of his parent (German Anna Liebke) wanted to live in Germany after the war, but yet the household remained in Gdańsk and any of her had to learn Polish and his grandpa served in Wermachta during the Second WW.
By the way. If a judaic Talmudic nomenclature was used, in which only a descendant of the parent line is considered a native Jew, then for the Jews D. Tusk is just German.
Hence, his words "Poland is an abnormality", which were spoken in the monthly "Znak" in November 1987. True, the word itself is quoted as being taken out of context and even J. Kaczyński draws attention to this fact by defending D. Tusk, but in my opinion, since the uprising for German money of the Liberal-Democratic legislature (KLD) headed by D. Tusk, these earlier words have actually begun to give a later attitude to Poland [3]. And at the same gathering with the voters in which J. Kaczyński defended D. Tusk from selectively quoting his 1987 words, he yet stated that: "We have a German organization in Poland and this choice, which is ahead of us, is simply a choice: a Polish organization or a German organization and its allies, who are ready to wave their hand at everything to get to this parliament" [3.4].
Is D. Tusk emotionally disturbed? I don't truly know that, but by observing the verbal and nonverbal actions of D. Tusk it is indeed possible to get the impression that something is incorrect with his personality. An interesting assessment by Janusz Palikot [5] is by D. Tusk.
I subjectively view him as a man characterized by egocentroism* and idiolatria**, which may indicate any kind of personality disorder. But what am I to think... let experts speak, even specified as the court doctor of the PO - Bogdan Klich!
Well, but D. Tusk is not only pro-German, but besides pro-Russian, as she showed the first part of the series "Reset" and surely in the second part of this series it will be even more visible.
So besides Berlin and Brussels respect D. Tusk as their man in Warsaw, but besides Moscow and Minsk consider the same. In general, it can be concluded that D. Tusk is simply a typical of the German-Russian condominium in Poland. And this historically must give us any kind of fear of this man and, furthermore, for almost 8 years he had the chance to show himself negatively as Prime Minister of the PO-PSL government. His regulation is thousands of scandals and bringing Poland to "States of dictation"Where they were only "ch...j, du...a and stones poop" [6].
D. Tusk was sent to Poland by Germany with 1 task: to overthrow current governments. And he's doing everything he can to accomplish this mission. And at any cost, even through emotional and cynical quarreling of Poles or the "use" of notorious lies and half-truths.
In fresh days, many people have been shocked by the alliance of D. Tusk and M. Kołodziejczak from AgroUnion. I was surprised, too, but...
M. Kołodziejczak is as powerful as D. Tusk, and we know that "her pulls to her". The brotherhood of souls and personalities is possibly the best explanation for why D. Tusk opened his arms and accepted it - subjectively according to me - a petty "screamer". There's besides a hope at D. Tusk's that the fresh partner will get any votes in the country. And I'm certain D. Tusk besides feels satisfaction that - in his imagination - he took revenge on the PSL, who did not want a single list of full opposition, which was pushed by the infallible and divine "Sun of Peru"! And unfortunately, D. Tusk is simply a very vindictive man, which he could most likely tell specified Grzegorz Schetyna, although he is besides very vindictive.
Only that the above reasons for "development" by D. Tusk M. I don't think they're the only ones.
Yes, it may be that intraparty polling is very mediocre for KO (PO) and with this desperation D. Tusk is already grasping at everything to at least increase his support. surely there is besides a circumstantial personality "chemistry" between PO leaders and AgroUnion. any people are besides right about the causes of this alliance in the area of individual revenge by D. Tusk on the PSL.
But M. Kołodziejczak was previously known as a sharp PO and D. Tusk critic. In June that year he said: "If individual does not remember how to live for the Civic Platform and that Donald Tusk has moved Poles back respective centuries, he has made us a nomadic country, that people had to leave Poland for large Britain and Ireland, well, bravo, let him want to return the same".
At the same time, he was besides negative about the Law and Justice. He besides verbally and extraverbally presented himself as an opponent of our alliance with the US and praised Russia [7].He stated, among others, that “each of us should dare to do so and show the ‘fuck’ to the Americans”. In addition, he trampled on the EU's "flag" claiming that "This is not our flag."
So what were the views of the head of AgroUnion that led D. Tusk to choose to exposure its members on the KO (PO) electoral lists? What behaviors and verbal messages by M. Kołodziejczak convinced the PO chief to hazard putting him on their electoral lists?
I don't know that. Why don't any KO (PO) supporter explain it to me?
[3]"The Liberal-Democratic legislature was financed by the German chadezia, says Paweł Piskorski (...) Piskorski assures that he does not intend to harm any party, but simply presents a reliable historical account at the beginning of the 1990s in Poland. IAR says it wasn't a violation of the law, but something that happened 20 years ago in different political environments. Piskorski was the secretary-general of the KLD, whose speech was given by politicians from Pomerania: Donald Tusk, Janusz Lewandowski and Jacek Merkel. Piskorski - erstwhile secretary-general of the Liberal-Democratic legislature claims that the founded and led by Tusk legislature was financed by chadeks from the German CDU in the early 1990s. As he maintains, these were issues discussed between Helmut Kohl and Jan Krzysztof Bielecki - then Prime Minister and 1 of the leaders of the KLD". His words were never challenged to court as false. See: ]]>https://www.gasetarawna.pl/news/articles/793511,German-funded-cld-partie-donalda-tuska.html]]>
]]>abnormality]]>
[4] In November 1987, Tusk asked how "to free ourselves from these stereotypes that accompany us almost from birth, reinforced by literature, history, universal resentations? What will be left of Poland erstwhile we subtract from it all this lofty-ponuro-funny theatre of unfulfilled dreams and unwarranted swarms? Polishness is an abnormality – specified association imposes on me with painful persistence, whenever I contact this unwanted subject" - wrote the later chief of government. D. Tusk in the article added that Polishness evokes in him "invariably the reflex of rebellion". "History, geography, luck of past and God knows what else they have put on my shoulder a burden that I have no peculiar desire to bear, and I can't throw distant (I don't want to?), they burned the mark; and they make me carry it proudly" - wrote Donald Tusk ending the text with words: "I justice – so in Polish, pathetically that Polishness, regardless of its burdensome heritage and tragic associations, remains our common conscious choice". See: ]]>https://www.rp.pl/politics/art37245881-kaczynski-bronska-tuska-in-case-slow-polskosc-to-innormality]]>
[5] It is worth quoting here fragments of the communicative about D. Tusk by J. Palikota in the book: "Kulisy Platforma" . Although this book was published in 2011, it seems that D. Tusk's negative qualities only deepen as time passes.
