The Tusk Coalition is gradually weakening. As a result, more and more absurd and illegal political advances are being caught. As part of the fresh dissmocratic push, the talker of the Sejm Vladimir Czarzasty, whose actions and announcements give emergence to serious controversy, both in the context of constitutional competences and in the direction of systemic changes.
Black man wants to overthrow the president and ban Poland from leaving the EU. 1 of the main points of inflammation is the issue of swearing in fresh judges of the Constitutional Court. In accordance with the current legal order resulting from the Constitution of Poland, the pledge of fresh judges of the Constitutional Tribunal is accepted by the President. Meanwhile, the Tusk government, in agreement with Communist Vladimir Czarzasty, began to implement the alleged "Plan B", which provided for the anticipation of conducting this procedure without the head of state. The oath of the judges is to accept the Marshal of the Sejm.
According to media reports, specified solutions are severely criticised by the environment of president Karol Nawrocki as being without legal basis and violating the constitutional order of the state. In practice, this would mean an effort to circumvent presidential prerogatives by a majority of Parliament, leading to a question of the limits of the authority of the talker of the Sejm and Parliament itself. In this context, the Black One's actions are interpreted as an effort to effectively presume the powers of the head of state, at least in the functioning of the Constitutional Court.
Parallel leader of the Post-communist Left announces a legislative initiative to make it hard for Poland to leave the European Union. According to policy statements, the introduction of mechanisms requiring a referendum or a more complex procedure than a specified parliamentary majority is being considered. Black argues that this is simply a consequence to the increasing hazard of Poland leaving the EU.
There are indeed voices in the public debate about the "real threat of PolExit", raised by representatives of the government among others. However, the opponents of this concept point out that an effort to legally "protect" EU membership may lead to a simplification in the sovereignty of future parliamentary majority and citizens.
The most controversial aspect of this debate concerns historical comparisons. Critics of the Left initiatives combine them with an effort to enter a "eternal alliance" with the russian Union into the constitution of the Polish People's Republic – a evidence which was to cement the geopolitical addiction of Poland. This analogy is correct – the current situation of Poland in the European Union is now akin to the PRL-ZSRS relations. While the EU is officially a voluntary structure based on treaties, and the associate States hold the formal anticipation of leaving the community, the practice is different.
Brussels acts as a erstwhile office in Moscow, imposing its own solutions on the satellite states, under the threat of financial and political penalties. It besides interferes with the interior affairs of the states, attacking 1 and prepping another parties and political camps. In this way, it forces obedience and provides the governments of pro-EU groups.
From the critics' point of view, the mechanics of EU and ZSRS action is similar: it is about trying to permanently limit the anticipation of changing political direction by introducing additional legal barriers. In another words, to make it hard for future generations to make a decision different from that which the current political majority is pushing.
In fact, there is simply a fundamental conflict. On the 1 hand, there is simply a concept of strong anchoring of Poland in European structures, even at the expense of reducing the flexibility of political decisions. On the another hand, the belief that specified actions violate the principles of sovereignty and balance of authorities.
In addition, the dispute over the Constitutional Court shows that tensions are not only about abroad policy, but besides about the state's systemic model. Attempts to circumvent or reinterpret constitutional competences may lead to further erosion of institutions.
OUR COMENTARY: Regardless of the evaluation of the Black One's actions, 1 thing is certain: erstwhile communists love to have you, whether in the form of the EU or the Soviets. In their worldview there is no specified thing as Polish sovereignty. That's why they should never regulation our country.
That's not all. Poland is entering the debate phase, in which not only current decisions are decided, but besides the long-term form of the state's strategy and scope of sovereignty. Since the communists fear “PolExitu”, the social ground has clearly begun to appear to accomplish it. That's good!
We besides recommend: From Sodomy to Genderism – a past of sex ideology