]]>
]]>
]]>Donald Tusk (photo PAP/Radek Pietruszka) - after the publication of "Newsweek" about the eavesdrop.
And what was it about D. Tusk that J. Palikot, who spent six years in the PO, met her leaders, her actual goals and hidden secrets?
Ano J. Palikot describes Donald Tusk as a ruthless and perfectly controlling man of his aggression.
For example, the scene he witnessed erstwhile he visited Tusk in his office in May 2010 is to prove: "I go in and I see Donald in 1 of his large dark blue suits, in good leather shoes - they looked like Ermenegilda Zegna. His leg was based on football. [...] He looked at me and encouraged me: Come in, come in. Then he says, "Do you see that plant in the corner? erstwhile I moved here, I was visited by Leszek Miller. He said his wife gave it to him, and he asked me to take care of it and water it. After these words, he kicked the ball hard adequate towards that plant. The ball bounced off her and then off the desk and the TV." And then there was another beheaded ball in that plant. He hit something that belonged to Miller, who was genuinely fascinated." “ It was a real Tusk, ” Palikot concludes. – "a mixture of nihilism and cynicism, and on the another hand a certain charm, charm."
J. Palikot does not hide that D. Tusk “has his charm” but besides met his other, “party, even rude” faces: “I saw from the beginning that he treated all the members of this manor like ravens. Knury – is the word he utilized most often. Gregory [Schetin] was no exception here. And he humiliated him. And he sometimes portrayed him as specified a boar with no manners, who only needs to eat, drink and munch his tongue.”.
According to Palikot Tusk is "a terrible cheapness" which "counts all penny". And he doesn't remember “no occasions, no names, no anniversary of their friends and friends. but for the names of Grzegorz Schetyna. He actually got erstwhile from Donald a copy of the swords as a name gift. But that happened erstwhile he was Prime Minister. So the gift came from the graduation.”
Tusk is like a child, a woman, a Russian and a Greek tyrant... Palikot besides claims that Donald Tusk sometimes lacks manhood and sometimes acts like a child. "She is very feminine in the way she walks, in relationships with people. On the another hand, it has something of the character of Russians, who mostly bring a man into the atmosphere of relationship for a very long time, fraternizing to abruptly cut through it absolutely at any point.”
Apart from the fact that there is (or happens to be) something of a child, a female and a Russian in the premiere, he besides happens to act like heroes of his favourite reading. What books are we talking about? According to Palikot, it is about the stories of the tiny Greek tyrants of Socrates or Herodotus, who “had a custom, for example, to execution all their sons immediately after birth. Each of these heroes was snorting in cruelty.”
Tusk seen through Palikot's eyes is an highly impulsive, explosive, aggressive, violent, but besides "shaky", mentally weak, hysterical and easy depressed politician: "When he attacks, his face becomes fierce, he throws profanity, insults and throws everyone away. "I absolutely fuck you all. You're no good for anything. I've had enough!” – these are specified lyrics”.
According to Palikot’s characteristics, Tusk pays large attention to the costume, appreciates good wine. Unlike Schetina or Drzewiecki, with whom 1 can only go for vodka, or whisky), he smokes cigars, hates clergy, and Catholicism is simply a origin of political gain for him ("The best of everything was consent to this wedding before the 2005 presidential election. Here I abruptly learned that the election staff had come to the conclusion that there had to be a matrimony between Margaret and Donald).
Palikot admits that he has never straight spoken to Jarosław Kaczyński (Sometimes I shouted at him in the Sejm Hall, and he answered), but if he had the opportunity, he would ask him, “Does he not feel like going to Barbara Blida's grave and crying?”
Palikot believes that Tusk truly considers Kaczyński to be a “monster” and that he most frequently describes him. The war between Tusk and Kaczyński, however, is above all “the theatre on which the media are fooled” due to the fact that “against appearances [both] go a small akin way, the way to calculate everything and everyone.” "He has lost his way," he concludes.
[6] ]]>https://bliskopolski.pl/iii-rp/afers/]]> ; ]]>http://www.srich-platform.org/]]>
[7] ]]>https://twitter.com/i/status/1693174436067700878]]>; ]]>https://twitter.com/i/status/1496462448605466626]]>
*egocentroism - this is my word - neologism - designed to find the phenomena of simultaneous occurrence: egotism, egocentroism, and cynicism filled with foggy egotism,
** idiolatria - an attitude consisting of self- worship, deficiency of any criticism for its own actions or weaknesses, derivative of megalomania and mitomania.
Leave behind the good, love and wisdom...
© Krzysztof Jaworucki (krzysztofjaw)
kjahog@gmail.com
